You see both Torus wreck and Earth (all fine):
https://www.egosoft.com/news/images/new ... 25_214.png
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
You see both Torus wreck and Earth (all fine):
Thanks, I was looking for something with a bit more bright green and blue. That screenshot was reminiscent of Omicron Lyrae in Rebirth at first glance.mr.WHO wrote: ↑Fri, 28. Aug 20, 00:49You see both Torus wreck and Earth (all fine):
https://www.egosoft.com/news/images/new ... 25_214.png
No Descriptions is a good description - Egosoft 2018-2020
the music was awesomemr.WHO wrote: ↑Fri, 28. Aug 20, 00:32Trailer was so-so.
Too much time wasted on aqueduct showing the fog effect,plus the music was also so-so:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nRg5mA5OWc
The good:
0:33 - Terran asymetric fighter
0:40 - Terran destroyer (4 large turret spot and one S-landing pad - rather bog standard copy/paste of Split destroyer)
1:15 - Terran wide wing fighter (looks rather odd - the wings stand out too much for a space fighter and even have to fold before landing)
1:33 - Terran "covered" hangar (best thing in the trailer) and fold wing landing
Variable geometry is already in vanilla, but not user - Star Wars mod for X4 is using it already.
The Trailer reminded me of the X4:Foundation Announcement Trailer overall a few improvements namely gamestarts/scenarios and and the hull part example to indicate economy shortages are to be expected.
???Shehriazad wrote: ↑Fri, 28. Aug 20, 02:03While the new ships, station interiors and music they showed off in the trailer were nice...the trailer really fails at giving us some "drama"...it was really quite boring in terms of what is going on.
But while I don't look forward to Terrans since they are my least favorite faction...I'll be happy with a new pirate faction and the good stuff from patch 4.0...and maybe X4:Terran Confl....errrr Cradle of Humanity has some decent story.
P.S. Initial trailer reaction on the stream seemed to be pretty bad from anyone that didn't know X4 already. Neither the economy side nor the combat side of the game were shown off enough to give people some impression about its' strengths. Personally I think the trailers could need some more Khazaam (I dont even mean pew pew) to draw the interest of non-X veterans.
At this point do we have to assume the encyclopedia issue has to be around cost to translate a bunch of text well? I mean they spent all that time working on the encyclopedia ship comparison tool which is pretty damn cool. So its not like they aren't prioritizing the encyclopedia features.
A lot of X music is like that though. I assume its because its all very low key music meant to enhance the sandbox mood, and not drive the actual game play.
For me Tokyo was first thing that came to my mind, but cargo containers pushed me towards Mobile Minning Base Ship which is very similar to Tokyo. There is no visible large turret ports and only one Small landing pad.raUlo wrote: ↑Fri, 28. Aug 20, 08:44The more I examine the trailer, the more I doubt my initial thought that the Tokyo-shaped ship is actually a carrier. Its size compared to its engine indicates that it is no larger than the rest of the carriers in the game (except for the Raptor and Monitor). Also the blue cargo containers present on its hull might indicate that it's not a combat ship. Interestingly though, there are 8 L-sized turret slots on it