EnglishGermanFrenchRussianPolishItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
[MOD] Fewer PPC rounds 13/12/2006
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
modified
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 15:14    Post subject: [MOD] Fewer PPC rounds 13/12/2006 Reply with quote Print

When big battles with lots of big ships happen, could you say that all those PPC rounds contribute to a significant amount of load on the PC?

I checked the T files and those PPC rounds last almost 30 seconds in space. Based on the rate of fire and lifespan, sometimes there's at least 1000 PPC rounds in space at one time.

I'm pretty sure that contributes a heck of a lot to the in-sector performance. I modded the TBullets and TLaser files to reduce the rates of fire, but correspondingly increased the damage, energy use and energy amounts of the PPCs.

Make your own assessments for balance. Here are the originals for PPCs:
Code:
APPC
Hull damage: 2835
Shield damage: 9712
Energy used: 240
Rate of fire: 89/min
Energy: 3000

BPPC
Hull damage: 4410
Shield damage: 16187
Energy used: 280
Rate of fire: 76/min
Energy: 3500

GPPC
Hull damage: 5670
Shield damage: 32375
Energy used: 288
Rate of fire: 89/min
Energy: 4000


My changes are as follows:
Code:
APPC
Hull damage: 4192
Shield damage: 14296
Energy used: 353
Rate of fire: 60/min
Energy: 4400

BPPC
Hull damage: 5587
Shield damage: 20509
Energy used: 380
Rate of fire: 60/min
Energy: 5000

GPPC
Hull damage: 8350
Shield damage: 47656
Energy used: 424
Rate of fire: 60/min
Energy: 6000


If you're happy with the changes and would like some performance boost in big fights (eg XI missions) and do believe PPCs impact performance, but are willing to run the risk of weird OOS behaviour (mentioned below), then feel free to download this spk:

PPC Mod v2.0.2.1, SPK format

Comments and feedback are welcome!


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station


Last edited by arcana75 on Wed, 13. Dec 06, 15:03; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BlackRazor
Moderator
Moderator



Joined: 20 Apr 2004
Posts: 4619 on topic
Location: Milano, Italia
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 15:20    Post subject: Re: [MOD Question] PPC rounds and game performance Reply with quote Print

arcana75 wrote:
When big battles with lots of big ships happen, could you say that all those PPC rounds contribute to a significant amount of load on the PC?

I checked the T files and those PPC rounds last almost 30 seconds in space. Based on the rate of fire and lifespan, sometimes there's at least 1000 PPC rounds in space at one time.

I'm pretty sure that contributes a heck of a lot to the in-sector performance. I modded the TBullets and TLaser files to reduce the rates of fire, but correspondingly increased the damage, energy use and energy amounts of the PPCs.

Any comments?


AFAIK that's what the XTended mod crew did and they had to drop it in 0.7 (which is still in the works BTW) because it completely screwed OOS calculations.


_________________
"For the love of the Fish-Queen!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fud





Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 6976 on topic
Location: IN, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 15:23    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

You could speed them up, and shorten the life span of them. It can take away from their traits tho, doing that.

Sit with a calculator, and figure out damage/sec, and adjust it. If you shorten the lifespan, they'll fade out quicker. But to accomplish the same range, they'll need to have a faster velocity. This is where the balance issue is. If they're faster, they're now more of a danger to smaller ships. While this doesn't bother me personally, some might not like it.

You could reduce the damage caused by each "bullet" by the factor of how much you increased the speed.

In essense:

You increase the speed by 50%, decrease the damage by 50%. You could further balance that out by changing the rate of fire in TLasers.



In my past meddlings, I had laser towers that fired GPPCs, at over 5x the normal rate, with faster bullets, but shorter range. The result was that 4 LTs could wipe out a station with stray bullets in a matter of 4-5 seconds.

It was a little *too* much. Smile


Just fiddle with the files, you can prolly find something to help performance.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 15:24    Post subject: Re: [MOD Question] PPC rounds and game performance Reply with quote Print

BlackRazor wrote:
AFAIK that's what the XTended mod crew did and they had to drop it in 0.7 (which is still in the works BTW) because it completely screwed OOS calculations.

How so? It made the PPCs weaker? Sorry, I didn't follow the XTended mod developments...


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mad Hatter





Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 239 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 16:37    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

It completely unbalanced the OOS combat. Because of the hard coded calculations, ships that were not so tough in sector became nearly invincible OOS. I think that Xenon raiding parties were able to trash entire fleets in seconds.


_________________
Alienware Area-51m 7700
Pentium 4 670 3.8GHz, 3GB DDR2 RAM
256MB NVidia GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 17:35    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Mad Hatter wrote:
It completely unbalanced the OOS combat. Because of the hard coded calculations, ships that were not so tough in sector became nearly invincible OOS. I think that Xenon raiding parties were able to trash entire fleets in seconds.

By fixing the fire rate to 60 shots per second, I had a factor (or divisor dependng on ur view) to use on the damage, energy use and energy store. I'm not sure why but APPC and GPPC had the same RoF (89) but the BPPC had 76.

However I had to keep the bullet speeds to a theoretical maximum else they'd be too fast and deadly. I capped it to slightly slower than BHEPT, and kept their original ranges and durations. Altho it seemed to work (happened to fight a Dragon with PPCs), I'm not entirely sure what happens when durationXspeed != range... unless it's recalculated which I doubt.

There's no way to balance and at the same time maintain equal sum; something's gotta give. I chose range and duration.

Could I ask what the Xtended mod did to make OOS combat imbalanced? What values did they change?


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mad Hatter





Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 239 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 17:44    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I think that they raised the damage and lowered the rate of fire to compensate. This kept damage over time the same, but reduced the number of bullets in the air, which raised fps.

Ask over at the XTM forums and I'm sure someone can tell you what they did.


_________________
Alienware Area-51m 7700
Pentium 4 670 3.8GHz, 3GB DDR2 RAM
256MB NVidia GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frymaster



MEDAL

Joined: 06 Nov 2002
Posts: 2284 on topic
Location: Scotland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 18:05    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

i believe a smaller though still noticable performance gain can be had from editing the PPC effects to something less... glowy Razz


_________________
Math problems? Call 0800-[(10x)(13i)^2]-[sin(xy)/2.362x]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Red Spot





Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 3224 on topic
Location: The Netherlands
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 18:10    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

you can change weapons and get an even better relation between IS and OOS combat ... however dont think its just weapons ....

(I dont really see how people get the balance messed up as OOS-values you can see and basicly base weapons so they are in line IS with how they have OOS-values ... I did it in X2 and in time I'll do it again with X3....)



G


_________________
Last edited by Red Spot on Sat, 2. Jul 05, 20:05; edited 34 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
minikin





Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 29 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Dec 06, 18:11    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Reducing PPC rate of fire dramatically increases FPS.

In my game I reduced PPCs to firing 30 shots per minute while still maintaining the same amount of damage a torrent of PPC bolts would inflict in that same 60 seconds. With a few tweaks to other things here and there, lag in big battles is virtually non-existent now.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Syklon





Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 1268 on topic
Location: Texas
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Dec 06, 00:40    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Mad Hatter wrote:
I think that they raised the damage and lowered the rate of fire to compensate. This kept damage over time the same, but reduced the number of bullets in the air, which raised fps.

Ask over at the XTM forums and I'm sure someone can tell you what they did.

ya thats what we did, unfortunatly it caused the occasional OOS hiccup where a couple pirate fighters would take out an m2 or something equally as bad

we're still testing to see what we can do for .7 to improve performance

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Dec 06, 04:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Hmmm it's possible that rate of fire and bullet speed are taken into account when fighting OOS, maybe to account for target agility or ship size.

To compensate for less rate of fire, I increased bullet speed as well as the requisite damage/energy.


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Dec 06, 14:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Anyway I'm gonna put up the mod for download; caveat emptor I suppose. I've been using it and IS combat seems great.


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
al_main





Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Posts: 1379 on topic
Location: Playing X3
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Dec 06, 15:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

The theory was:

Wth the half fire rate / double damage (ie same damage over time) it seemed that OOS the calculations could get iffy. Presumably because getting the first shot in was now far more advantageous. The result was that Xenon Q's (M7 class) against a destroyer would usually get the first shot in due to their superior speed and hence the extra damage. So basically they would usually win against a superior opponent.

Basically a fast ship Dragon/Q/etc would appear to get first shot against a slower but superior ship and with more damage on the PPC round would end up winning OOS. OOS the ROF didnt seem to effect it.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
arcana75





Joined: 02 Dec 2003
Posts: 2154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Dec 06, 15:05    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

al_main wrote:
The theory was:

Wth the half fire rate / double damage (ie same damage over time) it seemed that OOS the calculations could get iffy. Presumably because getting the first shot in was now far more advantageous. The result was that Xenon Q's (M7 class) against a destroyer would usually get the first shot in due to their superior speed and hence the extra damage. So basically they would usually win against a superior opponent.

Basically a fast ship Dragon/Q/etc would appear to get first shot against a slower but superior ship and with more damage on the PPC round would end up winning OOS. OOS the ROF didnt seem to effect it.

Which is interesting in itself, since in an IS battle, a faster ship would get the upper hand against a slower ship, especially if we're talking about an M7 vs an M2.


_________________
Nanite Hull Repair, Resource-Free Factory, Collect Wares Mk 2, Remove Products from Docks, Hack Station
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Sat, 31. Jul 10, 09:55

All times are GMT + 2 Hours


Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2009
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Message Board Statistics Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.38271 seconds, sql queries = 72