
Further, even if doing so at a library or


Internet for gamming has been fairly non optional for over 10 years.... and I do not miss buying pcgamer hoping it had a patch for one of the games I owned

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
Yep, people sure claim a lot about Steam.Honved wrote:Steam = no sale. I have no internet access to the floor with my gaming PC, and I'm not about to rewire the building at my own expense just to play it. Besides, I prefer having the physical disc and box over a digital download. There have been download services in the past that went financially down the toilet, and anyone who bought games through them were out of luck when they suddenly couldn't access their accounts. Bethesda Softworks' game Skyrim is due out next month, and will REQUIRE Steam for activation, even if you own the disc. It's been claimed that if you have any "issue" with Steam, they will cancel your account and not allow you to create another, EVEN IF YOU BUY ANOTHER COPY. Quite simply, I can't and won't play X Rebirth if it requires Steam. Hopefully the X-games won't go down that same road where I cannot and will not follow.
Anecdotal evidence is always conflicting when it comes to this.Texhnolyzed wrote:Regarding worries about not being able to start X: Rebirth in offline mode if it turns out to be a Steamworks game. I doubt that that will be an issue. I can start Fallout: New Vegas, which is a Steamworks game as well, just fine in offline mode. The same goes for all my Steamworks games, which are quite a few.
Ketraar politely suggested a few pages back to stop attacking people with different experiences/opinions regarding Steam. I'm reiterating it now a little stronger. Feel free to discuss the merits and demerits of Steam, but enough with the belittling of those who don't agree with your opinion or experience. If people can't keep it civil, without attacking someone else's opinion, then this thread will descend to the depths. Clear enough?Incubi wrote:Amazing how many people with no access are posting on this internet site!
Further, even if doing so at a library orworks computer ( shame on you
) How on earth have you patched your games?...
Its not about internet access, but bandwidth.Incubi wrote:but lightheartedly pointing out how people without internet access are accessing it somehow to post.
......
No internet is very limiting nearly impossible now a days. Asking for a dos version of the game because you do not have windows is to par with this claim. Saying no internet access when you are posting on the internet is a little silly IMO.
It doesn't have much of an intellectual thing to me. Here is what I sent the moderator about the reason behind my post. I originally post it here, but removed it and sent it via PM. But since now you insist, I'll give it to you:apricotslice wrote: This is an intelectual discussion for me.
But, with all due respect, in order to have a so call "discussion" ( a proper one anyway) then the participants have to be hold accountable for what they say. He is free to dislike steam and we can all respect that, he does not even need to provide reasons.
But if he participate in a "discussion" and give his reason to dislike then we are reasonably expect it to be coherent. I don't have problem with people just saying they don't like my school. But if they move on and give reason, I would fully expect it to be sensible. I'm sure you won't stop anyone from saying they hate Egosoft on the forum, but I would think if they start grabbing for every straw, true or false, reasonable or unreasonable to ditch Egosoft then I would think some of you would intervene. Samething here, I hope you understand.
No, I am not trying to convert you. But if you make a false or unreasonable point, I'm obliged to point it out. Put it this way, I am not pointing out you are wrong to convert you, I am pointing out you are unreasonable to inform you that you are unreasonable, and even more important, I am pointing out you are unreasonable so the people reading your message know that you are unreasonable. There are a lot of people on both side reading this threads, both steam lovers and steam haters. But there are also of people who are on the fence, and I want to give them a reasonable chance to try the system to see whether they like it or not, or at least to see if they can deal with it or not.You cant convert me. Stop trying.
But "coherent" and "sensible" vary according to whos judging. What fails for you, is fine for others.Mightysword wrote:But if he participate in a "discussion" and give his reason to dislike then we are reasonably expect it to be coherent. I don't have problem with people just saying they don't like my school. But if they move on and give reason, I would fully expect it to be sensible.
Thats just your opinion. And your ignoring that I'm not making any attempt to be "reasonable", the same as I'm not trying to be "coherent" and "sensible". I'm just stating what I want, which is the choice to use steam or not use steam.I am pointing out you are unreasonable to inform you that you are unreasonable
And I want them to have the ability to choose either way.But there are also of people who are on the fence, and I want to give them a reasonable chance to try the system to see whether they like it or not, or at least to see if they can deal with it or not.
I'm not even pretending to be neutral. I dont want steam on my computer. Period. Cant be more non-neutral than that.I don't think your posts is as self-centric and neutral as you claim,
Exactly so. Nearly 200 people here have agreed with me. Much to my surprise.but even if they are, they effect more people then just yourself.
I've never said that. I have reservations about the way the game is going, and I refuse to use steam. Neither is disliking the game.You are free to continue saying how you dislike the game,
[sarcasm mode on] How very nice of you. [Sarcasm mode off].and I will continue point out your mistake
Please do.The alternative is just to ignore your post in this thread
I think this is the real reason; maintaining multiple distribution methods is a gigantic pain in the butt for a small company and would consume a large chunk of developer resources to troubleshoot.The steam market is far better for an editor than any DRM system. It probably costs more per game to go with steam, but the potential sales are a lot larger than a normal release.
Where on earth did you get that from ?epimannn wrote:You dont want steam.
You dont want any DRM.
You dont want any copy protection..
Incubi wrote:74 pages. Easy to miss warnings.
At anyrate, I was not attacking anyone, but lightheartedly pointing out how people without internet access are accessing it somehow to post. SO not understanding that arguement, also pointing out that internet access has been a soft requirement for over a decade now, Some operasting systems even require it to activate.
There is hysteria in this thread so it was easy to get light heartedly dodgy about it, no intense attack intended. Obviously there are other reasons to resent steam requirements, but it should be kept within reason.
I think it is safe to assume it got a little hostile as well ( I missed that part ) or I would have had more care in my post. My point remains the same regardless, just minus the /poke now.
No internet is very limiting nearly impossible now a days. Asking for a dos version of the game because you do not have windows is to par with this claim. Saying no internet access when you are posting on the internet is a little silly IMO. I am sure there is a way to deal with this.
If the game is released in a way that you still have an hour of downloads to do even when purchasing a dvd... erghh I am with those people I hate that and it would limit some users.
Joking aside, I am very serious about playing XR in offline mode. My job requires me to be at customers' site often. Waiting at the airport, or being stranded due to a snow storm in Chicago O'Hare airport for 7 hours is no fun if you can't get online to kill time.Incubi wrote:Amazing how many people with no access are posting on this internet site!
Further, even if doing so at a library orworks computer ( shame on you
) How on earth have you patched your games?
Internet for gamming has been fairly non optional for over 10 years.... and I do not miss buying pcgamer hoping it had a patch for one of the games I owned
That almost looks like a deliberate attempt to get the thread locked, which is why I'm just going to rebuke it and leave the thread open. Piracy discussion isn't welcome.bobxii wrote:Gee, there's a whole lot of hate running around for a least-intrusive DRM program cum distribution platform for a single player game - the best possible target for piracy...
Thankyou.esd wrote:That almost looks like a deliberate attempt to get the thread locked, which is why I'm just going to rebuke it and leave the thread open.
VincentTH wrote:Joking aside, I am very serious about playing XR in offline mode. My job requires me to be at customers' site often. Waiting at the airport, or being stranded due to a snow storm in Chicago O'Hare airport for 7 hours is no fun if you can't get online to kill time.Incubi wrote:Amazing how many people with no access are posting on this internet site!
Further, even if doing so at a library orworks computer ( shame on you
) How on earth have you patched your games?
Internet for gamming has been fairly non optional for over 10 years.... and I do not miss buying pcgamer hoping it had a patch for one of the games I owned