

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
Yes, 'persuaded' them by offering them a superior cut of their sales profits in addition to offering a bunch of other services that are valuable to a developer as part of the package. Real gun to the head kind of stuff there!David Howland wrote:DRM is operating in a very similar way; first Steam has persuaded ES to not use the oposition, steam-free disks. Once ES is well truly dependant on their rental system, they can dictate to ES, their financial cut!
But there is nothing wrong with that NUCLEAR-SLUG? Thats just business!
That's just an unfortunate side effect of our own consumer habits. Over the years we gamers have ably demonstrated to the gaming industry time and again that we're willing to pay x amount for a game, so that's become the defacto standard. Steam doesn't set prices, the publishers do. The fact that it might cost less to distribute digitally is no longer relevant. The industry charges what it does because the industry knows we're dumb enough to pay it.quase wrote:The price for a digital distribution though, should be far less of course and that is where Steam (and other digital distributors) horribly fail. In fact games are on average 10€ more expansive as digital-only version through Steam than they are on the shelves. Maybe not in the rest of the world, but at least here in Germany, go figure ...
Looks interesting.. Cheers for the tip!quase wrote: Other independent developers offer DRM free and Steam-free versions of their games (e.g. Vessels by Strange Loop Games, a brilliant game by the way) over their own website, as well as a Steam version.
We'll make it to the 300!!!dougeye wrote:i notice this thread is just the same people on both sides sluggin it out still. although the rate at which to page count is increasign has slowed downjust pointing it out
That does not explain why the retail version is still much cheaper than the digital one though. If they would have just taken the prices which we "were used to pay" why did they charge more?NUKLEAR-SLUG wrote:That's just an unfortunate side effect of our own consumer habits. Over the years we gamers have ably demonstrated to the gaming industry time and again that we're willing to pay x amount for a game, so that's become the defacto standard. Steam doesn't set prices, the publishers do. The fact that it might cost less to distribute digitally is no longer relevant. The industry charges what it does because the industry knows we're dumb enough to pay it.quase wrote:The price for a digital distribution though, should be far less of course and that is where Steam (and other digital distributors) horribly fail. In fact games are on average 10€ more expansive as digital-only version through Steam than they are on the shelves. Maybe not in the rest of the world, but at least here in Germany, go figure ...
No problemo, but get the game directly from the developer. They give you a Steam key on top for free either. We do not want to have Steam take away their cut from the hardworking devs, do we?NUKLEAR-SLUG wrote:Looks interesting.. Cheers for the tip!quase wrote:Other independent developers offer DRM free and Steam-free versions of their games (e.g. Vessels by Strange Loop Games, a brilliant game by the way) over their own website, as well as a Steam version.
Sure not bad, but actually not enough. I can never install the game without Steam and that is one important point. If it is not about copy protection, put the Steam free executable on the DVD and I am fine with it.Ravna wrote: Doesn't it speak for EG to offer a non-Steam executable once you have registered your game ?
There will be a disk. It will still require Steam activation though. At least that's the last word we have from Egosoft.DJC wrote:PLEASE tell me that this new game will not require Steam! I like hard copies. Yes I have a steam account so I can't say I won't buy it if it requires steam. I really, and I use this word for its true meaning, HATE steam since the begining of steam(Half-Life2) it has been nothing but problems for me. I never even finished the game for the disaster that steam was. I deleated everything and forgot about it. It was not until 9 months ago when I realised that Steam and platforms like it were the only way I was going to play games on a pc any more. So I reopened an account. I still HATE Steam although they are better then in the begining. Steam would be a great disapointment for me, and I urge the developers to stay away from it. However I am a big fan of the X series and will most likley buy it. I will also say that I want a disk, not a download and that could sway me to not buy the game.
How could anyone forget all those poked out tongues and twisted smilies?the old one wrote:Hi ,slashman glad you have not forgotten me and my wild posts so i will add another one for you. If steam according to many posters is great and good why are there pages and pages of work arounds and people loseing there saved games,or maybe as been stated it is the fault of the gamers pc and not steam. Personaly i have a good pc and fast broadband but i just do not like it and do not want the pox
![]()
on my machine,the old one
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I could never forget you. But you need to keep up or David will take the crown and rule the crazy conspiracy kingdom. Don't let that usurper take your rightful place!!!the old one wrote:Hi ,slashman glad you have not forgotten me and my wild posts so i will add another one for you. If steam according to many posters is great and good why are there pages and pages of work arounds and people loseing there saved games,or maybe as been stated it is the fault of the gamers pc and not steam. Personaly i have a good pc and fast broadband but i just do not like it and do not want the pox
![]()
on my machine,the old one
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I liked the part where you provided a citation for your claim. The anecdotal evidence of you and 2 or 3 other people in this thread don't really fly with me, as I wouldn't call that "many" when there are 4.1 million users on Steam right now. 0.0000009% of 4.1 million people doesn't fit my definition of "many".David Howland wrote:many have not even got through their first 24 hours without ISSUES and indeed have given Steam up within a week!
Hi David,David Howland wrote:Hi rusky,
I am so pleased that you have had such a lucky good five years of Steam service with ALMOST no issues. Count yourself very fortunate, many have not even got through their first 24 hours without ISSUES and indeed have given Steam up within a week! I'd be grateful if you could drop me some tips as I am considering putting Steam temporarily on an old redundant laptop to install AP.
Hi Slashman and the old one,
No I could never usurp, the old one. He is the true bastion of resistance, to him I give my fealty and gratitude for all that his posts have taught me. I try and keep my posts as concise and sharp as his but usually fail. Also as you read above, I am toying with playing with the pox on an old laptop, the old one would never do that, he keeps his operating systems pristine. Also he has been posting against steam longer than I, without getting banished, which my clumsiness led me into. So long may he lead where I will be content to follow!
I know exactly what you mean. I would never ever consider buying a game if it was not on Steam!David Howland wrote:Oh dear angrytigerp,
Yes but many are like X addicts, now unable to get their fix any other way!
Many drug addicts are prepared to face a future worse than death, do you wonder that game addicts will suffer the purgatory of DRM?
Boasting of the captive millions there, you remind me of Hitler boasting of the millions 'put to sleep', for the greater good?
Second time he's done it now. :/EmperorJon wrote:You have just compared using Steam to an act of genocide. Well done. Now everyone's going to take you seriously.