If you ignore the fact that we're losing Tech Support and risking conflicts with future patches...Shootist wrote:Seems to be the Perfect Solution to me.Ripskar wrote:The main plot had to do with the Argon War Effort.
The new plots have completion of that as a requirement.
The Terran Revitalization Project is working on adding the new plots but will result in ***MODIFIED***.
I can't believe we're being driven to this...
X3AP version 2.0 – The war continues
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: Mon, 22. Feb 10, 19:18
Do you miss dangerous pirates?
Try leading the target a little more...
Cobra Mk. III Cmdr.
Try leading the target a little more...

-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue, 26. Sep 06, 01:15
-
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Sun, 6. Jul 08, 10:29
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Fri, 19. Nov 10, 06:23
It is rather embarassing to attack someone and ask them to "midly" educate themselves, when your posts lack the grammar, punctuation and acknowledgement of previous points made. Prior to 5 days ago, there was no mention of added equipment being unavailable to the Terran Players. We are not talking about actual story line. I will quote the War section from the Survival Guide:Catra wrote: if you stopped trolling and midly educated yourself, you would find it easily countered in the WAR! section. he left out the remaining portion of that segment that details what options you have as a terran commander.
"The main game plot story is available from the Argon Peacekeeper gamestart but not the Terran Commander one."
(1) First, you will notice the mention of the plot is listed to ONE start only. Because prior to this, they state that only the two new AP starts have War access.
(2) Who in their right mind decided to link the massive content-boost known as PHQ/UFJD/HUB to the damn main plot? It would have been trivial to have them unconnected like some generic plot available from some no-faction indestructible ship - like has been done before.
So, while your reputation ensures you will continue your behaviour, I'll explain our points once again.
(a) We don't mind no plot. We knew there was no plot. No plot never stopped us from buying factories, or doing certain kinds of generic missions, or boarding or etc.
(b) Prior to 5 days ago, there wasn't a single mention of PHQ/HuB/UFJD being even tied to "the" plot. People were totally in the dark discussing whether it would cost something like 500 million creds, or would you need 40000 microships again. That is a very clear indicator that everyone was expecting it.
(c) There is no indication, anywhere, that you would not get access to these items because you played Terran Commander. Not in game, and not out of game. Ever according to the War section, no one other than Argon Peace Keeper should have access to HUB/PHQ/UFJD. Of course, that would be a slap in the face of most players.. so somehow, a slap in the face of significant percentage was done instead.
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon, 7. Jun 04, 03:44
Catra, you appear to be the troll.Catra wrote:if you stopped trolling and midly educated yourself, you would find it easily countered in the WAR! section. he left out the remaining portion of that segment that details what options you have as a terran commander.Skinmeister wrote:Yeah you're right in that it wasn't said in this thread, I read the title too quickly. It was still only five days ago though, which is the important part.EmperorJon wrote:Firstly, that wasn't in this thread, and secondly, it was said when someone asked. They answered a question. How can you blame them for that?
The matter we 'blame' them for is previously having told us everything apart from the main plot would be available for Terrans, when this was a lie.
This post sums everything up perfectly, and has yet to be countered.WeriTis wrote:Thank you for reminding me on that one.Catra wrote:it was recommended for new players because it was a tutorial plot. =P after that if you wanted to play terran again theres was a USC commander and the aldran adventurer, and you picked one depending if you wanted to redo the first half of the terran plotline or not.
and mr. egosoft representative (CBJ) DID state in the survival guide under the WAR! section that only the argon side of the war had plots enabled."*THE* plot". "Does NOT limit your other options in the game".CBJ wrote: The main game plot story is available from the Argon Peacekeeper gamestart but not the Terran Commander one.
Aside from the plot, choosing one of these gamestarts does not limit your other options in the game.
I can not see how this is a totally clear statement to not expect future plots and most of all how this is an announcement that one of the game starts would not feature PHQ/HUB/UFJD, which are pretty much implied by "other options in the game".
So no, Catra, i understand you're valiantly trying to defend ES out of whatever mislead fanboy reasons ever, but what you said is simply not true.
Also, the terran defender start was not only a tutorial start - i played my longest game of TC ever from that gamestart. Trying to diminish the role of the past terran defender start to counter my argument is a bit questionable.
And you're very wrong on the subject, egosoft stated specificly that other than the main plot, Terran starts would not miss out on other elements of the game.
Patch notes have labeled Hub/PHQ as mini plot's. Therefore, not the main plot. Therefore, Terran starts are missing out on other elements of the game. (Altogether, over 50% of the god damn gameplay)
Last edited by dlryan on Sun, 26. Feb 12, 19:48, edited 1 time in total.
AMD FX 8core 8150 4.5ghz(overclocked)4x8gb ram, ATI Crossfire Radeon 7850HD x2. Sabertooth 990fx mobo
-
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: Sat, 14. Jan 06, 21:29
*Listens to the dissent* 
Guys, lets try to be civil. It's a game after all. There's no need for name calling or personal insults.
< Totally agreed. Not only is it uncalled for but it is against forum rules and will result in action taken against individuals if it persists. If anyone considers that they are being upset by trolling posts then do not rise to the bait or make accusations in the forum but just PM a Moderator and we will take it from there. We cannot act further in this case as responding posts infringed many forum rules as well and our only recourse now would be to brutalise or lock the thread. Alan Phipps, Moderator.>

Guys, lets try to be civil. It's a game after all. There's no need for name calling or personal insults.
< Totally agreed. Not only is it uncalled for but it is against forum rules and will result in action taken against individuals if it persists. If anyone considers that they are being upset by trolling posts then do not rise to the bait or make accusations in the forum but just PM a Moderator and we will take it from there. We cannot act further in this case as responding posts infringed many forum rules as well and our only recourse now would be to brutalise or lock the thread. Alan Phipps, Moderator.>
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Fri, 19. Nov 10, 06:23
Catra has a way of bringing out the worst in people - but you are correct.eldyranx3 wrote:*Listens to the dissent*
Guys, lets try to be civil. It's a game after all. There's no need for name calling or personal insults.
I am hoping egosoft simply adds the availability to AP terran players, even if it will cost 250-500 mil for each piece or so.
Question, I am aware that other starts can access the War plot apparently, does anyone know if Terran Defender can? (Not Commander).
-
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sat, 26. Nov 05, 17:54
-
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Sun, 6. Jul 08, 10:29
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat, 29. Oct 11, 20:19
does it work if you just cheat it in? you can always take something like 300 millions of your account to pretend that you "bought" it?TTD wrote:seconded !
I do not usually play Terran,but I am hoping to in this game.
However,if the PHQ/UFJD does not make it to Terran Start,I do not see a reason to play those starts.
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 54284
- Joined: Tue, 29. Apr 03, 00:56
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Mon, 30. May 11, 19:53
Especially as it looks like you need to go modified when you play Terran anyway...Jumee wrote:does it work if you just cheat it in? you can always take something like 300 millions of your account to pretend that you "bought" it?TTD wrote:seconded !
I do not usually play Terran,but I am hoping to in this game.
However,if the PHQ/UFJD does not make it to Terran Start,I do not see a reason to play those starts.
-
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Sun, 6. Jul 08, 10:29
UFJD works.wRAR wrote:Especially as it looks like you need to go modified when you play Terran anyway...Jumee wrote:does it work if you just cheat it in? you can always take something like 300 millions of your account to pretend that you "bought" it?TTD wrote:seconded !
I do not usually play Terran,but I am hoping to in this game.
However,if the PHQ/UFJD does not make it to Terran Start,I do not see a reason to play those starts.
PHQ has not got RE function
Hub sector cannot be connected without additional mods.
Using Cycrow's Cheat package.
There is a mod which connects any gate to any gate,which might work with this.
There might be a PHQ Mod which is more functional.
Ask in S/M forum
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun, 26. Feb 12, 21:22
To throw my two cents in:
I can understand at least the main plot, because AP seems very Argon-centric. Although I don't know why they couldn't also have something from a terran perspective (most games do have missions for both warring sides). But that's another story, as I never fully understood the deal with the Terran Conflict main plot either. (honestly it didn't feel like a cold war of any sort and at times felt downright confusing)
But for player headquarters (and maybe the HUB, more so for the headquarters) it strikes me as very odd. If playing terran disables the main plot and is intended for a challenging "sandbox" play, isn't a player headquarters a worthy "end-game" sandbox goal to reach when building an economic empire? And starting terran would definitely be classified as "hard mode sandbox play". So why not just make it harder, but still achievable?
The decision -not- to include these features for terrans goes against the whole idea behind sandbox play, where the player can do whatever they want. Make it harder for terrans to get access, make it where the mission is you have to bribe corrupt officials. But to say no, your side isn't going to win and is just a suicidal game mode (without such a disclaimer) to try and play seems...lazy.
If its because you're going for whatever story canon exists out there, well how often do you see C&C games where playing as NOD results in the bad guys winning! Have a non-canon end for pete's sake. Afterall it is a sandbox...
I did enjoy TC and I was enjoying AP (and waiting for player headquarters). But it doesn't quite matter anymore, as I lost those saved games wrestling with a computer failure the last few weeks. So I guess I'm starting Humble Merchant to enjoy playing with Terran ships...
I can understand at least the main plot, because AP seems very Argon-centric. Although I don't know why they couldn't also have something from a terran perspective (most games do have missions for both warring sides). But that's another story, as I never fully understood the deal with the Terran Conflict main plot either. (honestly it didn't feel like a cold war of any sort and at times felt downright confusing)
But for player headquarters (and maybe the HUB, more so for the headquarters) it strikes me as very odd. If playing terran disables the main plot and is intended for a challenging "sandbox" play, isn't a player headquarters a worthy "end-game" sandbox goal to reach when building an economic empire? And starting terran would definitely be classified as "hard mode sandbox play". So why not just make it harder, but still achievable?
The decision -not- to include these features for terrans goes against the whole idea behind sandbox play, where the player can do whatever they want. Make it harder for terrans to get access, make it where the mission is you have to bribe corrupt officials. But to say no, your side isn't going to win and is just a suicidal game mode (without such a disclaimer) to try and play seems...lazy.
If its because you're going for whatever story canon exists out there, well how often do you see C&C games where playing as NOD results in the bad guys winning! Have a non-canon end for pete's sake. Afterall it is a sandbox...
I did enjoy TC and I was enjoying AP (and waiting for player headquarters). But it doesn't quite matter anymore, as I lost those saved games wrestling with a computer failure the last few weeks. So I guess I'm starting Humble Merchant to enjoy playing with Terran ships...
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat, 29. Oct 11, 20:19
I think the reason behind not having PHQ/Hub/UFJD is not really a matter of story/cannon/whatever but a matter of time or to be more precise lack of it.Starnick wrote:To throw my two cents in:
I can understand at least the main plot, because AP seems very Argon-centric. Although I don't know why they couldn't also have something from a terran perspective (most games do have missions for both warring sides). But that's another story, as I never fully understood the deal with the Terran Conflict main plot either. (honestly it didn't feel like a cold war of any sort and at times felt downright confusing)
But for player headquarters (and maybe the HUB, more so for the headquarters) it strikes me as very odd. If playing terran disables the main plot and is intended for a challenging "sandbox" play, isn't a player headquarters a worthy "end-game" sandbox goal to reach when building an economic empire? And starting terran would definitely be classified as "hard mode sandbox play". So why not just make it harder, but still achievable?
The decision -not- to include these features for terrans goes against the whole idea behind sandbox play, where the player can do whatever they want. Make it harder for terrans to get access, make it where the mission is you have to bribe corrupt officials. But to say no, your side isn't going to win and is just a suicidal game mode (without such a disclaimer) to try and play seems...lazy.
If its because you're going for whatever story canon exists out there, well how often do you see C&C games where playing as NOD results in the bad guys winning! Have a non-canon end for pete's sake. Afterall it is a sandbox...
I did enjoy TC and I was enjoying AP (and waiting for player headquarters). But it doesn't quite matter anymore, as I lost those saved games wrestling with a computer failure the last few weeks. So I guess I'm starting Humble Merchant to enjoy playing with Terran ships...
-
- Posts: 7754
- Joined: Mon, 12. Oct 09, 21:54
-
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Sat, 29. Oct 11, 20:19
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Tue, 28. Dec 10, 16:11
Jesus, stop your crying already.dlryan wrote:No hub/HQ if you play Terran...
The Hub plot took up well over 50% of my time doing anything in X3 TC.
I much prefer playing Terran.
Do you see what I am getting at?
I appreciate the work on the patch and the weekend release, but that has removed half the game for every Terran player. Thanks but no thanks. I will continue to play TC exclusively.
There's a reason many people didn't play AP; It was for the HUB/HQ. This patch does absolutely nothing for those playing Terran. (Guess that's a good 50% of players maybe?)
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Wed, 16. Mar 11, 14:12
The only one "crying" here is you. Your post is pure flame, while the post you quoted had listed reasons.DarkKlown77 wrote: Jesus, stop your crying already.
"An open mind is like a fortress with its gate unbarred and unguarded."
dzhedzho wrote: Trade - insults with other community members, or tips how to improve performance
Fight - with steam for refund, or the overwhelming feeling of hopelessness
Build - your patience and knowledge of xml save editing.
Think - before you preorder next time
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Tue, 28. Dec 10, 16:11