Those 3 would be the number if all had been fully vaccinated. But they aren't.
Around here the rate was - last time I bothered - at about 20%s having had both shots. In my book this means 3 out of 20 out of those > 100.
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
Those 3 would be the number if all had been fully vaccinated. But they aren't.
Don't know. Possibly not known, possibly edge cases like "received vaccine yesterday", possibly an error in one or more of the figures.
Code: Select all
Und wenn ein Forenbösewicht, was Ungezogenes spricht, dann hol' ich meinen Kaktus und der sticht sticht sticht.
/l、
゙(゚、 。 7
l、゙ ~ヽ /
じしf_, )ノ
The data has been misused because it makes the (incorrect) assumption that all deaths occurring post vaccination are caused by vaccination, [...] [This] is grossly irresponsible, particularly for a journal specialising in vaccines
None of the paper’s authors is trained in vaccinology, virology, or epidemiology. They are: [...]
Just general 'all is well' verbiage.The three peer reviewers on the paper, two of them anonymous, did not offer any substantial criticism [...]
, followed by a discussion of some of the paper's shortcomings.It’s very evident from their reviews that they don’t have any topic expertise. The authors don’t either [...]
Code: Select all
/l、
゙(゚、 。 7
l、゙ ~ヽ /
じしf_, )ノ
Code: Select all
/l、
゙(゚、 。 7
l、゙ ~ヽ /
じしf_, )ノ
Code: Select all
/l、
゙(゚、 。 7
l、゙ ~ヽ /
じしf_, )ノ
As someone who is getting older, and collecting conditions which are in no way related to poor diet/lack of exercise (including a respiratory condition which I'm sure would not pair well with covid,) I find this to be a somewhat insulting post. We can't all choose to be young and healthy, you know.mr.WHO wrote: ↑Fri, 2. Jul 21, 12:55IMO, no vaccine will save you if you don't save yourself first.
Notice that before vacination and after vacination majority of deaths is COVID + other conditions.
...
Seriously, at this point, more and more cases will be simply "COVID + stupidity"...or COVID will mutate like a Spanish Flu and will mostly kill young and healthy...in that case, the joke is on me and I'll accept fat f*ck "all you can eat" party over my death bed and grave
Read carefully - I haven't said anything about old people. I said about fat people.eladan wrote: ↑Sun, 4. Jul 21, 01:49As someone who is getting older, and collecting conditions which are in no way related to poor diet/lack of exercise (including a respiratory condition which I'm sure would not pair well with covid,) I find this to be a somewhat insulting post. We can't all choose to be young and healthy, you know.
I would say by mid 30' is when one should be mindful about it. Of course the sooner the better, but that's the latest. And I also I agree about food quality. Even as someone who cook probably 19/20 his own meal, it's still not easy to reach a gold standard in eating healthy in the US simply due to the quality of ingredient available. I had heard the UK is a bit better but I'm not sure. For people who eat out all the times, I feel that essentially a Russian roulette with your health.
I know it's hard to eat healthy and avoid pocessed food and I'm aware that's even harded in US/UK.Mightysword wrote: ↑Sun, 4. Jul 21, 20:36I know that since arrived in the US, I have been eating not even half the amount, but can easily gain weight twice as fast.
I definitely would be one of those fat people you're referring to if I had not make a hard adjustment about a decade ago.
Oh? kinda funny that the FDA daily added sugar intake value is 50g and a large frappuccino has 49g total sugar. While certainly high, that's hardly exceeding a "weekly intake amount".Mightysword wrote: ↑Wed, 7. Jul 21, 00:36The amount of sugar in a typical frap (in the US) is equal or exceed the weekly intake amount
Code: Select all
/l、
゙(゚、 。 7
l、゙ ~ヽ /
じしf_, )ノ
I'm not quite sure how the UK's new policy, namely lifting pretty much all restrictions while we have high rates of infection, fits in with this eminently sensible advice. They've not made it entirely explicit, but the reasoning seems to be something along the lines of letting the infections run riot now while the vaccinations that have been given are still reasonably effective and reduce rates of serious illness and death, thereby hopefully avoiding a winter surge when flu will probably add to the chaos, while at the same time getting closer to herd immunity by having more people with resistance due to having had the virus relatively mildly. This seems like a rather high-risk strategy, given the chances of variants "escaping" the vaccine and resistance from having had the virus before, and I'm not looking forward to the prospect of being one of the lab rats in this experiment.BaronVerde wrote: ↑Wed, 7. Jul 21, 12:58Back to COVID. New variants of the virus are causing concerns. To prevent them from happening it is extremely important that the spread is stopped, and this means besides all other precautionary measures vaccinations.