[Suggestion/QoL] Exclude/include illegal items for Retrieve All/Deposit All options in Safe Deposit Storage

[azaghal]

Hello,

Truth be told, I can easily see this getting moved out of this particular forum, but since it is closely tied-in to the newly added feature, I am hoping it would be accepted as useful feedback. Please take note that I am not able to take part in trying out the beta releases (GNU/Linux with GOG store) - so maybe you have even implemented the feature in this manner. In either case, no hard feelings if this thread gets kicked out of here, and apologies if this type of feedback does not belong to the public beta feedback forum.

In the release notes I noticed the following item:

• [Beta 7] Added Retrieve All and Deposit All options to Safe Deposit Storage menu.

This is an amazing little addition, but one thing I was wondering is whether it could be extended with some options for handling the illegal wares. Namely, it would be nice if there was an option that would include/exclude all possible illegal wares when transferring the items - possibly in the form of a checkbox, where the checkbox state is preserved across opening/closing the menu. This should help the player avoid run-ins with the NPC faction sector police.

The reason I am suggesting to include _all_ illegal wares (deemed illegal by any NPC faction) and not just the ones illegal in the current sector is for convenience, simplicity, and predictability - player will most often traverse sectors of various factions, and the HQ can often end up being located in neutral sectors (where no ware is illegal), or in sectors where only some wares are deemed illegal (like Spacefly Eggs/Caviar not being illegal in Split sectors, but otherwise illegal everywhere else).

Best regards,
Branko

[azaghal]

Heh... Probably failed to post this one in the public beta feedback forum, but maybe it does not even matter that much... Maybe someone who is keeping track of this one could let me know how this addition to safe deposit storage looks like at the moment in the beta release?

Best regards,
Branko

[CBJ]

No, you posted it there, but as you already identified, it didn't belong there because it's a feature request.

[azaghal]

No, you posted it there, but as you already identified, it didn't belong there because it's a feature request.

Edit: Brain failed to parse, nevermind

Best regards,
Branko