The Epstein list

[Usenko]

As has been noted a few times on other threads, the fact that the president of the USA is mentioned frequently on the Epstein files does not necessarily make him guilty of paedophilia, at least not in the legal sense (in that a higher standard of evidence is necessary to even put someone on trial, let alone have them convicted).

However, I think one thing that many people DON'T seem to notice is that the sheer scale of the president's appearances in the files DOES automatically make him extremely corrupt. At the very least he tried to hide these documents from the public. And when the documents became available, it was instantly obvious that whether or not he was actually participating in child sex offences, the president was actively involved in a group of people who WERE actively participating in these and other offences.

[berth]

Is there a subject you won't post on?
Philips' botfarm.

[Usenko]

I don't know much about Scottish Tartan making techniques.

In my defence, it says something that in a week where we had a protest in Sydney against a visit from the Israeli President where police beat the living tar out of protesters (including at least one of my friends, who I know to be a hardcore pacifist), the Epstein list is STILL the biggest news in Australia.

[Gavrushka]

I don't know much about Scottish Tartan making techniques.

In my defence, it says something that in a week where we had a protest in Sydney against a visit from the Israeli President where police beat the living tar out of protesters (including at least one of my friends, who I know to be a hardcore pacifist), the Epstein list is STILL the biggest news in Australia.

It's headlines most days here in the UK, but for more direct reasons (or rather because of certain individuals.)

I feel there are a lot of very powerful people in the US who are trying to control the narrative, hoping that 'Epstein' just goes away. All the crazy things that have been happening - Venezuela, Greenland, Iran and others - I can't help but think it is an attempt to change that narrative, but it's never going to work.

There are victims, and they are not going to be silenced. There is a mass of evidence which isn't going to disappear, and all it takes is the right non-partisan people to examine the non-redacted version for the perpetrators to face justice, but that isn't going to be until post-Trump I imagine.

I've a feeling there are going to be a number of Trump's inner circle face jailtime for attempting to pervert the course of justice, in addition to those who will be put on trial for their heinous actions against minors.

[philip_hughes]

I'm not on it. I promise. If i am i have a good explanation.... i was lost in the Caribbean

[Alan Phipps]

I'm going to close this thread as the OP clearly makes it more about Trump than the wider crimes and files issues, and everything the OP covers has already been done to death in the Trump thread.