Post your GPU scores - to prep for next gen cpu's I have 1080ti 3080ti 6900xt included

[Skeeter]

Kinda hoped with the new cpu u got ur fps would have went up alot tho im not sure the 3900 would have held ur gpu back but still if it had the 5950x then it wouldnt have and expected more fps if ur gpu was being limited by the 3900 but seems it wasnt. Shame.

My 6700xt is about the same i think not tested again tho yet, but i dunno if new drivers or not but on a heavy station low 37 fps was a bit smoother when on a station moving the mouse to look about which is where i usually feel the lag. Strange tho cos if u stand still and just watch ship traffic and not move the mouse to look around the ships flying seem smooth, its mainly when u move the mouse or move as in walking where u feel the lag usually. Thats what irks me the most.

[Panos]

Kinda hoped with the new cpu u got ur fps would have went up alot tho im not sure the 3900 would have held ur gpu back but still if it had the 5950x then it wouldnt have and expected more fps if ur gpu was being limited by the 3900 but seems it wasnt. Shame.

My 6700xt is about the same i think not tested again tho yet, but i dunno if new drivers or not but on a heavy station low 37 fps was a bit smoother when on a station moving the mouse to look about which is where i usually feel the lag. Strange tho cos if u stand still and just watch ship traffic and not move the mouse to look around the ships flying seem smooth, its mainly when u move the mouse or move as in walking where u feel the lag usually. Thats what irks me the most.

The 5900X has greatly improve perf on this game but not on the GPU bound scenario.

[brevi]

Okay, ok... WTH am I doing wrong?! I'm running a 3080ti and 8700k with same ram but I can't even get more than 60 fps at the same res as OP (with lower graph-settings and latest Win10 and graph-driver updates).

My game is modded to hell and back tho but I don't know if that should make a deference between hundreds of fps.

WTH am I doing wrong??!!

[Imperial Good]

My game is modded to hell and back tho but I don't know if that should make a deference between hundreds of fps.

WTH am I doing wrong??!!

Your game is "modded to hell and back" which can easily make the difference between hundreds of FPS. For comparisons to be valid you must run the test conditions in an unmodified state, as the topic creator did.

Some mods are script heavy or increase the complexity of the universe substantially which will impact performance. Even playing with or without DLC is likely to impact the performance, however I can only assume the topic creator was playing with DLC as it seems people generally assume all DLCs for such tests.

[Panos]

Okay, ok... WTH am I doing wrong?! I'm running a 3080ti and 8700k with same ram but I can't even get more than 60 fps at the same res as OP (with lower graph-settings and latest Win10 and graph-driver updates).

My game is modded to hell and back tho but I don't know if that should make a deference between hundreds of fps.

WTH am I doing wrong??!!

You test menu screen with the setting yes?

[spookywatcher]

Hey All. Forgot to revisit this. I have upgraded to a 5950x and made the 6900xt the daily driver. So I wanted to revisit this and see if the 5950x helped the 6900xt any in this test.

Setup:

5950x - PBO enabled with manual extreme tweaking of each core on the curve
3600 mhz cl14 - heavily tuned
6900xt power limit raised to 294 watts with overclock of 2555
Same graphics settings as mentioned in post #1

Score = 170 fps So the 5950x was no help in letting the 6900xt stretch it's legs in this scenario

Definitely leaving perf on the table with AMD gpu but I'm still enjoying it. I just set my MSAA to 2x and put the other settings to my preference and it's a great experience.

[Panos]

Kinda hoped with the new cpu u got ur fps would have went up alot tho im not sure the 3900 would have held ur gpu back but still if it had the 5950x then it wouldnt have and expected more fps if ur gpu was being limited by the 3900 but seems it wasnt. Shame.

Definitely leaving perf on the table with AMD gpu but I'm still enjoying it. I just set my MSAA to 2x and put the other settings to my preference and it's a great experience.

Installed new AMD 22.2.1 and 5.0 Beta 3 run the tests tonight.

Code: Select all

5700XT = 109 fps regardless if the ships/spire show 

Previously it was impossible to get over 80fps!!!!!!!!!!!

Over 30% perf increase. I had to triple check the settings, reboot the computer twice and used also the AMD overlay to make sure I wasn't crazy.
With MSAA 2x I get 140fps, that triggered me to run the test again.

Please could you do a sanity check?

From what I see, there was nothing on the 5.0 changelogs about perf improvements on AMD GPUs while AMD 22.2.1 drivers added Vulkan 1.3 support which is streamlining alot of the processes.

[Skeeter]

Not well atm, ill try do test when i can, tho not upgraded to feb drivers yet as well. Tho I did say i thought either 22.1.1 drivers or 4.2 that it felt better at lower frames on stations but i wasnt sure what helped.

[Panos]

Not well atm, ill try do test when i can, tho not upgraded to feb drivers yet as well. Tho I did say i thought either 22.1.1 drivers or 4.2 that it felt better at lower frames on stations but i wasnt sure what helped.

Install 5.0b3 before 22.2.1 drivers to identify if is combination Vulkan 1.3 + 5.0b3 or is just the game.
Tried 22.2.1 and 4.20 and perf drop again to 80fps.