Lets be realistic
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Sat, 26. Feb 05, 01:47
Re: Lets be realistic
or the most realistic way, the split ships will only go to dlc owners
Fixed ships getting spawned away from ship configuration menu at resupply ships from automatically getting deployables.
-
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Thu, 9. Jan 03, 19:47
Re: Lets be realistic
Im not worked up as i have the collectors edition, just thinking of the people who dont and might be expecting more sectors is all.repatomonor wrote: ↑Wed, 16. Oct 19, 21:48It's no secret and there's no point in working yourself up over this - it's confirmed that the bigger universe will be introduced by the DLC, not by the 3.0 version.Skeeter wrote: ↑Wed, 16. Oct 19, 19:09 Im just wondering is the new map sectors because of the 3.0 or the dlc. If dlc then those without the dlc might get a little mad if they have been wanting a bigger map but didnt want the dlc. Pretty sure most new sectors will be split so makes sense that it will require the dlc. So it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri, 26. Aug 05, 22:39
Re: Lets be realistic
Eh... as there have been reports of modded ships getting into games and various bugs allowing multiple ships and such, I wouldn't be surprised if those got through as well.
I mean if they can take it, keep it, it's not like they can cap many of them. I'm more worried that
I somehow doubt that's the case, wouldn't that mean that a simple mod would unlock all DLC content? I don't remember how XR went as I had all DLCs on release, collectors for X4 as well. I'd just rather not have to think about others accessing content for free that I paid for myself.repatomonor wrote: ↑Wed, 16. Oct 19, 21:48
Absolutely nothing for a very simple reason: vanilla game gets the DLC content too - you just won't be able to access the DLC content yourself.
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sat, 25. Oct 08, 00:48
Re: Lets be realistic
OK. This thread is not obsolete. We know Split & 3.0 will come Q1 2020 
(yes changed my vote also
)

(yes changed my vote also

-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Fri, 26. Aug 05, 22:39
Re: Lets be realistic
Whelp I'm not changing it, embrace the shame and learn from it is my motto.

Still going to be bugged, when did Ego release something not broken in some way or form?

-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Wed, 10. Aug 16, 13:28
Re: Lets be realistic
I voted “not a chance” and it looks like I WAS RIGHT! Wohoo



-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 13126
- Joined: Sat, 9. Nov 02, 11:45
Re: Lets be realistic
How about that X2 performance patch which deleted everything in the universe? Did what it said on the tin.
Come watch me on Twitch where I occasionally play several of the X games
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sat, 25. Oct 08, 00:48
Re: Lets be realistic
Wow you remember it after 20yXenon_Slayer wrote: ↑Thu, 17. Oct 19, 14:50How about that X2 performance patch which deleted everything in the universe? Did what it said on the tin.

-
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Mon, 22. Oct 18, 13:54
Re: Lets be realistic
looks like a few people are changing their votes on the pole 

SPA - Split Paranid Alliance
Death to Teladi and Boron
Enslave the rest
Death to Teladi and Boron
Enslave the rest
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Wed, 10. Aug 16, 13:28
Re: Lets be realistic
It was 11 votes in the morning for “not a chance”. Now 20. It’ll be the leading answer soonKpla Keltak wrote: ↑Thu, 17. Oct 19, 21:36 looks like a few people are changing their votes on the pole![]()

-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 31812
- Joined: Fri, 16. Apr 04, 19:21
Re: Lets be realistic
"It was 11 votes in the morning for “not a chance”. Now 20." That would be the Ego devs voting today, I expect. 

A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sat, 25. Oct 08, 00:48
Re: Lets be realistic
Alan Phipps wrote: ↑Thu, 17. Oct 19, 23:24 "It was 11 votes in the morning for “not a chance”. Now 20." That would be the Ego devs voting today, I expect.![]()
