Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

This forum is the ideal place for all discussion relating to X4. You will also find additional information from developers here.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

MKL81
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue, 25. Jul 23, 15:49
x4

Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by MKL81 »

With new BETA I gave it a go and decided for unmodded run, just to realize how I dislike certain mechanics. The tedious leveling of pilots aside (level up him for at least 40h to get those 3 stars only to lose him in some completely idiotic incident to a Pillager is infuriating), I just so very dislike this mechanics, that is only there to irritate the player, especially if you run extensive trading and mining operations in Paranid sectors to help them with economy. I don't mind that happening in unclaimed sectors, that are home to pirate activity like Moo-Kyes, but I will never understand why this mechanism was introduced in the first place. I know Egosoft will most probably never change that anyway, but just had to write it to find to vent my frustration, that's it. Thank you for reading ;)
Falcrack
Posts: 5714
Joined: Wed, 29. Jul 09, 00:46
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Falcrack »

Do what I did. In those sectors where BUC is destroying satellites, purchase a 1x1x1 plot in the center, and build a sensor array. They won't touch that.
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

Frankly I'm more surprised that people just ignore satellites.
Like apparently the Xenon are literally animals who just ignores all the cameras I put up in their preserve.
User avatar
chew-ie
Posts: 6677
Joined: Mon, 5. May 08, 00:05
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by chew-ie »

BUC can go home - if they hit my radar stations they can kiss their faction good bye.
Image
Spoiler
Show
BurnIt: Boron and leaks don't go well together...
Königinnenreich von Boron: Sprich mit deinem Flossenführer
Nila Ti: Folgt mir, ihr Kavalkade von neugierigen Kreaturen!
Tammancktall: Es ist eine Ehre für sie mich kennenzulernen...
CBJ: Thanks for the savegame. We will add it to our "crazy saves" collection [..]

:idea: Feature request: paint jobs on custom starts
MKL81
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue, 25. Jul 23, 15:49
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by MKL81 »

Falcrack wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 13:43 Do what I did. In those sectors where BUC is destroying satellites, purchase a 1x1x1 plot in the center, and build a sensor array. They won't touch that.
Well, I guess then it is time to do it maybe, I always wonder if sensor array modules impact performance or not, prefered not to build them if not really wanted to. Anyone noticed impact of many sensor array stations on performance in-game?
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 14:42 Frankly I'm more surprised that people just ignore satellites.
Like apparently the Xenon are literally animals who just ignores all the cameras I put up in their preserve.
What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 16:08
Falcrack wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 13:43 Do what I did. In those sectors where BUC is destroying satellites, purchase a 1x1x1 plot in the center, and build a sensor array. They won't touch that.
Well, I guess then it is time to do it maybe, I always wonder if sensor array modules impact performance or not, prefered not to build them if not really wanted to. Anyone noticed impact of many sensor array stations on performance in-game?
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 14:42 Frankly I'm more surprised that people just ignore satellites.
Like apparently the Xenon are literally animals who just ignores all the cameras I put up in their preserve.
What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
Enemies ignore them. Like I said, you can literally blanket Xenon space with it and they just ignore it. BUC is the only faction that actually acts realistically. Well, semi I guess since they aren't technically enemies.
I agree though that needing to go uncover everything manually is kinda dumb. Like do they not want customers or something? That and needing to keep a sat around to keep prices updated until you get the trade sub.
flywlyx
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat, 15. May 21, 03:45
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by flywlyx »

MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 16:08 What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
You might think Uncover works like Google Street View — even though Google has already done all the work, they won’t share the complete data package with you since you're a competitor. So, you still have to manually collect that data yourself.

What I don’t understand is the mission system. Manually collecting those missions just doesn’t make sense.
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

flywlyx wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:28
MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 16:08 What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
You might think Uncover works like Google Street View — even though Google has already done all the work, they won’t share the complete data package with you since you're a competitor. So, you still have to manually collect that data yourself.

What I don’t understand is the mission system. Manually collecting those missions just doesn’t make sense.
You can literally say the same about the mission system what you said about map data.
Also it's more like a supermarket, but no, I won't tell you where we are and I won't tell you what my prices are. In reality they should either not be trading with you in the first place, or blasting their trade offers and locations out for everyone to hear.
TheDeliveryMan
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat, 10. Dec 11, 03:10
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by TheDeliveryMan »

Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:04 That and needing to keep a sat around to keep prices updated until you get the trade sub.
No need for sats. Everytime one of your ships visits, or passes by, a station you will get up-to-date trade info of that station for the next five hours. A busy trade network keeps everything up-to-date all by itself. Just some remote will expire if they haven't been visited for five hours. Think of it as stations sending offers and price tables to good, frequent customers.
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

TheDeliveryMan wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:40
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:04 That and needing to keep a sat around to keep prices updated until you get the trade sub.
No need for sats. Everytime one of your ships visits, or passes by, a station you will get up-to-date trade info of that station for the next five hours. A busy trade network keeps everything up-to-date all by itself. Just some remote will expire if they haven't been visited for five hours. Think of it as stations sending offers and price tables to good, frequent customers.
Fair. But I'll prefer if they have a universal trading board where people can see where the best prices are. Like the old best buy best sell modules.
Like I'm fairly certain NPCs do not need to jump through as many hoops as the player to get up to date prices. Because clearly the player is the only good businessman in the whole X universe who knows the arcane art of advertisement.
LameFox
Posts: 3626
Joined: Tue, 22. Oct 13, 15:26
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by LameFox »

I've almost stopped using satellites at this point. The mechanics of placing them is shallow and tedious, I'm not going to deal with replacing them too. Especially when they're just not really necessary anymore.

For traders I set up some repeat orders scout ships until I can get trade subscriptions. For watching an area (e.g. to farm BUC Promethei) I use a station and WSA. And for most of the map I just don't bother to keep it constantly updated at all.
***modified***
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

LameFox wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 18:09 And for most of the map I just don't bother to keep it constantly updated at all.
Because frankly for most of the map there is no need to actually keep it updated. Once you have a trade network going, things just work. Eventually.
Or to put it another way. If I'm not checking that section of the map every half hour. It doesn't need monitoring.
Well, I guess pirates would need a wide surveillance network to find prey. Which incidentally makes it even weirder that that very surveillance network is tolerated.

Hmmm... Maybe now that we got diplomacy with agents, we should get some espionage style thing where we can steal trade schedules. Like since trade is currently done on the trade reservation system, and since it has a timer however inaccurate it is. Like what if we can get that in an easily parsed form? And since NPCs for the most part don't seem to use blacklists, we can then actually track where they are ourselves instead of just plastering satellites everywhere and have GOD cast invisibility on them. Invisibility to all but BUC.
adeine
Posts: 1439
Joined: Thu, 31. Aug 17, 17:34
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by adeine »

Doing the plot line and making TEM is a way to stop it from happening.
MKL81
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue, 25. Jul 23, 15:49
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by MKL81 »

flywlyx wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:28 You might think Uncover works like Google Street View — even though Google has already done all the work, they won’t share the complete data package with you since you're a competitor. So, you still have to manually collect that data yourself.
Not sure if this is right comparison. I'm not a competitor, I am and end user and their maps are a service and a grand B2B/B2C platform. They exchange the data with almost everyone interested. It's not like I need to have someone visited the Grand Canyon for me personally to map this place, that was already visited by millions, just to be able to see the map if it and plan my tour.
TheDeliveryMan wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:40 No need for sats. Everytime one of your ships visits, or passes by, a station you will get up-to-date trade info of that station for the next five hours. A busy trade network keeps everything up-to-date all by itself. Just some remote will expire if they haven't been visited for five hours. Think of it as stations sending offers and price tables to good, frequent customers.
Call me crazy but I just don't like this approach to have a ship just to know the prices of goods. It's like back to old times where you had to send a horse messenger to some person of interest in another town. That feels totally inadequate and off when being able to traverse vast distances between planets in a spaceship, that travels through portals in space. A wird mix of low and high-tech.
jlehtone
Posts: 22541
Joined: Sat, 23. Apr 05, 21:42
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by jlehtone »

Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:04
MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 16:08
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 14:42 Frankly I'm more surprised that people just ignore satellites.
Like apparently the Xenon are literally animals who just ignores all the cameras I put up in their preserve.
What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
Enemies ignore them. Like I said, you can literally blanket Xenon space with it and they just ignore it. BUC is the only faction that actually acts realistically. Well, semi I guess since they aren't technically enemies.
Wiping out enemy satellites from your space occasionally would make sense. Now we can see what happens in enemy sectors after one round of satellite placement.


By the time I did trade I did already have trade subscriptions; never needed satellites for market data. It is the knowledge about fleet movements that gives an advantage.


Besides, (Guild) missions tend to target same spot with "Deploy Satellites" missions. One more to where a dozen ZYA sats already watch ARG traffic seems redundant. I would not mind it ARG would make more space for them.
Goner Pancake Protector X
Insanity included at no extra charge.
There is no Box. I am the sand.
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

jlehtone wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 22:50
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 17:04
MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 16:08
What would be the point of deploying them in the first place if everyone would be bothered by it? I get that due to role-play reasons we might need to maybe befriend a faction first to get some sort of yet another license to deploy them (Egosoft please do not take this idea :D) but honestly I'm much more surprised that in XXX century we still need to uncover stations manually, like everything should be connected digitally by now :)
Enemies ignore them. Like I said, you can literally blanket Xenon space with it and they just ignore it. BUC is the only faction that actually acts realistically. Well, semi I guess since they aren't technically enemies.
Wiping out enemy satellites from your space occasionally would make sense. Now we can see what happens in enemy sectors after one round of satellite placement.


By the time I did trade I did already have trade subscriptions; never needed satellites for market data. It is the knowledge about fleet movements that gives an advantage.


Besides, (Guild) missions tend to target same spot with "Deploy Satellites" missions. One more to where a dozen ZYA sats already watch ARG traffic seems redundant. I would not mind it ARG would make more space for them.
Intel is important. Or more like should be important. But factions are impotent about denying them, except BUC because they have the magic ability of dispel invisibility so they can see your satellites.
Then again thinking back to some of the fics of the old X-games, or it might have been lore from the games themselves, satellites aren't just observation posts, they also do comms too.
Otherwise I was thinking they should really have factions hunt down hostile or potential hostile satellites the way they do military assets. Because essentially they are.

Otherwise ideally they should have like camo satellites you need to research and produce yourself, these would work the way they do now with an invisibility field. Then the sats you buy by the boatload and spam would be visible and treated as legit targets. For the most part nothing would change, but you no longer get free intel on hostiles, while neutrals and friendlies would just continue ignoring them. Khaak... Should ignore them too. Unless you want to be really nasty and make camo sats require nividium, then those draw Khaak, or more like Khaak can see through the camo, so if someone drags Khaak within range they can detect it.
jlehtone
Posts: 22541
Joined: Sat, 23. Apr 05, 21:42
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by jlehtone »

Stealth tech. :thumb_up: The NPC factions, if they do use (the intel from) satellites, should deploy some stealth sats too.
Goner Pancake Protector X
Insanity included at no extra charge.
There is no Box. I am the sand.
flywlyx
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat, 15. May 21, 03:45
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by flywlyx »

MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 22:31 Not sure if this is right comparison. I'm not a competitor, I am and end user and their maps are a service and a grand B2B/B2C platform. They exchange the data with almost everyone interested. It's not like I need to have someone visited the Grand Canyon for me personally to map this place, that was already visited by millions, just to be able to see the map if it and plan my tour.
The maps are available for purchase. You can buy the digital version, which includes real-time updates, for 10M, or access the free camera view by reaching 27 reputation.
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 23:26 Otherwise ideally they should have like camo satellites you need to research and produce yourself, these would work the way they do now with an invisibility field. Then the sats you buy by the boatload and spam would be visible and treated as legit targets. For the most part nothing would change, but you no longer get free intel on hostiles, while neutrals and friendlies would just continue ignoring them. Khaak... Should ignore them too. Unless you want to be really nasty and make camo sats require nividium, then those draw Khaak, or more like Khaak can see through the camo, so if someone drags Khaak within range they can detect it.
The Nividium satellite makes sense—an all-powerful god-like view should come at a high price.
Raptor34
Posts: 3515
Joined: Sat, 12. Jun 10, 04:43
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by Raptor34 »

flywlyx wrote: Wed, 6. Aug 25, 15:56
Raptor34 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 23:26 Otherwise ideally they should have like camo satellites you need to research and produce yourself, these would work the way they do now with an invisibility field. Then the sats you buy by the boatload and spam would be visible and treated as legit targets. For the most part nothing would change, but you no longer get free intel on hostiles, while neutrals and friendlies would just continue ignoring them. Khaak... Should ignore them too. Unless you want to be really nasty and make camo sats require nividium, then those draw Khaak, or more like Khaak can see through the camo, so if someone drags Khaak within range they can detect it.
The Nividium satellite makes sense—an all-powerful god-like view should come at a high price.
Nividium having more uses is nice. Also nice if we can use it to direct Khaak attacks. Like it'll be easier for me to deal with Khaak if they say focused on my nividium miners instead of hitting all my miners, even if the attack force was larger than the rest combined.
Think I've once suggested some use for some reason, but the other part was stockpiling nividium above a certain level triggers Ravager attacks. Which could be useful if this reduces other attacks because it's easier to fortify a station rather than dozens of mining spots.
vvvvvvvv
Posts: 1323
Joined: Tue, 28. Nov 23, 15:38
x4

Re: Can we PLEASE have a way to stop BUC destroy satellites?

Post by vvvvvvvv »

MKL81 wrote: Tue, 5. Aug 25, 13:07 With new BETA I gave it a go and decided for unmodded run, just to realize how I dislike certain mechanics. The tedious leveling of pilots aside (level up him for at least 40h to get those 3 stars only to lose him in some completely idiotic incident to a Pillager is infuriating), I just so very dislike this mechanics, that is only there to irritate the player, especially if you run extensive trading and mining operations in Paranid sectors to help them with economy. I don't mind that happening in unclaimed sectors, that are home to pirate activity like Moo-Kyes, but I will never understand why this mechanism was introduced in the first place. I know Egosoft will most probably never change that anyway, but just had to write it to find to vent my frustration, that's it. Thank you for reading ;)
You can proceed with Paranid plotline, one of the options will transform BUC, unlocking their rep.

A more practical solution is to use listening post - with wide range sensor. Bug nukes satellites in very small number of sectors.

The other faction that destroys satellites is SCA. In Moo-kyo/etc sectors.

Return to “X4: Foundations”