When will Egosoft get better forum servers?
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sun, 30. Nov 03, 07:51
When will Egosoft get better forum servers?
The lag is unbearable during peak hours. Takes minutes to open a single thread at times. Posts get duplicated, sometimes appearing up to an hour later. This is unacceptable.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri, 28. Oct 05, 17:06
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Fri, 19. Mar 04, 19:46
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu, 29. Jan 04, 21:11
Morrowind Forum had the same problem a while ago. It to do with the SQL backend. Until the updated they website they just limit the number of posts to 200 per thread.
The problem is where are they going to get money if everybody is returning the game
The problem is where are they going to get money if everybody is returning the game

Don't forget X3 is a sandbox don't be shy and bring you bucket and shade 

-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed, 28. Jan 04, 21:27
might need to disable persitant connections in the sql db files. Had to do that with my old World of Warcraft site that was having around 2000 users on it at a time. The site has since be closed down do to the guild splitting up, but before I hard coded to not use persitant connections it was unbearable (it was hosted from HostRocket, before that, The Planet)
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat, 27. Dec 03, 10:28
Forum troubles?
Is it just me or is the forum taking a REALLY LONG TIME to do anything? lol It just took me 1hr of trying to even get into the forums.
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue, 25. Oct 05, 16:46
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon, 10. Nov 03, 18:21
The same five posts on the first page is a little extreme...but I wonder what percentage of posts are duplicates and how many would not exist with the search function enabled. Right now there are a total 480448 posts in the General forum. Would having half that number of posts speed things up compared to the loss of performance from enabling searching? I'm guessing it wouldn't, but it would still be nice not having so many repeated postsAl wrote:Well upgrades cost money so I guess thats probably the biggest factor. Give them time and I'm sure things will get better. If nothing else the forum load will cut down once folks stop asking the same question in 5 threads on the first page
Al

-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sun, 12. Dec 04, 03:07
I don't know if Egosoft is hosting this themselves or not but whomever can put some bandwidth quality of service in place. I would think if they look at the utilization by protocol it's probably something like the downloads that are killing it. Just switch those to ftp from http and then give http higher priority, so the downloads take a little longer but since they are not interactive like the forums it will help user experiences. Just a couple $0.02 here. 

-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
I am sorry to tell you that your observation is not correct.
It is definetely not the bandwidth that is our problem.
And it's not the database either - we've got plenty of reserves there since the last upgrade.
We know what the problem is and we are dealing with it.
See here
It is definetely not the bandwidth that is our problem.
And it's not the database either - we've got plenty of reserves there since the last upgrade.
We know what the problem is and we are dealing with it.
See here
BurnIt!
In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft. / In peace lies strength.
In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft. / In peace lies strength.
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sun, 12. Dec 04, 03:07
Oh so it's the front-end web servers themselves that are being nailed or is it the php 'middle layer' that's sucking up the cycles? Just curious, I've hosted a lot of large-bandwidth sites but most of those usually bottleneck either in the db layer or in raw bandwidth (media streaming). Most of the front-end servers we put together generally have the horsepower (with plenty to spare) for the users. (generally we use sun servers but in my experience it's the number of cpu's and static page cache that really helps for just web serving). Haven't really run anything large (or medium) w/ php so any observations would be nice to see.BurnIt! wrote:I am sorry to tell you that your observation is not correct.
It is definetely not the bandwidth that is our problem.
And it's not the database either - we've got plenty of reserves there since the last upgrade.
We know what the problem is and we are dealing with it.
See here

-
- Posts: 9732
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
I a month's time, once all the hype has died down, the volume of traffic will die down. It always does. Same for any game. No point in buying new hardware or software just to deal with 2 months of heavy use every 3 years.
"I've got a bad feeling about this!" Harrison Ford, 5 times a year, trying to land his plane.
-
- Posts: 9732
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Fri, 29. Oct 04, 12:23
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
It's the "middle layer" as you describe it. The dynamic webpages that have to be parsed by PHP put an enormous strain on the CPU.
In other words: without PHP (or similar dynamic content systems) one server could handle the users and traffic we have (well at least until the demo is available). But without PHP there would be no forum either. So we're facing server number 4 now.
In other words: without PHP (or similar dynamic content systems) one server could handle the users and traffic we have (well at least until the demo is available). But without PHP there would be no forum either. So we're facing server number 4 now.
BurnIt!
In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft. / In peace lies strength.
In der Ruhe liegt die Kraft. / In peace lies strength.
-
- Posts: 9732
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
Is that the server with the hard-drives nailed to the wall, and the mobo just sitting on a table, and the PSU dangerously hanging around with wires everywhere? Was it you that used to have that picture?BurnIt! wrote: So we're facing server number 4 now.
"I've got a bad feeling about this!" Harrison Ford, 5 times a year, trying to land his plane.