EnglishGermanFrenchRussianItalianSpanish
Log inRegister
 
Valhalla?
Post new topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Bill Huntington



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 2480 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 27. Aug 18, 20:34    Post subject: Valhalla? Reply with quote Print

I'm just checking out the Valhalla. It's got 7 x 2 shields but it's so slow. It's so wide it can't even fly through a gate. It can carry ships inside its cavernous bays.

Have any pilots used it in direct combat? How does it rate?


_________________
Bill in S.F., enjoying the game
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alan Phipps
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)

MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 16 Apr 2004
Posts: 17957 on topic
Location: Stonehenge, UK
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 27. Aug 18, 21:48    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

An oldie but goodie thread.


_________________
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DrSuperEvil





Joined: 02 Mar 2018

Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon, 27. Aug 18, 23:50    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I never use it for general combat since the need for a Jump Beacon or an Aran to ferry it is very inconvenient and it has big blind spots.

I mostly use it as a base ship for UFJD exploration since you can use Kestrels to deploy a 4x4x4 grid of satellites to help find tunings to make it faster. The high shield regeneration make it a good mobile miner with docked TS ships using CLS to collect the minerals.

Combat wise it is best used as an M6/M8 carrier but with the lethargic construction time in the PHQ you are better off going for multiple Tyr, Woden and Kyoto ships. As far as frontal fire power goes the Tyr is on par while the additional SSCs on the top and bottom turrets are not that useful given how they are scattered over the large surface area of the ship. In general it takes a huge investment to make it fast enough to get to a battle before it is already over and the Aran does better as a heavy carrier. Again the production speed if the main disability compared to the 6x2GJ Tyr or the 7x2GJ Kyoto which is more mobile.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jlehtone



MEDALMEDALMEDAL

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 17064 on topic
Location: GalNet BBS
Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Mon, 27. Aug 18, 23:56    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

Alan, I don't even dare to guess how you can pull that stunt every single time. Cool


Google claims that I wrote last Oct:
Quote:
In other news:
A privately owned Valhalla was spotted on its maiden flight in Xenon 472. All witness telemetry confirms that the ship had only PSP's onboard and no escorts. The barge could barely hit 30m/s. As expected, Xenon fighters surrounded the toothless giant. Probably by mistake, the Captain of Valhalla did shout on open comm channel: "Ramming Speed!!".

Our rocket engineers are still clueless about what did terminate the Xenon fighters. Valhalla ramming anything should be physically impossible.

Personally I don't recall the event, but it cannot have been utterly bad. I must have had a beacon bearer, for Valhalla cannot enter any Xenon sector on its own.


... I have a faint memory of "dashing" between two ATF Valhallas. They never saw* it coming ...


I prefer Dragon and Python. How do I rate anything?


* "... nothing moves in Terran space without ..."


_________________
Goner Pancake Protector X
Insanity included at no extra charge.
There is no Box. I am the sand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sovereign01





Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1439 on topic

Thank you for registering your game
PostPosted: Tue, 28. Aug 18, 03:01    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I was fortunate enough to board two of those things while the Terrans were fighting the Argon, they're definitely Awesome But Impractical. Their slow speed means that while the rest of the fleet goes to engage, the Valhalla is left all too vulnerable. As long as you have a fast JD-equipped ship plus ecells (I used a Springblossom), that takes care of the problem of how to get away once you capture the thing! Very Happy


_________________
In The Threat, the Odysseus was the ship of choice.

In Terran Conflict, it was my Skirnirs that brought the destruction.

In AP, it was my fleet that greeted the Xenon!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JJRSC





Joined: 16 Dec 2013



PostPosted: Mon, 3. Sep 18, 03:48    Post subject: Reply with quote Print

I have occasionally cheated one in in TC and outfitted it just for kicks (no fighters though). The first time I "Cheat Jumped" (using the cheat command so it doesn't blow up at the gate) into Xenon Core 023. This was pretty late game, so the sector had several Js and Ks, about a dozen or so Qs (with more jumping in all the time) and loads of fighters... it would be a challenge even in a Boreas, so I figured this thing was so big and slow that it wouldn't last too long. So I just plunged in to see how long I could last, strafed and dodged the best I could - and the thing chewed up and spit out everything in the sector. It just ground through the entire sector and shields never dropped below 75%. I couldn't believe it. I could have gone and made a sandwich and the damn Valhalla still would have owned everything in the sector. I've tried it a few more times since then, with pretty much the same results.

Might be different in AP though, with the hull buffs and other changes. But that's my experience, FWIW.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
Control Panel
Login Data
The time now is Wed, 19. Sep 18, 00:54

All times are GMT + 2 Hours

[ Disclaimer / Impressum ] | [ Privacy Policy / Datenschutz ]

Board Security

Copyright © EGOSOFT 1989-2018
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Template created by Avatar & BurnIt!
Debug: page generation = 0.06729 seconds, sql queries = 20