Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- XWiki Moderator
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sat, 30. Nov 13, 15:40
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
fantastic! hope for more FPS improvements till next official patch !!!
Terran atitude.
-
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Thu, 9. Jan 03, 19:47
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
any fsr 2? Any better aa methods like taa? Coming in 6?
Did they fix the poor performance on stations with alot of cap ships queued up to dock at it?
Did they fix the poor performance on stations with alot of cap ships queued up to dock at it?
-
- Posts: 5649
- Joined: Wed, 29. Jul 09, 00:46
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
I just did a test comparing performance between 5.1 and 6.0. It was done on a busy station of mine in Faulty Logic I. All vanilla, all DLC enabled. I have an 15-12600K with RTX3060Ti and 32 GB RAM (3600 MhZ)
5.1
FPS = 48
Save time = 10.3 seconds
Load time = 83 seconds
6.0 beta
FPS = 71 (47.9% improvement)
Save time = 7.7 seconds (33.8% improvement)
Load time = 40 seconds (107.5% improvement)
These results are MASSIVE! Big thanks Egosoft!
Also Boso looks kinda weird now. He commed me during my test. It will take some getting used to! Mostly his eyes look a bit too small. I feel like they should be bigger.
5.1
FPS = 48
Save time = 10.3 seconds
Load time = 83 seconds
6.0 beta
FPS = 71 (47.9% improvement)
Save time = 7.7 seconds (33.8% improvement)
Load time = 40 seconds (107.5% improvement)
These results are MASSIVE! Big thanks Egosoft!
Also Boso looks kinda weird now. He commed me during my test. It will take some getting used to! Mostly his eyes look a bit too small. I feel like they should be bigger.
-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Fri, 18. Nov 05, 00:41
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
First impressions my end after playing a few hours.
Position defence is nice - definitely means I may actually use a carrier now, very convenient.
Performance improvements, I'm not seeing a huge improvement like others are expressing, it feels like there is some improvement but im still seeing the same fps dips and drops.
Lighting improvements are obvious but seem to not be fully exploited yet - shadow improvements are big.
New collision engine - seems like ships getting stuck in things (player ship included) is going to be much much less common now - great change.
Cinematic camera is cool, will give us all something to do while waiting for things to happen - this is restricted to areas we have satellite coverage right?
Load times vastly improved.
Also, I spoke to Boso. New Boron model is really nice, very alien and awesome but as a consequence less relatable (thats fine in itself, but a little bit of damage control would be nice) - the vastly more 'realistic' look makes boso's voice suddenly seem off when talking to him though, especially face to face. This is a problem that was going to arise with the (great) push towards further realism and the more mature design - it reminds me of the disney-star-wars aliens speaking english vs original star wars aliens speaking their own language. The other races like paranid or split 'get away with it' because they have vaguely human-like mouth parts - you can imagine that its somewhat possible that they can make those voices, but not so much with boso, he feels very 'disconnected' from his voice. This isnt a complaint but a raising of a concern and hope for the future. The move towards more realistic aliens is great but it might be time to finally add some lore and events in-game to explain why we hear the aliens as we do. We need a 'bablefish' moment and lore in x5? (perhaps would be cool in the future if each race could get their own language-like sounds like in no mans sky superimposed under the voicing too). I do question why the decision was made to totally move away from eyes-on-stalks for them though. The lore of them moving their eye-stalks to convey emotion was very endearing, I miss that one feature. It always reminded me of dogs and their lowering and raising of their ears.
Position defence is nice - definitely means I may actually use a carrier now, very convenient.
Performance improvements, I'm not seeing a huge improvement like others are expressing, it feels like there is some improvement but im still seeing the same fps dips and drops.
Lighting improvements are obvious but seem to not be fully exploited yet - shadow improvements are big.
New collision engine - seems like ships getting stuck in things (player ship included) is going to be much much less common now - great change.
Cinematic camera is cool, will give us all something to do while waiting for things to happen - this is restricted to areas we have satellite coverage right?
Load times vastly improved.
Also, I spoke to Boso. New Boron model is really nice, very alien and awesome but as a consequence less relatable (thats fine in itself, but a little bit of damage control would be nice) - the vastly more 'realistic' look makes boso's voice suddenly seem off when talking to him though, especially face to face. This is a problem that was going to arise with the (great) push towards further realism and the more mature design - it reminds me of the disney-star-wars aliens speaking english vs original star wars aliens speaking their own language. The other races like paranid or split 'get away with it' because they have vaguely human-like mouth parts - you can imagine that its somewhat possible that they can make those voices, but not so much with boso, he feels very 'disconnected' from his voice. This isnt a complaint but a raising of a concern and hope for the future. The move towards more realistic aliens is great but it might be time to finally add some lore and events in-game to explain why we hear the aliens as we do. We need a 'bablefish' moment and lore in x5? (perhaps would be cool in the future if each race could get their own language-like sounds like in no mans sky superimposed under the voicing too). I do question why the decision was made to totally move away from eyes-on-stalks for them though. The lore of them moving their eye-stalks to convey emotion was very endearing, I miss that one feature. It always reminded me of dogs and their lowering and raising of their ears.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue, 15. Mar 22, 01:27
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
I am having a couple of issues with the physics engine. I did a fresh install and brand new save. Twice I have clipped through the elevators to the lower level when they go up. Also the Rapier that you're given at the start of the Segaris Pioneers can't dock with anything. The legs will deploy but the hit box must be messed up since you can't get close enough to the docking pad to dock. It's no problem if you have a captain as they can dock fine and you can dock fine if you have a docking computer.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue, 3. Jan 23, 22:03
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Amazing job Egosoft! I am loving the 6.00 Beta and it’s improvements.
A good start makes for an easy finish
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 3557
- Joined: Mon, 26. Mar 12, 14:57
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
The rapier issue was fixed today, will be in the next build of the beta.jovaras154 wrote: ↑Fri, 20. Jan 23, 06:09 I am having a couple of issues with the physics engine. I did a fresh install and brand new save. Twice I have clipped through the elevators to the lower level when they go up. Also the Rapier that you're given at the start of the Segaris Pioneers can't dock with anything. The legs will deploy but the hit box must be messed up since you can't get close enough to the docking pad to dock. It's no problem if you have a captain as they can dock fine and you can dock fine if you have a docking computer.
01001100 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 01110011 00101110 00101110 00101110
My art stuff
My art stuff
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 12150
- Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
This had happened in XBTF at the very start where the Teladi does a try&error adjustment to establish communication compatibility. If we start thinking more deeply about it then talking to someone immersed in water expecting them to emit sound waves is already a big problem and the rabbit hole just goes deeper. But you are correct cant hurt to have a deeper look at it. #Lorenerdsunite

MFG
Ketraar

-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 31726
- Joined: Fri, 16. Apr 04, 19:21
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
@ jovaras154 and all: As a general request though, please report new-to-beta problem issues in the public beta forum, and note the request there for useful information in support of your reports.
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
-
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: Mon, 10. Apr 06, 20:35
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
I can't see a 6.00 beta in steam, do I just have to wait?
It was a woman who drove me to drink... you know I never went back and thanked her.
Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal.
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 54155
- Joined: Tue, 29. Apr 03, 00:56
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Read the information linked in the very first post in this thread. The first one explains the rules of the public beta; the second one explains how to access it.
Gregory wrote: ↑Thu, 19. Jan 23, 18:04 How do I take part in the Public Beta?
Every player who owns X4: Foundations has the opportunity to download the new 6.00 beta version. In order to ensure that beta participants are aware of the risks and rules involved, we ask all interested players to visit our forum, where they will find the rules and disclaimers, as well as practical instructions for participating in the beta. Follow this link to our forum (no registration required) to find the relevant information.
-
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
I'm not at home to test myself, but what exactly does the "bombardment" assignment do?
Does it affect target selection (e.g. "only attack stations and capital ships")?
Does it affect range to target (e.g. "only stay at maximum weapon range and retreat if target gets too close")?
Does it affect weapon selection (e.g. "only use weapons with longest range" or "only use strongest weapon" or "only use torpedoes")?
Does it affect target selection (e.g. "only attack stations and capital ships")?
Does it affect range to target (e.g. "only stay at maximum weapon range and retreat if target gets too close")?
Does it affect weapon selection (e.g. "only use weapons with longest range" or "only use strongest weapon" or "only use torpedoes")?
-
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Thu, 9. Jan 03, 19:47
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
The gfx look nicer, the lighting and reflections look good, shadows much improved tho on stations i wish the distance the hq shadows would be longer but its got longer since last version so its a improvment. Fps not as good tho imo with my 3570k. Must just be those that afford more expensive cpus.
-
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: Thu, 31. Aug 17, 17:34
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
This is an amazing list of changes for the game, huge kudos to Egosoft. If the 'transform gizmo' mentioned for the station editor is what I think it is, I'm very excited to try out the new version.
I didn't see it on the changelist so I'm hoping during the beta you could look at the bug where station module position/orientation isn't properly converted for savegames in some cases. The original report seems to have been deleted or made private (at least I can't access it) but it was assigned a ticket number back then.
I didn't see it on the changelist so I'm hoping during the beta you could look at the bug where station module position/orientation isn't properly converted for savegames in some cases. The original report seems to have been deleted or made private (at least I can't access it) but it was assigned a ticket number back then.
-
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Thu, 12. Oct 06, 17:19
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Question - will NPC faction use "position defence" logic for their carrier fleets?
Like that one poor carrier in Argon Prime or some of Terran dozen carrier fleets
Like that one poor carrier in Argon Prime or some of Terran dozen carrier fleets

-
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
There are so many changes I can't even choose a favorite one. Thanks for the hard work that went into this upgrade and massive game changer.
If you want to go fast, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
Operating System:
Windows 11 Pro 64-bit CPU: 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KF RAM: 32606 MBytes MBO: Gigabyte Z790 UD AC (U3E1) GPU: ZOTAC GEFORCE RTX 4080 Trinity OC NVIDIA 16 GB GDDR6 SSD: AJP600M2TB 1907 GB
If you want to go far, go together.
Operating System:
Windows 11 Pro 64-bit CPU: 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KF RAM: 32606 MBytes MBO: Gigabyte Z790 UD AC (U3E1) GPU: ZOTAC GEFORCE RTX 4080 Trinity OC NVIDIA 16 GB GDDR6 SSD: AJP600M2TB 1907 GB
-
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Thu, 12. Oct 06, 17:19
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Most nice feeling is that just beta 1, so we will still possibly get more goodies with later betas 

-
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Thu, 9. Jan 03, 19:47
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
The new teleporter room sections is nice, im glad about that change. 

-
- Posts: 3030
- Joined: Fri, 18. Nov 05, 00:41
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
Now that you mention it I remember seeing this on a stream of xbtf, but I never played it. Interesting! And yes indeed, a can of worms would be opened but I think soon might be the time to dig deep. I think it would lead to much more fleshed out aliens and a more immersive universe as a whole to do so.Ketraar wrote: ↑Fri, 20. Jan 23, 11:00This had happened in XBTF at the very start where the Teladi does a try&error adjustment to establish communication compatibility. If we start thinking more deeply about it then talking to someone immersed in water expecting them to emit sound waves is already a big problem and the rabbit hole just goes deeper. But you are correct cant hurt to have a deeper look at it. #Lorenerdsunite
MFG
Ketraar
-
- EGOSOFT
- Posts: 54155
- Joined: Tue, 29. Apr 03, 00:56
Re: Introducing X TECH 5 and kicking off 6.00 Public Beta
I can still see this report, and as far as I can tell nothing has changed. The report remains open, however, which means it is still on someone's radar.adeine wrote: ↑Fri, 20. Jan 23, 15:13 I didn't see it on the changelist so I'm hoping during the beta you could look at the bug where station module position/orientation isn't properly converted for savegames in some cases. The original report seems to have been deleted or made private (at least I can't access it) but it was assigned a ticket number back then.
One comment about your report, regarding the yaw value being dropped: that is actually perfectly normal. It can happen for any of the attributes whenever they match their specific default value, and it just means that the missing value will be assumed to take that same default value when it's read back in. The absence of a yaw attribute isn't, therefore, a sign of a problem in and of itself.