X-Rebirth No piloting Capital ships!!??

General discussions about the games by Egosoft including X-BTF, XT, X², X³: Reunion, X³: Terran Conflict and X³: Albion Prelude.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

User avatar
perkint
Posts: 5191
Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
x3tc

Post by perkint »

Xydonus wrote:Yeah just read that now, which is good although slightly confusing as to exactly what it means in-game.
Very disappointed about no official translation of the full interview :(

Tim
Struggling to find something from the forums - Google it!!! :D
Xydonus
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun, 13. Sep 09, 07:40
x3ap

Post by Xydonus »

'What can one do there? - Loads. How trade is done is even different. There's no landing to pick up wares and take them elsewhere. You now overfly the station and see what's on offer. Scanning stations and ships (legal or otherwise) will be important in the game. It was the case before that it didn't matter where you fired. Now the player can identify critical systems and target them.'

Note the part where he says 'There's no landing to pick up wares and take them elsewhere.'

If he did mean something else, he needs to be more literal to what he says.
A5PECT
Posts: 6189
Joined: Sun, 3. Sep 06, 02:31
x4

Post by A5PECT »

Translation.

NDA.

That's two whole levels of potential misinterpretation. Right now we have very vague, very abstract ideas about how Rebirth will play.

On capital ships, I'm only willing to qualify Bernd's statements as far as "player control of capital ships has been altered." It may have been changed slightly, or dramatically, or removed completely. We don't know. That leaves a whole lot up to the imagination; I don't see why people immediately take that as "no more capital ships" and give up on the whole game.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step in figuring out how to make it worse.
User avatar
perkint
Posts: 5191
Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
x3tc

Post by perkint »

Xydonus wrote:'Note the part where he says 'There's no landing to pick up wares and take them elsewhere.'

If he did mean something else, he needs to be more literal to what he says.
That's my point - he doesn't say:
"There's no landing"
He says:
"There's no landing to pick up wares".

An official translation would be very nice to help clarify such points :(

Or even an official hint as to when more info will be released - beyond just "June" which potentially represents a period of time covering 14% of the time left before release!

OK, I've based that on release at the start of Q4 which isn't likely, but my point still stands - give us a clue!!!

Tim
Struggling to find something from the forums - Google it!!! :D
Bernd
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
x4

Post by Bernd »

Hi guys,

ok lets be a bit more precise about the capital ships then. Piloting a huge capital ship from the seat of the pilot is boring, therefore we left that out.

ON THE OTHER HAND: The player can own and can command ships and he can use them for a lot more different things than before.

Stations as well as large ships have a lot more ways to interact with them now and your own as well as other factions ships are much more interesting to play with.

Instead of sitting in the cockpit you will assign people to command ships for you.

Hope this clears things up...

-Bernd
Bernd
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
x4

Post by Bernd »

Hi guys,

ok lets be a bit more precise about the capital ships then. Piloting a huge capital ship from the seat of the pilot is boring, therefore we left that out.

ON THE OTHER HAND: The player can own and can command ships and he can use them for a lot more different things than before.

Stations as well as large ships have a lot more ways to interact with them now and your own as well as other factions ships are much more interesting to play with.

Instead of sitting in the cockpit you will assign people to command ships for you.

Hope this clears things up...

-Bernd
A5PECT
Posts: 6189
Joined: Sun, 3. Sep 06, 02:31
x4

Post by A5PECT »

God, I love Egosoft.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step in figuring out how to make it worse.
User avatar
EmperorJon
Posts: 9378
Joined: Mon, 29. Dec 08, 20:58
x3tc

Post by EmperorJon »

It's as I thought. :)

Wait... did Bernd just douple post. :O
______
I'm Jon. I'm mostly not around any more. If you want to talk, please message me! It's cool.
______
razorhead
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed, 25. Jun 03, 20:52
x4

Post by razorhead »

EmperorJon wrote: Wait... did Bernd just douple post. :O
Just to make things even clearer :P
Catra
Posts: 7754
Joined: Mon, 12. Oct 09, 21:54

Post by Catra »

Is it too late for a petition to convince em to change that? Cause really cap ship flying was horrible because of the atrocious RPM. Its a massive step in the wrong direction to remove the players ability to fly one instead of simply upping the turn rate to something less frustrating.
Just saying it forward: I give everyone 2 posts to make good, in context posts(proper english, as always, is optional). After that I'm ignoring what you have to say in that thread that's directed to what we previously were talking about.
User avatar
Sorkvild
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu, 8. Jun 06, 14:07
x3tc

Post by Sorkvild »

I like this idea, therefore I would like to see improved version of tactical map and command including personnel assignment for the capital ship.

I mean something better than in the previous games, offering broader selection of options and views of our big ship.
Something to make us actually be in total control instead of pressing the button for two minutes and waiting for the capital to turn over ;)

Anyways, probably after the release our talented moders will do something about piloting the cap ships ;)
Elite Dangerous| I survived the Dragon Incident ... then I took an arrow to the knee
We want the Boron back!
A5PECT
Posts: 6189
Joined: Sun, 3. Sep 06, 02:31
x4

Post by A5PECT »

Catra wrote:Is it too late for a petition to convince em to change that? Cause really cap ship flying was horrible because of the atrocious RPM. Its a massive step in the wrong direction to remove the players ability to fly one instead of simply upping the turn rate to something less frustrating.
It wasn't just the turn rate that made capital ships not fun to fly.

You used the same exact controls as with a fighter, and they handled the same exact way. You press x to go faster. You use the mouse/joystick to steer. You press l to fire missiles.

Capital ships didn't feel like capital ships.

The captain of the USS Nimitz doesn't sit on the bridge with one hand on the steering wheel, the other on the throttle, and his foot on the missile launch button. Mainly because the Nimitz doesn't have a steering wheel, throttle bar, or just one button to launch missiles. They're all part of a complex series of mechanical and electronic subsystems that all add up to a gargantuan war machine. Naturally something that complicated isn't going to be operated by a single man, even with computer assistance.

The problem with X3 (and previous X-games) is that the engine was created for a game where you only flew a single ship: a fighter. When ES decided to give the player the ability to fly capital ships, all they did was transplant the flight mechanics of that original fighter into a larger ship, essentially making it another fighter. Just bigger.

Now that sounds cool in concept, and I'm sure a lot of X fans were excited when they first got their hands on it capital ships, but ten years down the line the novelty has worn off and the flaws in the implementation are apparent.

On a more personal note, why do you immediately assume changing the capital ship mechanics will make the game less fun? You have to acknowledge the possibility that the design choices Egosoft have made could actually make the game more fun.

It can go either way, but you're never going to know until it's better or worse until the game is actually out.
Last edited by A5PECT on Sat, 28. May 11, 17:48, edited 2 times in total.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step in figuring out how to make it worse.
jlehtone
Posts: 22477
Joined: Sat, 23. Apr 05, 21:42
x4

Post by jlehtone »

Sorkvild wrote: I mean something better than in the previous games, ...
I'd prefer something different than in the previous games. Same old same old got old yazuras ago. It seems that there might be something (semi)novel. But until I see it, do I care?
User avatar
Sorkvild
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu, 8. Jun 06, 14:07
x3tc

Post by Sorkvild »

Just forgot to add. What about the M7 frigate ships ? I hope these ships will be able to control manually
Elite Dangerous| I survived the Dragon Incident ... then I took an arrow to the knee
We want the Boron back!
pja
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri, 6. May 05, 19:15
x4

Post by pja »

Well I enjoyed flying cap ships and will miss it.
Gold Dragon
Posts: 1155
Joined: Wed, 30. Jul 08, 05:31
x3tc

Post by Gold Dragon »

"I enjoyed flying cap ships and will miss it."

I thought I did, too... until every time I started crashing into an NPC ship and destroying it in a TL. Got old and boring in a hurry, especially since it actually dropped rankings with 2 seperate races by 4-5 levels each.

Now, I only fly up to M6. Anything else can be commanded via auto-pilot, and prefferably OOS.


Still, what Bernd said (in double-posting) sounds interesting.


EDIT: Typos
Last edited by Gold Dragon on Sat, 28. May 11, 18:11, edited 2 times in total.
-- GD
jlehtone
Posts: 22477
Joined: Sat, 23. Apr 05, 21:42
x4

Post by jlehtone »

Sorkvild wrote:Just forgot to add. What about the M7 frigate ships ? I hope these ships will be able to control manually
"M7" refers to shipclass system of present games, and "frigate" refers to naval ships. Naval ship associations always turn up heated and fruitless debates about the meaning of the names, and the class system hopefully is totally revamped in X-R. Thus, a more proper thing to guess is, how powerful will the most powerful pilotable ship be?
User avatar
Stars_InTheirEyes
Posts: 5095
Joined: Tue, 9. Jan 07, 22:04
x4

Post by Stars_InTheirEyes »

It might be too late but...

Heres two ideas..

#1 - Instead of viewing Cap ships from the bridge or whatever you might consider it as now in TC... You view it as 3rd person (as if there was a constant battle sattelite orbiting your ship sending back video telemetry a good 3/4km from the center point of the hull), with an interactive screen like "click on a ship to fire on just that ship" and "hold J and click in an direction to fire on all enemy ships in that direction", which makes the camera move into position to view said actions from an appropriate angle. You can also control "major systems" and view other diagnostics of the ship's status from various other controls.

Hope my idea was clear.. I quite liked it..

#2 - (Idea from other games) You dont constantly view the outside world, you view it from inside.. like from Mass Effect 2. (Going to stop here as i prefer idea #1 to this)
This sı not ǝpısdn down.
jiman
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon, 14. Jun 10, 10:23
x3tc

Post by jiman »

Bernd wrote:Hi guys,

ok lets be a bit more precise about the capital ships then. Piloting a huge capital ship from the seat of the pilot is boring, therefore we left that out.

ON THE OTHER HAND: The player can own and can command ships and he can use them for a lot more different things than before.

Stations as well as large ships have a lot more ways to interact with them now and your own as well as other factions ships are much more interesting to play with.

Instead of sitting in the cockpit you will assign people to command ships for you.

Hope this clears things up...

-Bernd
This sounds like the game will have better macro managment. THIS SOUNDS LIKE THE GAME WILL HAVE BETTER MACRO MANAGMENT!

*ahem*

I am very exicted to hear this... if what I am hearing is correct.

I would love to hear more indepth details of this... if its true. Better macro managment was going to be a deal breaker for me.
forloren
Winner X3TC Forum Quest
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun, 24. Sep 06, 04:05
x4

Post by forloren »

In Bernd I trust. :)

About 2 years ago Bernd did an interview, and in it was the following:
If you had to create “the ultimate game” what would it be?

Probably just the "ultimate" version of what we do already - the PERFECT space simulation game. You can go everywhere, be everybody, do everything and always have a lot of fun. Sounds simple enough to do, right? Well, we are on the job…stay tuned ;-)
On which project are you working now and what can you tell us about it?

See above. The ultimate space simulation game ;-)
I can't quite understand why there is so much negativity surrounding what X Rebirth might entail. Would the ultimate space sim lack capital class ships? No. But then again, the ultimate space sim wouldn't just have capital ships be nothing more than a larger single seated fighter. Also, the ultimate space sim wouldn't prevent you from going on board your own capital ships. Same thing with station docking, the ultimate space sim would have some means for people to get on and off stations, especially ones that you own, either in whole or part.

I do think Egosoft is playing with us a bit though, and I personally don't mind. They don't want to spoil the surprise by just coming out and confirming or denying our fears, because for the most part those fears probably aren't applicable to the mechanics of X Rebirth and they don't want to release the details of the mechanics yet.

I don't think X Rebirth is their final vision, it's a step towards it. The last thing they want to do is lay an egg, as that would most likely mean the end of Egosoft and their quest to create "the PERFECT space simulation game".

-Forloren

Return to “X Trilogy Universe”