Chris0132 wrote:I don't get why people think charging for DLC is an abhorrent practice.
You pay like $50 for an X game, and then go on to play it for a hundred hours or so. That's pretty damn good value for money. Certainly better than most other forms of entertainment, probably better than books, definitely better than movies, infinitely better than food.
So with that in mind, ego should really charge more for X, but of course then nobody would buy it, because gamers are the whinyest bunch of cheapskates on the face of the earth.
If the DLC they release averages at a dollar an hour in terms of entertainment value, it's a good deal, and you can't complain about paying for it.
Some companies have 'poisoned' players minds against DLC by offering bad value for money on it. EA/Bioware have done some bad DLC deals in Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age.
The entire concept of DLC offends some people who would prefer a decent expansion to a game rather than bits and pieces doled out over many months.
Of course, some companies do offer good DLC deals. A lot of the ones which stick in my mind are small and Indy dev studios who really want to offer something back as thanks to their supporters, but still need to charge for it.
Then there are some companies who truly shine in this area like CD Projekt. They never charge for DLC and have released enhanced editions of both Witcher and Witcher 2 with enough DLC to be counted as small expansions. All at no cost to the customer. Kind of makes other larger studios look like tools in comparison.
If you want a different perspective, stand on your head.