[Resource & progress]my ship showcase room(07/02/12)

vkerinav · Post by **vkerinav** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 02:47

morikaane wrote:Personally, no offence to the goner, but I'd have a serious change of heart when someone starts attacking me.

Nothing against the Goner being peaceful, but they should be able to defend themselves if attacked. You can't be a pacifist in a pool filled with sharks especially if you can't run.............

M.

Any pacifist who has a change of heart when attacked was never one to begin with.

Also; yes you can. However, it takes more courage than it does to fight back.

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 04:04

update on that USC M2P (god, i love this ship..)

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... pssk3k.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... ukubkz.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... doicd8.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... labba3.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... a208mm.jpg

Glimpse · Post by **Glimpse** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 04:11

Looks awesome. I'd love to fly that being a Terran only pilot.

Though I couldn't see any turrets. Do you have a layout in mind?

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 04:14

Glimpse wrote:Looks awesome. I'd love to fly that being a Terran only pilot. Though I couldn't see any turrets. Do you have a layout in mind?

oh, i do have a layout of
24 front
32 left right
8 missile tubes
16 up down
in mind (balance ship stats is not my thing..)

mr.WHO · Post by **mr.WHO** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 09:52

Now it look like USC Tyr (not that it's bad

)

Vanysh2 · Post by **Vanysh2** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 13:29

The USC M2P is perfect right now.

mr.WHO · Post by **mr.WHO** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 13:54

I think that XRM wise, this ship should replace AP Kyoto (coz vanilla one don't look much of Terran design) as Paul stated that Terrans/ATF have enough ships and he has problem with Betty names already.

vkerinav · Post by **vkerinav** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 15:46

Actually, the Kyoto looks quite Terran. The problem is that it matches the new line established by the Hayabusa, Toukan, and Maccana, which is a new official style, not Cadius'.

Glimpse · Post by **Glimpse** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 16:43

Ah excellent. Instapwn ships are always welcome!

So when is the release?

garrry34 · Post by **garrry34** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 16:52

I'm liking it but may I make a suggestion, would you consider moving the nagoya bridge to the front onto the godzilla head?

bmtv0957 · Post by **bmtv0957** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 16:58

Wow, those ships look amazing. Good job on them!

I'm a total noob at modding in this game. Is there any way for me to fly these ships in X3AP?

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 17:08

garrry34 wrote:I'm liking it but may I make a suggestion, would you consider moving the nagoya bridge to the front onto the godzilla head?

no i wont, because i like to have all the command structure and stuff concentrate at one place, just like the whole ship's style, it's "packed"

and i am lowering the tyr bridge abit, it's abit too tall

Sn4kemaster · Post by **Sn4kemaster** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 17:17

expnobody wrote:update on that USC M2P (god, i love this ship..)

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... pssk3k.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... ukubkz.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... doicd8.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... labba3.jpg
http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... a208mm.jpg

Looks very good, very good, matches the Terran M1+ that's Cadius designed very well, so would make a very good replacement for the Nagoya which is just a copy of a ship from another game (which Cadius was slowly replacing anyway).....then with this as the new M2+ the AP Kyoto can be the new Valhalla style M0

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 19:01

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... 9irn9r.jpg

arming it to the teeth!

bmtv0957 · Post by **bmtv0957** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 20:35

expnobody wrote:http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... 9irn9r.jpg

arming it to the teeth!

Oh my god I want that shiiiiipppp!!!!111

mr.WHO · Post by **mr.WHO** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 21:06

Hey expnobody - your modeling is so good that I think you really should try to make your own version of USC M0 (aka USC Valhalla) - I think that AP Kyoto is too low quality to stand next to your and Cadius ship.

Sn4kemaster · Post by **Sn4kemaster** » Sun, 18. Dec 11, 23:31

expnobody wrote:
garrry34 wrote:I'm liking it but may I make a suggestion, would you consider moving the nagoya bridge to the front onto the godzilla head?
no i wont, because i like to have all the command structure and stuff concentrate at one place, just like the whole ship's style, it's "packed"

and i am lowering the tyr bridge abit, it's abit too tall

expnobody i think the height is very good on this current model....

Really helps to break the shape up, if you lower it...well it might look to tubular as a model.

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... ukubkz.jpg

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... labba3.jpg

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... pssk3k.jpg

I really like this ship and think you should leave it as it is

edit ... in your newer version you have lowered the bridge and it does not look as good IMO...its to flat now.

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... 9irn9r.jpg

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Mon, 19. Dec 11, 00:24

the tall bridge version doesnt make me feel good when i am doing the center of gravity (pivot point) for the ship. it feels too, hmm, weird compare to the over all shape of the ship.

(not that i dont like tall bridge, it's really cool and awesome, but IMO it doesnt work on this model)

Sn4kemaster · Post by **Sn4kemaster** » Mon, 19. Dec 11, 00:44

Well all I can ask is to have a think about it....the earlier version made me go "wow that's great'" when I 1st saw it!

I really think the extra height makes the ship (gives it a u-boat look)

Anyway either way it's a nice design, if u decide to keep the lower bridge then you may have to do something with the sides to give them more shape, as it's very tubular. (maybe increase the width of the engines and give it a slightly narrow waist some where)

On the subject of new ships any Argon M3B and Argon M3 on the horizon...always thought the Argon would benefit from a Nova based on the OTAS Venti.....Ie super sexy space superiority fighter that almost comes close in performance to the Terran ATF Stuff!

expnobody · Post by **expnobody** » Mon, 19. Dec 11, 01:21

even if it's lower, i still think it does not look tubular from the side

http://bbs.deeptimes.org/data/attachmen ... r6cyfy.jpg

you say it looks tubular it's probably because of the angle.

PS: hanger and catapult and TS/M6/M8 docking slots added to the bottom of the ship. i think it's about time to get this baby ingame and start playing AP (i make this ship just because i want to have my personal ship in AP, and my previous ship doesnt seem to statisfy me..)

egosoft.com

egosoft.com

[Resource & progress]my ship showcase room(07/02/12)