EnglishGermanFrenchRussianPolishItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
[Rebirth] Are there single-seat style fighters (non-player)
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Sam97531





Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 206 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 12, 16:03    Post subject: [Rebirth] Are there single-seat style fighters (non-player) Reply with quote Print

I know I know, we have an ugly M6 millenium falcon uber ship. But does the game actually still have, that M3-M5 class of ship in general? Regardless of whether a player can fly them or not.

Obviously this is of interest to me so that I can dream about mods, expansions, etc...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squirrelrider





Joined: 12 Feb 2012



PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 12, 16:09    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

They'll surely be there. It's not like all the universe will be populated with albion skunks. That would utterly and literally stink.


_________________
I'm naturally unfriendly sometimes. Don't take what I say too badly.
Surprised Shocked Sad Crying or Very sad Mad Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Headbang D'oh Skull Spamming smileys till X rebirth comes out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hektos





Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 395 on topic
Location: South Carolina, USA
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 12, 18:05    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

squirrelrider wrote:
They'll surely be there. It's not like all the universe will be populated with albion skunks. That would utterly and literally stink.

I see what you did there Razz Very Happy(extra smiley just for you)

But yeah, there will still definitely be all sizes and shapes of ships. Not that it's been officially confirmed, but common sense would agree here that it would be extremely silly for them not to have it that way.


_________________
Intel i5 2500k Quad Core @ 4.0ghz (air cooled)
Gigabyte GTX 670 OC
Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
8GB GSkill Ripjaw Ram
1TB Western Digital Caviar Black HDD
750w PC Power and Cooling Silencer PSU
Windows 7 64-bit

All bundled in a nice roomy Antec 1200
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Privata





Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 121 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 12, 20:46    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

allso you can see some M3 M4 looking ships in the trailer , and the X rebirth art wallpaper , there are fighters that look like there got a cockpit the seize of a argon


_________________
Been a big Xfan sins BTF , just could never find the time to create a account
X3 Albion harder and more aggressive enemies
http://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=315062
X3 (all games) X2 nebulas in X3
http://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=312417
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aragosnat



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Posts: 778 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Thu, 31. May 12, 21:32    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I think in one of the stickies or Bernd posted some where that there will be fighter sized ships just the classification we used in X3 and such will not be there. But, yeah. IT would be silly not to have such as I'm sure there are plenty of eople out there who like flying in one and or cannot afford a corvette to fly around in.


_________________
Chain Maille Armor
Profitzz
May this spacefly bother you.

TC: 32+ Squidie (Steam DiD) deaths and counting since around June 18, 2012.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Huillam





Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 128 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Fri, 8. Jun 12, 22:36    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Drones (remotely controled) may replace m3/4/5 ships.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Freya Nocturne



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 1154 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 12, 10:25    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Huillam wrote:
Drones (remotely controled) may replace m3/4/5 ships.

So the IRL near future, Makes sence I suppose, but I like my fighters... call me olde school.
(is a seasoned and famous badass ace in World of Warplanes, people fear my name, fighter combat is in my blood)


_________________
Leaving Egosoft for friendlier sites.
(You all know who you are)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ConCorDian



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 15 Jun 2011
Posts: 1521 on topic
Location: Kilmarnock, Scotland
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sat, 9. Jun 12, 12:03    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Bernd did say that there would still be pretty much all the types of ships we are used to, just im assuming they will be classified differently, so some sort of fighters yes, big destroyers, yes, frigates, yes... just we wont be able to directly fly them... but im on the assumption we can command them to do things. our fighting will be done via the VR suite on the Skunk taking control of drones, which im actually really starting to warm upto the idea.

think about it, we are now starting to use UAV's just now, and they are even taking up limited combat roles, 1000's of years down the line youd imagine we would have remote controlled vessels totally licked, allowing us to use them as effectivly as piloting it yourself, meaning you could do the damage with less risk... it makes sense, and i think it might make for a decent DiD style game!!! (if they can knock all the connection and game glitches out aswell)


_________________
find me on Steam
check out Roguey's Wiki - still under development
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Coreblimey





Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 1165 on topic
Location: Sat in front of my monitor, silly! (North Shields UK)
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 12, 10:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Huillam wrote:
Drones (remotely controled) may replace m3/4/5 ships.



Now I haven't read a lot about XR because I like surprises (but hopefully not shocks!) so that when/if the game is released I can enjoy discovering how to actually play the game.
The way I interpret things is that drones are not replacing m3/4/5 ships. The drones are m3/4/5 or larger ships. It's just that they are pilot-less. When you control these drones via VR it would be as if you are in the cockpit yourself, but your not. So if the drone is destroyed you live on without ejecting. All you do then is put another coin in the slot, send out another drone and 'pilot' it, ad infinitum, or at least until the last drone is destroyed.

And please, nobody spoil my dreams! Pretty please! Very Happy


_________________
If it doesn't work, give it a kick. If that doesn't fix it hit it with a hammer. If it still doesn't work, USE A BIGGER HAMMER!!!

Unknown Sector..... That's what you get for using Bing instead of Google!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dougeye





Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 1718 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 12, 11:00    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

m3/m4/m5 or as they will now be known as "drones" will be pilotable and controlled using a virtual interface with the drone, this will appear to be exactly the same perspective as the player has when playing a vanilla version of x3, the difference being they will be expendable as the player wont die if the drone is taken out. There will be just as many ships to control if not more but in the game word you are essentially taking on the role of another pilot rather than transporting to the ship. The only exeptions will be capital ships which you will no longer be able to manouver yourself with a contoller, these will require orders to be given to the ships captain.


_________________
ANTEC 1200 V3 - (Modified with gentle typhoon fans) - INTEL i7 2700k 4.7ghz (OC) - ROG Maximus 4 Extreme MOBO - 2x NVIDIA GTX 580 SLI - 16gb Corsair Vengeance 1600mhz ddr3 ram - 120 gb OCZ Vertex 3 SATA 3 6gb (speed) SSD - 600gb WD Velociraptor HDD - Corsair 1000w PSU - ALC Vantage CPU liquid cooler (modified with gentle typhoon fans) + 2gb storage and super fast silent optical drives - BEAST!!!!! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coreblimey





Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 1165 on topic
Location: Sat in front of my monitor, silly! (North Shields UK)
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 12, 12:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Dougeye wrote:
The only exeptions will be capital ships which you will no longer be able to manouver yourself with a contoller, these will require orders to be given to the ships captain.


Well my dreams haven't been spoiled. Perhaps a tiny little dent put in them. But i'm still Very Happy .

By orders do you mean "Okay. Left hand up a bit, pull back on the throttle. Steady as you go." or "Get over there now! And when I say 'now' I mean 5 minutes ago you scurvy ridden land-lubber!" type of order?


_________________
If it doesn't work, give it a kick. If that doesn't fix it hit it with a hammer. If it still doesn't work, USE A BIGGER HAMMER!!!

Unknown Sector..... That's what you get for using Bing instead of Google!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dougeye





Joined: 07 Mar 2009
Posts: 1718 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 12, 12:53    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

i expect it will be text/vocal dialogue commands to issue specific orders like "attack this target" for example but i am also hoping for a strategy style UI were you can give more detailed orders to you fleet like in a real time strategy map view on the fly.


_________________
ANTEC 1200 V3 - (Modified with gentle typhoon fans) - INTEL i7 2700k 4.7ghz (OC) - ROG Maximus 4 Extreme MOBO - 2x NVIDIA GTX 580 SLI - 16gb Corsair Vengeance 1600mhz ddr3 ram - 120 gb OCZ Vertex 3 SATA 3 6gb (speed) SSD - 600gb WD Velociraptor HDD - Corsair 1000w PSU - ALC Vantage CPU liquid cooler (modified with gentle typhoon fans) + 2gb storage and super fast silent optical drives - BEAST!!!!! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coreblimey





Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 1165 on topic
Location: Sat in front of my monitor, silly! (North Shields UK)
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Sun, 10. Jun 12, 13:25    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

dougeye wrote:
i expect it will be text/vocal dialogue commands to issue specific orders like "attack this target" for example but i am also hoping for a strategy style UI were you can give more detailed orders to you fleet like in a real time strategy map view on the fly.


Oh dear! There goes another dent in my dreams! I was never very good at RTS type games. But never mind. I'm at the very least still Smile


_________________
If it doesn't work, give it a kick. If that doesn't fix it hit it with a hammer. If it still doesn't work, USE A BIGGER HAMMER!!!

Unknown Sector..... That's what you get for using Bing instead of Google!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sam97531





Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 206 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Jun 12, 15:54    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

ConCorDian wrote:

think about it, we are now starting to use UAV's just now, and they are even taking up limited combat roles, 1000's of years down the line youd imagine we would have remote controlled vessels totally licked, allowing us to use them as effectivly as piloting it yourself, meaning you could do the damage with less risk... it makes sense, and i think it might make for a decent DiD style game!!! (if they can knock all the connection and game glitches out aswell)


Please lets avoid this topic. It has been discussed to death, and much more so on the military forums ("trolled" by ex and current fighter pilots and craft crews).

The reason drones exist and are a viable solution is due to the lack of electronic warfare complexity posed by the most obvious enemy.

Assuming enemies of equal advanced complexity, free air signals are the last method you want to control any sort of military hardware. If you want to discuss complete self sufficient self encased AI shielded against external EW, then you may have a valid discussion. Remotely controlled "drones" are simply very effective against an inferior enemy - So unless X-rebirth is the equivalent of the US drone bombing Yemen and Afghanistan, reality should not play into this conversation at all.

Basically, the US fighting the US, would render each others drones completely ineffective should the need arise. However, as the US is not threatened by the US, the need does not arise and drones seem invincible.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ConCorDian



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 15 Jun 2011
Posts: 1521 on topic
Location: Kilmarnock, Scotland
Thank you for registering your game
modified
PostPosted: Wed, 13. Jun 12, 16:13    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

okay you start off by saying:

Quote:
Please lets avoid this topic. It has been discussed to death,

and then go on to write:

Quote:
The reason drones exist and are a viable solution is due to the lack of electronic warfare complexity posed by the most obvious enemy.

Assuming enemies of equal advanced complexity, free air signals are the last method you want to control any sort of military hardware. If you want to discuss complete self sufficient self encased AI shielded against external EW, then you may have a valid discussion. Remotely controlled "drones" are simply very effective against an inferior enemy - So unless X-rebirth is the equivalent of the US drone bombing Yemen and Afghanistan, reality should not play into this conversation at all.

Basically, the US fighting the US, would render each others drones completely ineffective should the need arise. However, as the US is not threatened by the US, the need does not arise and drones seem invincible


contradictory much?

a point for you (and you can take it to your military forums if you like), that is basing it solely on todays technology... this is how far in the future? technology changes, communications technology will change, and NOBODY and i mean NOBODY can say that the future communication technologies will be less, as, more secure than what they currently are... so all of your "ex and current fighter pilots and craft crews" are talking out of a hole that shouldn't speak shall we say if they are trying to comment on the future this way.... as a matter of fact i was at a lecture with 2 high level PHd's who were in a place to comment on this and for all they can not say for certain they said that point to point secure transmissions were making real leaps forward and that it is more likey than not that truly secure communications could occur....

why else would the UK, US, Chinese etc etc governments be investing as much money into UCAV technology if it was inherantly useless unless fighting against vastly inferior foes?

another point for you, THIS IS SCI FI!! yes we look at technology now and try to base it semi on realistic factors, but at the end of the day its fiction!! it doesn't matter.

therefore my point stands


_________________
find me on Steam
check out Roguey's Wiki - still under development


Last edited by ConCorDian on Wed, 13. Jun 12, 16:20; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Sat, 25. May 13, 12:15

All times are GMT + 2 Hours


Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2009
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.27141 seconds, sql queries = 75