alt3rn1ty wrote: ↑Mon, 1. Dec 25, 21:07
Only 60fps cap and Frame Gen x2, so you are only getting 30 fps real frames, and 30 for Frame Gen.
At that cap you would be better at frame gen x1 .. Which is kind of limiting the power you have available to use with your shiny new 5070Ti
Try 120 fps cap, and Frame gen x2, or even
180 fps cap and Frame Gen x3
Unleash the beast
Remember when we were beta testing the addition of Frame Generation, I also tried 60 fps cap, and x2 or above frame gen was not very good, until I realised I needed more headroom for Frame Gen to spread its wings.
Yeah, that's right... it can't "top-up" frames so to speak, that'd really mess with input if it could. I did do some testing with a 120fps limit set in the game, and it's better. Both 3x and 4x give nice results. However, it's only a better experience when watching a battle. Walking around a ship isn't the best experience. I'll tinker some more. PC current in bits again as water block due to arrive soon.
Oh, I did tinker with settings the frame rate limit to 280 - which was the max value it allowed before going unlimited - I then sat at my G-Sync monitor's set 120fps (it goes higher, but 120hz is the highest you can go and keep HDR on. HDR is nice).
More tinkering to be done, but I've got block fitment and leak testing first... hurry up Mr. Postman.
As an aside: The 5070Ti is quite a nice card. It's doing almost exactly double the fps vs. the 3070 in the various 3DMark (free) tests. It's also managing that inexplicable, but real, "thing" that is the "feels better" thing. I.e. I have games I've set to 60fps. 3070 managed 60fps just fine. 5070Ti obviously does 60fps just fine, but feels nice doing it. Wasn't really wanting to get a new GPU just yet, 3070 was still doing great, but market pressure got me lol.
I hope nVidia continue to refine frame Generation and
not improve it and go "60 series only". It has it's place, but give me real frames every time where possible.