X4 needs more economic challenge

This forum is the ideal place for all discussion relating to X4. You will also find additional information from developers here.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

Imperial Good
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)
Posts: 4759
Joined: Fri, 21. Dec 18, 18:23
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Imperial Good » Thu, 27. Jun 19, 13:50

adeine wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 06:58
Right now workforce is basically irrelevant
Workforce is relevant. It makes a huge difference in the profitability and efficiency of stations. Some stations like raw material refineries will struggle to break even without workforce as far as value in to out goes.

adeine
Posts: 1105
Joined: Thu, 31. Aug 17, 17:34
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by adeine » Thu, 27. Jun 19, 13:55

Imperial Good wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 13:50
Some stations like raw material refineries will struggle to break even without workforce as far as value in to out goes.
You can easily make them self sustaining/endless money machines, workforce or no.

Imperial Good
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)
Posts: 4759
Joined: Fri, 21. Dec 18, 18:23
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Imperial Good » Thu, 27. Jun 19, 20:27

adeine wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 13:55
You can easily make them self sustaining/endless money machines, workforce or no.
Yes but with workforce they are even better as the same number of modules produce more from the same inputs.

adeine
Posts: 1105
Joined: Thu, 31. Aug 17, 17:34
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by adeine » Thu, 27. Jun 19, 21:24

Imperial Good wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 20:27
Yes but with workforce they are even better as the same number of modules produce more from the same inputs.
Not the same inputs as you have to factor in workforce consumption, making setting up the station in the first place exponentially more expensive (and rely on more base product).

Yes it's technically worth doing, but hardly necessary or a game changer so not exactly relevant. I honestly mostly do it for immersion reasons as opposed to gameplay benefit. In my opinion no workforce = no production (and then scale up accordingly) would be the way to make it actually meaningful - although obviously we'd need TPs/other ways to ferry workforce to boost new stations.

Imperial Good
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)
Posts: 4759
Joined: Fri, 21. Dec 18, 18:23
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Imperial Good » Fri, 28. Jun 19, 06:13

adeine wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 21:24
Not the same inputs as you have to factor in workforce consumption, making setting up the station in the first place exponentially more expensive (and rely on more base product).
Workforce is very cheap to maintain. All except the largest of factories can get away with buying in food from dedicated food factories as producing food at any reasonable scale is enough for 10,000s of workers.

Even buying food from the AI you often can get away with very low buy prices and food has one of the largest min to max percentage deltas.

RodentofDoom
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat, 27. Feb 16, 09:37
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by RodentofDoom » Fri, 28. Jun 19, 13:03

X3 was full of 'features'
they cleared out the useless crap for x4

this falls into the area of "personal bias" and that's what mods are for

User avatar
spankahontis
Posts: 3242
Joined: Tue, 2. Nov 10, 21:47
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by spankahontis » Tue, 9. Jul 19, 19:09

Falcrack wrote:
Wed, 26. Jun 19, 04:08
Warnoise wrote:
Wed, 26. Jun 19, 03:17
Add taxes (or rental fees) when building in pre-owned sectors. bam fixed.
Then you would still have the issue of no running costs for ships, or stations in unowned sectors. So not quite fixed to my satisfaction, but better than what we have currently!

I may be wrong, but I don't think any of what I have suggested would be impossible or even all that difficult to implement. Might require some balancing to find a sweet spot to make it fun and challenging, but not impossible.

I made the argument that staff should have a weekly wage or a small percentage of every ware sold; heck someone made a mod that gave workers a wage in X:Rebirth.
I believe Egosoft members that visit here displayed a disinterest about such ideas, to stick with the one-off payment model for staff.

But I'd love to see Egosoft implement a 'Civilian Economy' that isn't based around ship building. Pops demanding more than just Food and Medical Supplies. Habitation Stations that aren't based around manufacturing, but living space for pops, a Taxes/Rent slider would cover the costs, high taxes make you money but cause residents to leave, lower taxes bringing in more NPCs.
Being a property mogul rather than a factory mogul?

I felt that in X:Rebirth: Home of Light Expansion, those tiny stations around Home of Lights Highway as well as those Terran Habitation Stations could of had purpose other than being mostly things to look at. Those little factories could of been making products for Civilian use; Item Trading could of been so much more than just an instant way to buy low, sell high mechanics for starters to the campaign.
Ragna-Tech.. Forging a Better Tomorrow!

My most annoying Bugs list 6.0 Beta 4 + [All DLC]
--------------------------------
Nvidium Worshop Animation Enlarge Broken :(
Building Modules causes low frame rate :o
Massive Framerate drops freezing game! :doh:
Save Corrupted Fixed the Crash! :-D

pref
Posts: 5605
Joined: Sat, 10. Nov 12, 17:55
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by pref » Wed, 10. Jul 19, 15:48

Not sure paying tax or any recurring costs would present any challenge. These things just change cost/income balance - might be needed with current game state, i don't know about that, but it won't really add anything to the game imo.

Economic challenge in my book is to be able to use the economy towards a mean, that grants the player bonuses and overcoming it is not trivial/tedious repetition.
Some X3 examples would be setting up a production/trade network to get better weapons for your capships, not just corvette level ones.
Being able to alter the traffic via building the HUB.
Getting specific goodies by feeding specific parts of the economy.
Being able to maintain sat coverage by building the needed infrastructure and so on.

Also having all meaningful production tied to shipyards is a problem as because of this you either get everything in case a SY is well supplied or nothing, not even ships.

The way things stand right now generally there isn't enough control to do anything like that as you cannot even route wares so they serve a purpose.
Trade AI scripts lack proper options and variety.
The only purpose current eco has is to get more money due to player having no way to be more specific than that.
Solving this problem is a prerequisite for any real economic challenge.
Hope this becomes a priority at some point, as the lack of economic gameplay is probably the main reasons X4 gets boring way quicker then X3 did.

Karmaticdamage
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri, 16. Sep 11, 00:15
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Karmaticdamage » Thu, 11. Jul 19, 14:05

Wharfs and shipyards are really the problem when it comes to getting too rich too fast. Within one ingame day after putting up a wharf, you can have a shipyard put up, and have every blueprint in the game. You go from having only tens of millions on hand to having FU money in a massive leap. Factions buy ships non stop even at 150% price. It doesn't matter what kind of fees, restrictions, or other handicaps you put on any other aspect of the game. As soon as your wharf goes up, money is no longer a concern.

photomankc
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed, 16. Jul 14, 15:01

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by photomankc » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 17:37

I'm going to have to grudgingly agree on the economic challenge. Stations are okay. They make decent money but they take a good long while to start overflowing to you. The money from a few stations will get you in a position to build fleets of L/S and a few M's pretty nicely but I was not rolling in cash or anything. Replacing losses kept the income tied up and several times I would need to raid the funds before they overflowed to get some breathing room. Then you build a warf and suddenly you go from a few million per hour, to hundreds of million per hour even if all you can get blueprints to are S ships and weapons. Now EVERYTHING is chump change.

I really think it should be rare to have the other races buying ships from you and to entice them to do so should require a significant discount of the ship price unless they are unable to satisfy their own orders. Now, unfortunately the other aspect of the economy cuts in here because I'm many days into the game and the factions still have a hard time stocking the shipyards. They seem to slowly deal with the shortages but there seems to always be another shortage waiting in line so they are building using my warf because they have to. I think you could hold it off somewhat by making you wait until +25 relations or maybe even +30 to allow the purchase of shipbuilding modules and ship hull blueprints. That's just a delay tactic but it's been my experience that in casual play, getting to +30 takes a good bit of time. I'm still in the low 20's with a few that are increasing due to trade at 5 days in so that could at least hold back the damn break of cash from the player warf.

I'm not sure it would be easy to make the manufacture of the ships more expensive organically without running into balancing issues with all the other wares. I suppose the arrangement could be altered so that you 'license' the production and your cut is ___% of the sale, and the rest goes to the faction that holds the design. That would at least put some brakes on the cart.

Raevyan
Posts: 1463
Joined: Sat, 4. Oct 08, 17:35
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Raevyan » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 17:51

If you ask me any attempts to balance the economy or make it more challenging is useless unless the underlying ai is fixed. Most problems only occur because the ai is really bad. If you implement balancing around a bad ai and at some point someone fixes the ai you generate a new problem.

I really wish egosoft would fix the problems with the ai first before they implement changes to the symptoms. My universe is going overboard with smart chip stations. Yards and wharfs are out of stock, smart chip stations are full. The ai is not able to distribute them and instead building more smart chip stations. Also I got the feeling that the ai got worse compared to rebirth. At least the combat ai. If you give an attack order the ship will fly to the targets position when you have the order. When it arrives it will do the same again. Never saw that kind of behavior in Rebirth (correct me if I am wrong).

photomankc
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed, 16. Jul 14, 15:01

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by photomankc » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 18:13

rene6740 wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 17:51
My universe is going overboard with smart chip stations. Yards and wharfs are out of stock, smart chip stations are full. The ai is not able to distribute them and instead building more smart chip stations. Also I got the feeling that the ai got worse compared to rebirth. At least the combat ai. If you give an attack order the ship will fly to the targets position when you have the order. When it arrives it will do the same again. Never saw that kind of behavior in Rebirth (correct me if I am wrong).
I'm seeing this too... but only to some extent. Some other products are in actual short supply, but the yards do seem to run out or stay low on products that are not at all hard to find.

User avatar
spankahontis
Posts: 3242
Joined: Tue, 2. Nov 10, 21:47
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by spankahontis » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 20:14

Karmaticdamage wrote:
Thu, 11. Jul 19, 14:05
Wharfs and shipyards are really the problem when it comes to getting too rich too fast. Within one ingame day after putting up a wharf, you can have a shipyard put up, and have every blueprint in the game. You go from having only tens of millions on hand to having FU money in a massive leap. Factions buy ships non stop even at 150% price. It doesn't matter what kind of fees, restrictions, or other handicaps you put on any other aspect of the game. As soon as your wharf goes up, money is no longer a concern.

I've found that as well, you build a factory, you slide the price you'll pay for materials to 0% and they arrive at your construction site just as fast as if you moved the price to 100%? It's redundant.

I don't understand how building a Mega-Factory makes so much money when everywhere is bottlenecked, Factories are all full.. Even the shortages at the Equip. Docks, Wharfs and Shipyards at the beginning are resolved when the economy goes into expansion.

Xenon should be working to cull the number of Stations by building Fleets of Destroyers and sending them off to clean Sectors of Stations, shake up the economy.

IDK, maybe 50 or more New Sectors? Some new Factions with conflicts to expand the War mechanic? Maybe even make the Xenon into 2 Factions? One that builds Stations and pushes into Neighbouring Sectors, while the other Factions job is to randomly raid a Sector with large fleets of Destroyers.
At any rate, this Economy needs an enema!
Imperial Good wrote:
Thu, 27. Jun 19, 03:01
Too low level to be simulated. The game is performance issue prone as is due to the sand box nature. Let alone with 5,000 more small ships running all over the place.

Habitation is large, the size of towns considering they house 1,000 people. It is also the future, in space. I would expect supply deliveries to their habitation make the most sense as it exposes them less to the dangers of space as well as allows for the most efficient transport. If they want to travel between stations then they should be using commuter ships such as L passenger transports. They could use these to go to large shopping hubs and leisure/recreational facilities which might only be available/make economic sense at huge stations or one per sector.

Rebirth the Home of Light Expansion, it looked like they were doing that, those little stations on the highways. They'd of been awesome places for pops in that sector to visit and trade in.
But they were just Eye-Candy.

Increasing the Population in a Sector could of lead to these "Special Population" buildings/modules that can only be built if there is a large enough population in that Sector to unlock them or make them run at optimal efficiency.
- An Arcade/Casino. Requires electrical goods, food, medical supplies, water and other wares to run properly.
- A Botanical Garden for nature lovers. It requires water, Med supplies and other wares to function.
- A Mega Shopping Complex. Will take allot of items and serves as a Trade Hub, you're more likely to find what you're looking for (Unlike a Traders Corners) Though it would need balancing?
- A Pleasure Palace. Found in Pirate Sectors as they are places of debauchery, drugs and other vice. Require Illegal Wares to run properly.

Just a few ideas. The Races could have similar buildings that best fit their culture so you have ample variety.
Habitations are Race specific anywhere, you build an Argon Habitation, only Argon move in. So certain special buildings require a certain Habitation population?
photomankc wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 17:37
I'm going to have to grudgingly agree on the economic challenge. Stations are okay. They make decent money but they take a good long while to start overflowing to you. The money from a few stations will get you in a position to build fleets of L/S and a few M's pretty nicely but I was not rolling in cash or anything. Replacing losses kept the income tied up and several times I would need to raid the funds before they overflowed to get some breathing room. Then you build a warf and suddenly you go from a few million per hour, to hundreds of million per hour even if all you can get blueprints to are S ships and weapons. Now EVERYTHING is chump change.
Especially if you build The Wharf and connect it with all the Factories lower end to High-tech to provide the Wharf with everything it needs to just roll out Ships at a none stop rate.
I did that before, made this mega-self sustaining factory that made everything and connected a Shipyard Cradle to it and I had a near endless flow of credits coming in, rolling out several fleets to raid Xenon Sectors.
Just before that bug hit that made ships stay in the cradle because they were missing a particular item like a drone even though I had a full stock of them and blockaded my cradles.

They just can't seem to win. lol
Ragna-Tech.. Forging a Better Tomorrow!

My most annoying Bugs list 6.0 Beta 4 + [All DLC]
--------------------------------
Nvidium Worshop Animation Enlarge Broken :(
Building Modules causes low frame rate :o
Massive Framerate drops freezing game! :doh:
Save Corrupted Fixed the Crash! :-D

Imperial Good
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)
Posts: 4759
Joined: Fri, 21. Dec 18, 18:23
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Imperial Good » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:06

spankahontis wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 20:14
Habitations are Race specific anywhere, you build an Argon Habitation, only Argon move in. So certain special buildings require a certain Habitation population?
Actually habitation is not entirely race specific. Yes most of the people moving in are of that race, however nothing stops other races from also living there. This is seen in HOP space where HOP only own Paranid habitation but there is still a diverse population of Split, Teladi and Argon living at their stations. Lore wise most factions can eat the common food of each other, just many prefer not to.

User avatar
spankahontis
Posts: 3242
Joined: Tue, 2. Nov 10, 21:47
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by spankahontis » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:11

Imperial Good wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:06
spankahontis wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 20:14
Habitations are Race specific anywhere, you build an Argon Habitation, only Argon move in. So certain special buildings require a certain Habitation population?
Actually habitation is not entirely race specific. Yes most of the people moving in are of that race, however nothing stops other races from also living there. This is seen in HOP space where HOP only own Paranid habitation but there is still a diverse population of Split, Teladi and Argon living at their stations. Lore wise most factions can eat the common food of each other, just many prefer not to.

Odd, cause i'm sure the Habitations say they are Race specific, you're right the Docks do have all Races on them?
Could of sworn I saw it somewhere?
Ragna-Tech.. Forging a Better Tomorrow!

My most annoying Bugs list 6.0 Beta 4 + [All DLC]
--------------------------------
Nvidium Worshop Animation Enlarge Broken :(
Building Modules causes low frame rate :o
Massive Framerate drops freezing game! :doh:
Save Corrupted Fixed the Crash! :-D

Raevyan
Posts: 1463
Joined: Sat, 4. Oct 08, 17:35
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Raevyan » Mon, 15. Jul 19, 22:16

One might get the impression that ai is spawned to buy at player stations and/or to prefer player stations instead of buying lower on other npc stations. I also accepted some build missions to build more smart chip factories.
One thing I also noticed is that when you build a station npc's are flooding your build storage as if they were waiting for you. The longer I play the more I get the impression that ai ships are spawned to supply player station building. They are not able to distribute wares even within a sector but if you build a station 10 freighters are suddenly on the way.

Falcrack
Posts: 4988
Joined: Wed, 29. Jul 09, 00:46
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Falcrack » Tue, 16. Jul 19, 02:27

rene6740 wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 22:16
One might get the impression that ai is spawned to buy at player stations and/or to prefer player stations instead of buying lower on other npc stations. I also accepted some build missions to build more smart chip factories.
One thing I also noticed is that when you build a station npc's are flooding your build storage as if they were waiting for you. The longer I play the more I get the impression that ai ships are spawned to supply player station building. They are not able to distribute wares even within a sector but if you build a station 10 freighters are suddenly on the way.
With the ware reservation system, it does not take long for ware reservations to be made, even if the freighters making the reservation are several sectors away. So no, not that surprising when the ware reservations fill up so quickly, the supply ships are not being spawned from nowhere to build your station.

Karmaticdamage
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri, 16. Sep 11, 00:15
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by Karmaticdamage » Tue, 16. Jul 19, 04:52

spankahontis wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:11
Imperial Good wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:06
spankahontis wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 20:14
Habitations are Race specific anywhere, you build an Argon Habitation, only Argon move in. So certain special buildings require a certain Habitation population?
Actually habitation is not entirely race specific. Yes most of the people moving in are of that race, however nothing stops other races from also living there. This is seen in HOP space where HOP only own Paranid habitation but there is still a diverse population of Split, Teladi and Argon living at their stations. Lore wise most factions can eat the common food of each other, just many prefer not to.

Odd, cause i'm sure the Habitations say they are Race specific, you're right the Docks do have all Races on them?
Could of sworn I saw it somewhere?
Argon habitat only has argon workers, Teladi and Paranid habitats give you a diverse group of argon,teladi,split and paranid. Its probably an oversight.

User avatar
spankahontis
Posts: 3242
Joined: Tue, 2. Nov 10, 21:47
x4

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by spankahontis » Tue, 16. Jul 19, 18:42

Karmaticdamage wrote:
Tue, 16. Jul 19, 04:52
spankahontis wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:11
Imperial Good wrote:
Mon, 15. Jul 19, 21:06
Actually habitation is not entirely race specific. Yes most of the people moving in are of that race, however nothing stops other races from also living there. This is seen in HOP space where HOP only own Paranid habitation but there is still a diverse population of Split, Teladi and Argon living at their stations. Lore wise most factions can eat the common food of each other, just many prefer not to.

Odd, cause i'm sure the Habitations say they are Race specific, you're right the Docks do have all Races on them?
Could of sworn I saw it somewhere?
Argon habitat only has argon workers, Teladi and Paranid habitats give you a diverse group of argon,teladi,split and paranid. Its probably an oversight.
That's probably what it is?
Ragna-Tech.. Forging a Better Tomorrow!

My most annoying Bugs list 6.0 Beta 4 + [All DLC]
--------------------------------
Nvidium Worshop Animation Enlarge Broken :(
Building Modules causes low frame rate :o
Massive Framerate drops freezing game! :doh:
Save Corrupted Fixed the Crash! :-D

capistrc
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat, 22. Jul 17, 18:48
xr

Re: X4 needs more economic challenge

Post by capistrc » Thu, 18. Jul 19, 16:25

I suggest a tally of maintenance costs to be assessed\ each for the following: industry and ships. For industry a 5% of total production converted to credits and a flat cost of 2k for S, 4K M, 10K large, 20K formXl ships. Combat ships get a 25% increase. This will be assessed periodically over a period of time. If this is not paid, a global penalty to production or combat will be assessed. Penalty could be random and can be ‘paid off’ after each period. So if penalty is assessed due to non-payment, they have to wait until next period to remove it. Non-payment gets increase in balance due to interest. Penalties include global reduction of prod of 5% for example. Penalties accumulate.
For ships penalties include 5% shield or wpn penalty for all ships. Again these accumulate.
Cost increase once threshold is reached say total value of stations > 10 mil, 50 mil, 100 and so on. Ship cost increase as well say 50 ships, 100 ships etc. increase is 5% or some order of magnitude due to threshold. That way starting players have minimal impact while huge players will feel it more. Example: 20% cost increase when 100 ships reached etc.
There could be option to concentrate penalty for stations, but ships are global (to make calc simpler). For example, out of 4 factories, set 1 to have no penalty while the rest can take its penalty and spread it among themselves.
Cost of ships can be lowered by adding equip docks, but of course it will have a cost because factory value increased.
Major races do not get penalty due to vast resources and planetary support. Pirates...not sure.
Calculations are such so they won’t require lots of calculations. Running total could be shown in menu.
Penalties should be restrictive for huge empires.
Lastly, a cost involved when accepting rank from race example 10 mil for level 20 or 100m for 25 etc. accepting rank in one race will get penalty in enemies race. If rep goes below 5 of threshold (25 if 30 rep and mil license achieved) will remove benefit and they’d have to work to get it once more. A certain ship threshold will also see a penalty. Ally or not, major races are wary of giving tech to others they feel would be too dangerous if they turn into enemy. Much less if they were allied with an enemy race as well. Player can only achieve rank 30 with one faction (arg and Teladi; hop ...) due to war.
Values up for discussion of course. Thoughts?

Post Reply

Return to “X4: Foundations”