EnglishGermanFrenchRussianItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
Jumpdrives got me into X3, highways just dropped me off XR, and we're legion
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 14, 15, 16 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Santi
Moderator (DevNet)
Moderator (DevNet)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 3319 on topic
Location: UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 30. May 18, 16:52    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Space Highways are not an issue if you can use other methods to speed up your travelling times. With boosters, SETA, and autopilot, you can totally ignore highways if you want to do so. I am holding my thoughts in Teleportation till I know more about it.

This is one of the few cases where Egosoft has gone the extra mile and make how you travel around the Universe "an option".

You are happy with highways, you can use them, your are not, then do not use them as they are one of many options, it is a player choice.


_________________
A por ellos que son pocos y cobardes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Honved





Joined: 20 Jun 2010
Posts: 1190 on topic
Location: PA, USA, Terra, Sol System
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 30. May 18, 17:15    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I see the addition of "express travel lanes" in each direction as a potentially positive way of aiding navigation across large sectors. The ships should be able to gradually accelerate to higher "travel" speeds outside of the lanes as well, but the lanes would allow for automatic navigation and safer "hands free" operation than trying to cut directly across a sector to a remote destination. The inclusion of enclosed structures in space, as "tubes" that you have to fly through, was just silly. PLEASE, no tubes.

All it takes is either one simple string of markers between the lanes for each direction (green on the side you're heading, red on the opposite side, and everyone tries to stay well away from the oncoming traffic and the markers), or else well-spaced accelerator rings that you fly through to boost your speed in that direction, NOT a restrictive and insanely resource-intensive system of enclosed tubes. Think of how many stations they could have built for what was sunk into those "highways" in XR.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 154 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 30. May 18, 17:39    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Honved wrote:
I see the addition of "express travel lanes" in each direction as a potentially positive way of aiding navigation across large sectors. The ships should be able to gradually accelerate to higher "travel" speeds outside of the lanes as well, but the lanes would allow for automatic navigation and safer "hands free" operation than trying to cut directly across a sector to a remote destination. The inclusion of enclosed structures in space, as "tubes" that you have to fly through, was just silly. PLEASE, no tubes.


In X Rebirth (and presumably in X4) local highways are not enclosed. The "tube" is just a visual effect to show where the highway is and what direction it goes. Ships can enter and exit at any point along the local highway.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Graaf



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 3668 on topic
Location: Riding that SQUASH-mine.
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 30. May 18, 21:51    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Santi wrote:
Space Highways are not an issue if you can use other methods to speed up your travelling times. With boosters, SETA, and autopilot, you can totally ignore highways if you want to do so. I am holding my thoughts in Teleportation till I know more about it.

This is one of the few cases where Egosoft has gone the extra mile and make how you travel around the Universe "an option".

You are happy with highways, you can use them, your are not, then do not use them as they are one of many options, it is a player choice.

Well, since optionality is back, why not give us the option to use, or in your case, to not use, the jumpdrive?


_________________
Trade, Fight, Build, Think. There is no Walk.

FAQ.
Acronyms
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 154 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 30. May 18, 22:15    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Graaf wrote:
Well, since optionality is back, why not give us the option to use, or in your case, to not use, the jumpdrive?


Think about this for a minute. What happens in a game where factions can destroy enemy stations... and have the ability to move a whole fleet to the enemy's stronghold?

You get carnage. Just a total slug fest to see who can wipe the other as quickly as possible. Build up then roll the enemy (and hope they don't get bigger faster).

Now think about wha it means to not have that ability. The faction has to slowly expand out toward their enemy. They have to maintain supply lines, engage on multiple fronts, battle for borderland areas, protect their flank, and so on. This is a deeply more strategic game, all by just removing the Jump Drive.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fleabum





Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 76 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 00:57    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

sd_jasper wrote:
Now think about wha it means to not have that ability. The faction has to slowly expand out toward their enemy. They have to maintain supply lines, engage on multiple fronts, battle for borderland areas, protect their flank, and so on. This is a deeply more strategic game, all by just removing the Jump Drive.


X3 LU had jumpdrives and the OCV still expanded sector by sector protecting their supply lines. It's all in the coding

Regards
Flea

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 154 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 01:46    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Fleabum wrote:
X3 LU had jumpdrives and the OCV still expanded sector by sector protecting their supply lines. It's all in the coding


Well I can't speak to LU, as I've never played it, but what is the point of supply lines when you can just instantly teleport supplies from where they are to where they need to be?

Unless it is just forced to act that way because Jump Drive, used logically, would be less strategic and less fun? That's all fine... you can make a game that way. All in the coding as you say. I just don't really go for that kinda of "ignore the man behind the curtain" design.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Graaf



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 3668 on topic
Location: Riding that SQUASH-mine.
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 07:42    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

sd_jasper wrote:
Graaf wrote:
Well, since optionality is back, why not give us the option to use, or in your case, to not use, the jumpdrive?


Think about this for a minute. What happens in a game where factions can destroy enemy stations... and have the ability to move a whole fleet to the enemy's stronghold?

You get carnage. Just a total slug fest to see who can wipe the other as quickly as possible. Build up then roll the enemy (and hope they don't get bigger faster).

Now think about wha it means to not have that ability. The faction has to slowly expand out toward their enemy. They have to maintain supply lines, engage on multiple fronts, battle for borderland areas, protect their flank, and so on. This is a deeply more strategic game, all by just removing the Jump Drive.

And all those deep strategies go into the bin when you place your fleets inside your friends territory before you make a surprise assault.

And then we still get carnage and a slug fest to see who can wipe out the other first. No matter what tactic you use. What else did you think would happen?

And what kind of supplies are we dependant of? Reinforcements? Always. Jumpfuel? Ahum... we need a jumpdrive for that. Other? Please enlighten me.


sd_jasper wrote:
...engage on multiple fronts...

Only if you can support that, otherwise I advice you NOT to open multiple fronts.


_________________
Trade, Fight, Build, Think. There is no Walk.

FAQ.
Acronyms
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Santi
Moderator (DevNet)
Moderator (DevNet)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 3319 on topic
Location: UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 13:04    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Graaf wrote:
Well, since optionality is back, why not give us the option to use, or in your case, to not use, the jumpdrive?


That already had a response from the devs, jumpdrive will be substituted by teleporting, how that will pan out, we will not know till the game is out.


_________________
A por ellos que son pocos y cobardes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Assailer





Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 379 on topic
Location: Findland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 17:25    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

My main concern with static highways is that they pretty much define how sectors are designed optimal. If they would implement dynamic highway system where the highways get built based on traffic.... then just by looking at the zone map you would know where the real business/traffic is Smile


_________________
Rebirth Mods:
Missionary
CSI: Compilation
Fly-by Subscribe
Fly-by InfoScan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Graaf



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 3668 on topic
Location: Riding that SQUASH-mine.
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 18, 19:06    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Santi wrote:
That already had a response from the devs, jumpdrive will be substituted by teleporting, how that will pan out, we will not know till the game is out.

My guess is: poorly.
And another guess: after a few times using it, people will start complaining about the extra action to take over the ship.


_________________
Trade, Fight, Build, Think. There is no Walk.

FAQ.
Acronyms
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sd_jasper





Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 154 on topic
Location: MD, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 1. Jun 18, 02:46    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Graaf wrote:
And all those deep strategies go into the bin when you place your fleets inside your friends territory before you make a surprise assault


Not at all. Move your fleet deep into a target territory then attack, well you may win... but what about all the ships and stations between your friendly areas and where your fleet is now? You have to deal with them on the way back out... Or have a secondary fleet that moves in to help secure the areas between.

Or were you assuming that NPCs would park big fleets in one central area? If you can't just instantly move a fleet anywhere, it makes a lot more sense to have multiple smaller fleets and patrol your controlled areas.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Assailer





Joined: 25 May 2014
Posts: 379 on topic
Location: Findland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 1. Jun 18, 06:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Besides the initial highway system, the player should be able to build those. Then highways should have some maintenance fee and tariff for providing faster, safer travel. This could be a business opportunity, like highway mogul Smile


_________________
Rebirth Mods:
Missionary
CSI: Compilation
Fly-by Subscribe
Fly-by InfoScan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Falcrack





Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 1131 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 1. Jun 18, 14:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Santi wrote:
Space Highways are not an issue if you can use other methods to speed up your travelling times. With boosters, SETA, and autopilot, you can totally ignore highways if you want to do so. I am holding my thoughts in Teleportation till I know more about it.

This is one of the few cases where Egosoft has gone the extra mile and make how you travel around the Universe "an option".

You are happy with highways, you can use them, your are not, then do not use them as they are one of many options, it is a player choice.


There has to be an advantage to using highways over other forms of travel. Otherwise, there will be no reason to have them in the game at all.

Perhaps highways could have the advantage of being much faster than boosting for going between two points. Or it would use less fuel than boosting (maybe boosting would require e-cells). Boosting would have the advantage of versatility in terms of where you want to go.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sparky Sparkycorp
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)



Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 7000 on topic
Location: UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 1. Jun 18, 15:37    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Falcrack wrote:

There has to be an advantage to using highways over other forms of travel. Otherwise, there will be no reason to have them in the game at all.

Perhaps highways could have the advantage of being much faster than boosting for going between two points. Or it would use less fuel than boosting (maybe boosting would require e-cells). Boosting would have the advantage of versatility in terms of where you want to go.

I'm sure this will be the case (A-to-B faster by highway, but with players probably wanting to go from A-to-C via B) since this is the Rebirth approach (with, I believe, adjustments in X4 to be more HoL DLC-like and having less windy highways).


_________________
X:R mod list. X:R Wiki.
Updated TC/AP Bonus Pack. AP TS efficiency.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 14, 15, 16 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Fri, 21. Sep 18, 06:39

All times are GMT + 2 Hours

[ Disclaimer / Impressum ] | [ Privacy Policy / Datenschutz ]

Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2018
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.20859 seconds, sql queries = 29