EnglishGermanFrenchRussianItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
Would an in-game option to disable stardust be desirable for X4?
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

Is an in-game option to disable stardust desirable?
Yes, I'd like it.
29%
 29%  [ 27 ]
No, I'm fine with using a mod for it.
24%
 24%  [ 23 ]
No, I don't want it.
12%
 12%  [ 12 ]
I don't care.
33%
 33%  [ 31 ]
Total Votes : 93

Author Message
radcapricorn





Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 385 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 03:09    Post subject: Would an in-game option to disable stardust be desirable for X4? Reply with quote Print

Seeing as my previous thread went into "oh you can just mod this" mode, and following up on Tamina's suggestion, I'd rather make a simple poll.

For clarity: "stardust" is the tiny particles you see when flying, which serve no other purpose than to give visual hints of your velocity (i.e. direction and speed).

Add your votes, and, if you like, justifications, but please, keep it to the topic. We all know how powerful and awesome modding in X series is already.

This is just a feature request, there's absolutely no guarantees that such option would end up in X4 regardless of this poll's results, but at least it'll help gauge whether or not I'm a lone loon wishing for impossible. I'm setting up the poll to run for 30 days. Hopefully it'll help gather enough data from the community for devs and critics to judge.

My personal vote and justification: yes, I want such an option, as I find this dust an annoyance, it's nature dubious. I can tell where I'm going just fine without it, and would prefer less clutter on an already quite busy screen. I suppose it'd also be beneficial for screenshot glory threads and video recording, be it demos, "let's plays", contests, showcases, etc.
I'd rather it be a built-in option, so that I wouldn't need to learn, ask or otherwise find out how, what and where to change, especially considering that previous games already had all the required functionality, besides option itself, built in.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mr.WHO





Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Posts: 2823 on topic
Location: Wroclaw - Poland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 13:46    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Why not - more option is better than less option and I don't thing it would cost Egosoft much of precious development time.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan Phipps
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 17963 on topic
Location: Stonehenge, UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 14:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I don't mind seeing the particles. I do sometimes find them quite useful when they show that in fact I'm creeping at low speed (especially in reverse) when I had intended to remain stationary, and also to show when I'm strafing successfully. That's my personal opinion but neither would I mind them being an in-game option.


_________________
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ezarkal





Joined: 22 Apr 2015

Location: Somewhere in my head

PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 14:25    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

While I find it could be reduced in some way, my opinion is pretty much the same as Alan: I don't find it to be a bother, and it's useful to keep track of less conventional movements and maneuvers.


_________________
"I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...
I'm saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem solve itself out."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tamina





Joined: 26 Jan 2014



PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 14:43    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I don't mind but would like to try it at least once.
A toogle or a slider to reduce the effect would be awesome.

That said I am fine using a mod.


_________________
Code:
  /l、
゙(゚、 。 7
 l、゙ ~ヽ   /
 じしf_, )ノ
This is Tamina. Copy Tamina to your signature to help her achieve world domination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Falcrack





Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 1131 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 15:17    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I always turn it off in space games when it is an option.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GCU Grey Area



MEDALMEDAL

Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 4267 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 19:35    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Not something I'd be interested in, so unless it's an utterly trivial thing to add (i.e. would only take a couple of minutes or so) I'd prefer the devs to focus on more important stuff.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
euclid
Moderator (Script&Mod)
Moderator (Script&Mod)



Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 9490 on topic
Location: Gower, South Wales
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 18, 22:23    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

GCU Grey Area wrote:
Not something I'd be interested in, so unless it's an utterly trivial thing to add (i.e. would only take a couple of minutes or so) I'd prefer the devs to focus on more important stuff.

Second that.

Cheers Euclid


_________________
"In any special doctrine of nature there can be only as much proper science as there is mathematics therein.”
- Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), Metaphysical Foundations of the Science of Nature, 4:470, 1786
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
linolafett
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT



Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 2018 on topic
Location: EGOSOFT HQ
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 11. Jun 18, 17:29    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

By the way, this is the "proper" way of doing a poll.
No leading question and neutral answers covering the probable responses.


_________________
01101001 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101111 01101011 01101001 01100101 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001

My art stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
A5PECT





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 4628 on topic
Location: NJ, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 06:16    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I don't care.

I tried out a stardust removal mod back in X3R and it didn't have any effect on my experience.


_________________
Admitting you have a problem is the first step in figuring out how to make it worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ubuntufreakdragon



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 23 Jun 2011
Posts: 3960 on topic
Location: Das Randland des Wahnsinns!
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 12:35    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

The old always present stardust ist defined in one .xml for a modder changing such things takes 5min.

If Devs add a game option we have a lua ui some .xml 's and may be even hardcode involved, modding this carnage takes months creating it takes many hours and can interfere with other things creating nasty bugs.

logic result: I DON'T WANT SUCH AN OPTION, I RATHER MOD IT MYSELF.
but I want a custommenu like in X3 that works without lua edits but just xml changes.
we don't need much here just a list of:
buttons
sliders
spaces
headings
some mouseover helptext


_________________
My X3 Mods

XRebirth, things left to patch:
In General; On Firing NPC's; In De Vries; Out Of Zone; And the Antiwishlist
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
radcapricorn





Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 385 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 14:53    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

ubuntufreakdragon, so the logic is you don't want an in-game option that removes a need for a mod... because it will be difficult to mod that option?.. What for? I don't even...

This is exactly why the old thread was restarted as a poll. You modding wizards tend to overcomplicate things. Especially those that do not exist yet Wink

It's been going well so far, kudos to linolafett for that observation. Hopefully we'll keep on track still.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan Phipps
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 17963 on topic
Location: Stonehenge, UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 15:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Just for clarity and to prevent the thread being derailed into a modding/modders discussion, what ubuntufreakdragon is saying (in my opinion) is that an aspect of the game that is rather trivial to mod (for an experienced modder) could yet require substantial work for the devs to implement properly as an in-game option - and that extra option could even trigger other unforeseen in-game side-effects with say the UI.


_________________
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ubuntufreakdragon



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 23 Jun 2011
Posts: 3960 on topic
Location: Das Randland des Wahnsinns!
Thank you for registering your game
modified
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 15:43    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

And don't forget about Nebulas and such things simmilar to stardust, if you make stardust complicated simmilar things tend to become complicated, too.
And if I want to mod in some nice green nebula with small dust clouds touching the ship, or I want to remove exactly these nebula clouds, I would have much more work with such an option.


_________________
My X3 Mods

XRebirth, things left to patch:
In General; On Firing NPC's; In De Vries; Out Of Zone; And the Antiwishlist


Last edited by ubuntufreakdragon on Wed, 13. Jun 18, 00:41; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Honved





Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Posts: 1190 on topic
Location: PA, USA, Terra, Sol System
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 12. Jun 18, 17:04    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I couldn't care less about the "dust" particles, but PLEASE don't include the dense "fog" that pervaded about a third of the sectors in X3:TC. It simply makes no sense to have "fog" in large sections of space, and if there is a local anomaly that holds that much dust in some kind of "orbit" around a gravitational object, it should be problematic for the ship in other respects: like sandpaper grinding down the hull surface.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Fri, 21. Sep 18, 06:54

All times are GMT + 2 Hours

[ Disclaimer / Impressum ] | [ Privacy Policy / Datenschutz ]

Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2018
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.15139 seconds, sql queries = 31