EnglishGermanFrenchRussianItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
DLC, will Egosoft return to the dark days of Rebirth?
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic

DLC, do you want it,yes, no or maybe?
Yes, I would love DLC
53%
 53%  [ 39 ]
NO, I hate DLC
17%
 17%  [ 13 ]
Maybe? The middleground seems nice
28%
 28%  [ 21 ]
Total Votes : 73

Author Message
spankahontis





Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 2093 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 2. Jun 18, 19:43    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

DLC needs to be a bare minimum.

Expansion sized content is okay, but a new system, a new voice pack etc., fluff like this needs to be rejected. Don't go nuts like Paradox and Creative Assembly with over 100 pounds worth of content that most should be in the game in the first place, you'll lose respect that way.


_________________
There is no.. WaaaHH!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nemesis1982





Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 632 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 4. Jun 18, 19:23    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Not voted because the answer is not there. I do not mind DLC as long as the original game is done and it adds something worth the extra amount.

Egosoft has a stallar track record when it comes to DLC:
- updates are free
- DLC packs actually add something and are priced fairly

I wouldn't even mind if they add a plot for the borons and the borons in a DLC pack and charge for it, nor the teladi. However if the game will go live with little content it would be a nice gesture to provide a small DLC as included with the game. As they did with XR.

If they're full blown expansions I do not even mind paying close to full price. Say X3 to X3R to X3TC


_________________
Save game editor an CAT/DAT Extractor
Keep in mind that it's still a work in progress although it's taking shape nicely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Assailer





Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 377 on topic
Location: Findland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 5. Jun 18, 20:31    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Instead DLC nonsense, just take extra 6-12 months and release a complete game - like in the old days.


_________________
Rebirth Mods:
Missionary
CSI: Compilation
Fly-by Subscribe
Fly-by InfoScan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
linolafett
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT



Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 1960 on topic
Location: EGOSOFT HQ
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 5. Jun 18, 21:14    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Assailer wrote:
Instead DLC nonsense, just take extra 6-12 months and release a complete game - like in the old days.


And then get bad feedback for "selling two games which should have been one".
See Left4Dead and Left4Dead 2.
Too short relaease cycles are and were not appreciated by many.


_________________
01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01010100 01010110 01000011 01000100 01110011 00100000 01100110 01100001 01110101 01101100 01110100 00100001

My art stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Warnoise





Joined: 08 Mar 2016



PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 06:45    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

As long as the devs don't go full paradox on us bombarding us with dozens of worthless DLC's then I am ok. Adding new race, new ships, new systems as DLC would be fine imo

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blotunga





Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 51 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 07:58    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

DLCs just make me wait longer for the "Complete" version of any game. I have nothing against them, except that I avoid most games until I'm fairly sure no more DLCs are coming.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 142 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 15:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

blotunga wrote:
DLCs just make me wait longer for the "Complete" version of any game. I have nothing against them, except that I avoid most games until I'm fairly sure no more DLCs are coming.


Did you wait for Albion Prelude before getting Terran Conflict?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spankahontis





Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 2093 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 15:13    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

blotunga wrote:
DLCs just make me wait longer for the "Complete" version of any game. I have nothing against them, except that I avoid most games until I'm fairly sure no more DLCs are coming.



It's what put me off buying XCom 2, I bought the First XCOM, then they released a complete edition with the DLC I missed, Operation Slingshot and the one with the Psyonic women Ava (Until they added that DLC with Enemy Within).

It's also left me more cautious of games, Prefer the Game, a £25-30 Expansion a year later and just keep those coming. The way it used to be.


_________________
There is no.. WaaaHH!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketraar
Moderator (PortuguÍs)
Moderator (PortuguÍs)

MEDALMEDAL

Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 8530 on topic
Location: Guimar„es (Portugal)
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 16:23    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Warnoise wrote:
As long as the devs don't go full paradox on us bombarding us with dozens of worthless DLC's then I am ok. Adding new race, new ships, new systems as DLC would be fine imo

I will be one of those that will "defend" the Paradox model and would full support Ego for the same move, adjusted to the X reality.

EU4 is from 2013 and still today I play BECAUSE they change stuff around and add new features. Along with any paid DLC is lots of free stuff in patches. I find it a pretty balanced aproach for long term polishing and evolving of big games. Obviously this model does not agree with many games and does not mean its the right move for all of them. But Long lived games that benefit from extended polish and tweaking, have this way a good avenue for funding by breaking it up over time.

That you can pick and choose which DLC to buy at what time is also not to be discarded. Pizza aint free Wink

MFG

Ketraar

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Honved





Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Posts: 1139 on topic
Location: PA, USA, Terra, Sol System
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 17:05    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Being able to pick and choose is good in theory, but makes it difficult to mod the game extensively when you don't know what DLCs the individual player may be using or not using. It's not too bad when there's a year or two between versions, but when you have new DLCs out every few months, it's like shooting at a moving target.


The major redesigns of the program (X to X2 to X3 to X4) involve engine and major graphics/animation changes. The minor revisions (X3 to X3:R to X3:TC to X3:AP) add moderate amounts of content and new plots. Anything less than that belongs in the "patch" category, not DLC, or else is non-essential to the game, such as music, graphical improvements like exhaust trails or higher resolution textures, or external utilities (station design calculator, etc.).

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 142 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 6. Jun 18, 17:33    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

People use the term DLC for a lot of different things. Some DLC is no different from what use to be called "Expansions" or "add-on" in the past. Other is a lot closer to "micro-trans" type of small content. And there is a lot of space in-between these two.

So, when someone says, "No DLC"... they are basically saying no gimmicky micro-transactions... and also no Expansions. And that's fine. I like additional content being developed post-launch. (I also know a bit about how game development cycles work, and understand that it is often preferable to have just some staff work on the "Next Big Thing"... and need to find work for the remaining staff until NBT is ready for more work).

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blotunga





Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 51 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 7. Jun 18, 14:14    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

sd_jasper wrote:
blotunga wrote:
DLCs just make me wait longer for the "Complete" version of any game. I have nothing against them, except that I avoid most games until I'm fairly sure no more DLCs are coming.


Did you wait for Albion Prelude before getting Terran Conflict?

As a matter of fact I didn't. But that's just because Egosoft didn't used to have DLCs. And also I almost regret not waiting and install a mod to include the TC plot into AP. All those hours building the HUB are in TC, while in AP I have a different save with different things.

Ketraar wrote:
Warnoise wrote:
As long as the devs don't go full paradox on us bombarding us with dozens of worthless DLC's then I am ok. Adding new race, new ships, new systems as DLC would be fine imo

I will be one of those that will "defend" the Paradox model and would full support Ego for the same move, adjusted to the X reality.

EU4 is from 2013 and still today I play BECAUSE they change stuff around and add new features. Along with any paid DLC is lots of free stuff in patches. I find it a pretty balanced aproach for long term polishing and evolving of big games. Obviously this model does not agree with many games and does not mean its the right move for all of them. But Long lived games that benefit from extended polish and tweaking, have this way a good avenue for funding by breaking it up over time.

That you can pick and choose which DLC to buy at what time is also not to be discarded. Pizza aint free Wink

MFG

Ketraar


So you're ok with paying 300 euros for the complete version of your game? I have bought Crusader Kings 2 years ago, but haven't bought any DLC after they started the flood.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 142 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 7. Jun 18, 16:53    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

blotunga, the problem is that you can't know the future, so how can you ever buy any game? Postal 2 had a DLC pack come out 11 years after the game!

I think you just have to ask yourself if the base game is worth the price and if you can deal with either not buying the DLC or spending more to get post launch content.

To be honest, there are a lot of games that I don't buy the DLC for as I think they are overpriced for too little content. And I really don't like "season passes" (worse than pre-orders). When a game launches with a "season pass" option, I often find myself thinking that I'll just wait for the "Game of the Year Edition" to come out with the bundled DLC.

But there are plenty of games that I know will have DLC, but I still (1) trust the developer to create a "complete" game with just what ships at launch, and (2) find that game to be worth the asking price. Sometimes I get the post-launch DLC, sometimes I don't. But I'm not going to not buy a game that I want and will enjoy just because they will (or might) create DLC in the future.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketraar
Moderator (PortuguÍs)
Moderator (PortuguÍs)

MEDALMEDAL

Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 8530 on topic
Location: Guimar„es (Portugal)
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 7. Jun 18, 19:39    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

blotunga wrote:
So you're ok with paying 300 euros for the complete version of your game? I have bought Crusader Kings 2 years ago, but haven't bought any DLC after they started the flood.

I'm pretty sure I made an in-depth explanation of my point, condensing it to an arbitrary number is silly on your part and show little interest in a real discussion.

Also what constitutes a "complete" game? Who defines this? You, the internet, GoD? Rolling Eyes

I buy games that interest me, some I'm willing to pay full price, some I only get when on sale, and anything in between. In the Case of EU4 you can get the game with most DLC on sale often for around 20 bucks. Yes many of us that bought the DLC that came up have potentially paid more, but without that there would not be any games to buy with all that content. Or you would have 4-5 separate games. If we count that 5 years worth of FIFA or CoD its going to be 300 bucks for the base game too no?

Games cost money to make, or pizza as we know. A movie ticket costs from 7-15 Ä for a 2h hour experience, why is 10 for 20h+ content not similarly worth it? As jasper said, its up to people to define what is worth for them and what not, making blanket statements is so 2016.

MFG

Ketraar

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wellmadman





Joined: 18 Nov 2012



PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 18, 09:21    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

TO be fair I love playing as boron and I will probally wait until at least the boron DLC is release, by that point I will have seen if they hit the mark or missed it like a comet missed the earth millions of years ago.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Thu, 21. Jun 18, 18:03

All times are GMT + 2 Hours

[ Disclaimer / Impressum ] | [ Privacy Policy / Datenschutz ]

Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2018
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.11935 seconds, sql queries = 31