EnglishGermanFrenchRussianItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
Fighter vs M2
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 14:56    Post subject: Fighter vs M2 Reply with quote Print

What is the best fighter squadron to take out a well shielded lone Terran M2 with energy weapons while evading flaks and ppc?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RAVEN.myst





Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Posts: 2572 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 15:23    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Personally, I really wouldn't recommend fighters to take on M2s, especially Terran ones - you'll suffer ruinous attrition even with a large enough squadron to successfully finish the job. However, potential options for taking on such large targets, if you're masochistic enough to try (that's not a criticism or insult: I'm a big fan of using groups of smaller ships to take on larger ones), include:

- Falcon Hauler or Falcon Sentinel with EBCs - relatively sustained damage with strong shields (200MJ and 400MJ, respectively); downside is their low speed for fighters.
- Terraformer M3s (I forget which hexadecimal code is their "name") fitted with PMAMLs. The matter anti-matter warheads do very good damage, especially in numbers. However, the downsides are heavy: the ship's shielding is very thin (50MJ), and their speed can be so high that it causes them to crash into the target and each other (this can be mitigated by not upgrading their speed as much - experimentation required - you definitely don't want them to have their max speed of 450+m/s, as their turning is too slow, and they kamikaze into their target, yet you want them fast enough to get into attack range as quickly as possible, and to present harder targets.) Also, you will need ample warhead ammo...

Another, also ammo-intensive approach is to use your fighters as missile delivery platforms. You'll need TONS of missiles, though you may forgo arming them with weapons, as you want them to focus on missile fire. Any fighter that can field Tornado missiles will do well, BUT: sourcing sufficient said missiles may be difficult (I think you'll need to build a complex to churn these out), and I suspect only some fighters are compatible - likely the pricier ones.

Whatever approach you take (the above is not an exhaustive list), you will need large numbers, and expect heavy casualties.

Happy hunting! Smile


_________________
-
Boron passenger: "You must hurry - my testicles are drying out!"
-
Born on Lave, raised on Freeport 7...
-
The Write Stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan Phipps
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 17540 on topic
Location: Stonehenge, UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 16:06    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

You can help the attacking fighters by launching waves of swarm missiles and fighter drones from ships held further away to distract the target's defences. The missiles and drones you expend will probably be cheaper than the fighters you might otherwise lose.


_________________
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 16:21    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Is it possible to bring down shields of a M2 destroyer in quick strike using Ion disruptors from fighters and then dock the ships for safety.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan Phipps
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 17540 on topic
Location: Stonehenge, UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 16:28    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

One problem is that IonDs 'bounce' from target to target so if you have a swarm of fighters using them on the same target, you will be stripping your other fighters' shields as well as the target's.


_________________
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RAVEN.myst





Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Posts: 2572 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 16:47    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

pasmon wrote:
Is it possible to bring down shields of a M2 destroyer in quick strike using Ion disruptors from fighters and then dock the ships for safety.

One possible way to do this is to use fighters equipped with Pulsed Beam Emitters - these are as good at stripping shields, with the added bonus that, due to their rate of fire, once the shields have been removed, hull hits have a fairly good chance of taking out installed systems, which can include guns, shields, and ship equipment. PBEs have a short range, though, so you may experience increased "kamikaze".


_________________
-
Boron passenger: "You must hurry - my testicles are drying out!"
-
Born on Lave, raised on Freeport 7...
-
The Write Stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fireanddream



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 13 Dec 2015
Posts: 247 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 17:07    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Not really worth it in vanilla since every time you hear FLAK/SSC fire off one or more of your pilots die a miserable death.

Like others said PBG is a weapon too good for fighters. The chance of TK-ing is also minimized because of capital ships' sizes. Mass driver is another fun weapon to use on Solano swarms, never tried it but I anticipate a kill under 1 min with 60 solanos equipped with mass drivers. Will probably lose 15 in the process, and the logistics tho.

The ultimate squadron are drones. Try dropping 2000 of them over an Osaka.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sirrobert





Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 1112 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 1. Jan 18, 17:30    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Thanks to the auto-pillock, fighters tend to crash into large ships when they are attacking.
Without that problem though, fighter clouds utterly destroy large ships.

And for that, Litcube has made Bounce


_________________
9 out of 10 voices in my head say I'm crazy. The 10th is singing the music from Tetris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Thu, 4. Jan 18, 23:39    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

What is the best loadout for a group of eclipse targeting an M8, M7 or M7C including antifighter missile protection?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Triaxx2





Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 7143 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 00:54    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Buster Raiders with Mass Drivers. A dozen should be more than enough. Unless it's AP, then two dozen.


_________________
A Pirate's Revenge Completed Now in PDF by _Zap_
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016

The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed

Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 06:45    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

What are the best anti-missile lasers loadout for ai fighters?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fireanddream



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 13 Dec 2015
Posts: 247 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 11:04    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

There's none. Firing PSG manually is the only answer to missile barrages.

Fighters have no way to handle flail, none.

MDM is particularly susceptible to missiles with a blast radius; the destruction of one hammer torpedo can take out other mosquitoes around it but leave its fellow torpedoes unharmed. So even M7Ms won't be able to rely on MDM to defend themselves.

It's a bit frustrating to jump out your entire fleet once an M8 show up at the other end of the map. But hey, that's vanilla for you.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 17:22    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

How about mosquito missile defence and PRGs?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fireanddream



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 13 Dec 2015
Posts: 247 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 18:18    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

pasmon wrote:
How about mosquito missile defence and PRGs?


I commented on MDM (mosquito defense system) in my original reply. It works moderately well if you fire them manually, but it will require your full attention and some will still go through. Fast weapons like PRGs work great in TC where missiles have like 1 hp, weapons like PBE ensure that no missile can reach you in TC, but can't really defend you against heavier missiles in AP.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pasmon





Joined: 17 May 2010



PostPosted: Fri, 12. Jan 18, 21:26    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I observed that a Panther(with IBLS, ISR and flaks) and with a squad of eclipse(4-6) can take out another lone M7(Terran or Xenon) protected by a small group of fighters more easily as compared to tiger.

In theory, a destroyer with a wing of fighters should easily dispatch another lone destroyer. Like Split M2+ or a Boreas guarded with panther or Demios.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Thu, 26. Apr 18, 17:35

All times are GMT + 2 Hours


Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2018
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.08816 seconds, sql queries = 29