Voice acting and dialogue

[Morkonan]

...Yep, you. Personally, I'm with the OP. Enough with the juvenile humor and comments. Most of us X players are grownups. The 'witty' comments would go over a lot better if they were few and far between, rather than a constant diet.

^-- This.

Context-ignoring NPC commentary is almost always a bad thing, since it pulls the player out of the reverie of their imagined experience.

Player is in a heated battle, half the bridge gets blown away, total decompression, emergency vacsuits activate, NPC walks onto the bridge from the lift and says "It smells like old underwear in here" and then they're blown into space... apparently unconcerned, now that they've successfully completed their "npctwitchspeak#random___" script....

Well, that would be funny as heck, but would likely tend to break the suspension of disbelief we all hunt for when playing an X game.

Constnat chatter in games can be a problem, too. I don't know how it is in Rebirth, but in some games, it's downright annoying when NPCs start dumping their twitch/idle/playernear jabber. What's the point if everyone's jabbering at once as soon as the player enters their zone?

Comm dialogue, though - That's probably a lot more important for immersion than crew or generic NPC chatter. The communications system relaying a conversation between a player and NPC is going to be very context specific with plenty of ques to call up some nice bits. "Greeting" dialogue can be nice, too, with various NPCs getting a reputation with the player solely from their initial dialogue. ie: "Oh, it's you, again. What do you want this time?" Instant "personality" that the player is going to respond to.

[adeine]

Get voice actors to read a thousand different versions of "Ouch", and play a random one every single time the autopilot crashes their ship into some object.

The meta kind of immersion.

[Karvat]

Please egosoft, please, give the NPCs many more dialogue options, such as identifying and signaling approaching enemy ships, such as "enemy xenon ship sighted 1 kilometer to the north". If I'm in charge of a big ship I really want a team capable of helping me in dangerous situations, like "shield energy under 50%", things like that, do not let everything do the computer on board, give greater importance to subordinates.

[radcapricorn]

Karvat, the "ship sighted" notification... have you ever played any of Silent Hunter? These types of reports are useless and annoying as hell, and in X I can imagine them turning into a Royal Boron Pain in the Plasma Vents, given the penchant of throwing swarms of enemies onto a single player ship.
Furthermore, it wouldn't really make much sense in modern X. It could have had some small value back in BtF, XT or X2, where spotting something was indeed a skill, nowadays with crazy sensor ranges and selection highlighting smeared all over the screen - not so much.

[Karvat]

It was just an example, however in that case it would be enough to put a disabling option for people who do not want it. I would like to see more interactions with the subordinates on board in general

[Slashman]

I guess none of you watched Firefly.

MFG

Ketraar

I didn't notice this before but you have horribly insulted one of the most awesome space shows tv has ever seen.

You really compared dialogue in XR to Firefly? Wow...

[Honved]

Player is in a heated battle, half the bridge gets blown away, total decompression, emergency vacsuits activate, NPC walks onto the bridge from the lift and says "It smells like old underwear in here" and then they're blown into space... apparently unconcerned, now that they've successfully completed their "npctwitchspeak#random___" script....

Well, that would be funny as heck, but would likely tend to break the suspension of disbelief we all hunt for when playing an X game.

Reminds me of Oblivion: You're in the midst of the epic final battle scene with the combined Empire and Guild forces taking on the demonic hordes of Merunes Dagon, and the intervention by a divine power has just driven Dagon himself back to Oblivion.....when a random civilian strolls up and begins "I saw a Mudcrab the other day." That's a prime example on multiple levels of how NOT to do dialog.

[Skeeter]

One thing that annoyed me is the lack of ambiet background chatter between npcs. Like say you g to the bar in rebirth, you see a table of say 4 npcs sitting there. 1. They arnt talkng to each other and 2. They arentt animated the just sit there gormless. If x4 has anything like a bar next time or for example ur on a capital ship bridge i want to hear npcs talking to each other and animated so it looks like there interacting with talk ass in walks up to someone and they talk about orders or ship status etc. It doesnt have to be constant but has to be there for realism imo, i wouldnt like it if its quiet and npcs not looking like there doing actual jobs. If they are there just as eye candy i would hate that thats all the effort and thought thats gone into it.

Same as taking over a ship, when u click on the pilot to take over i expect manners like the player character saying ok xxx i will take over for now and the npc says yes sir.

Its the little slice of life details that needs to be in a game like this.

[CBJ]

It's not a question of lack of thought. As I've mentioned before, the problem with "background chatter" in a game that people play for 100s of hours is repetitiveness. The sheer volume of content that would need to be produced for this to even begin to do it without it driving people mad would be prohibitively expensive to write, translate and record, and even then players would hear the same things annoyingly often.

I'm sure someone can dig up the last time I explained this, where I think I used the news articles from X2 as an example of why it doesn't, and can't, work the way people imagine it might. If you want evidence from another game then the whole "...and then I took an arrow to the knee" history should pretty much cover it.

[Santi]

This is like taking an arrow to the AI.

[Honved]

It's not a question of lack of thought. As I've mentioned before, the problem with "background chatter" in a game that people play for 100s of hours is repetitiveness.

Exactly. Writing dialog isn't difficult. Writing enough dialog not to seem mind-numbingly repetitive after 100+ hours of playing time is a lot more work, and enough for the 1000+ hour players is asking a lot. Adding triggers to tell the AI when to use what dialog takes even more time. Blocking dialog when it's clearly out of place takes additional time and an understanding of the player's progress and accomplishments to that point. The task quickly balloons from "trivial" into some ginormous amount of effort to make it even remotely believable.


Silence is often the best option.

[Ketraar]

I love how this was "solved" in KSP where you can enable a mod that just uses sampled voice from NASA missions. In that case its very fitting and tbh I cant go into KSP without it. So maybe something similar to Chatterer would be enough, it would be for me.
Also pre-emptively mentioning that it can be turned on and off on the fly, making the "make it optional" crowd happy.

MFG

Ketraar

[sd_jasper]

It's not a question of lack of thought. As I've mentioned before, the problem with "background chatter" in a game that people play for 100s of hours is repetitiveness.

Exactly. Writing dialog isn't difficult. Writing enough dialog not to seem mind-numbingly repetitive after 100+ hours of playing time is a lot more work, and enough for the 1000+ hour players is asking a lot. Adding triggers to tell the AI when to use what dialog takes even more time. Blocking dialog when it's clearly out of place takes additional time and an understanding of the player's progress and accomplishments to that point. The task quickly balloons from "trivial" into some ginormous amount of effort to make it even remotely believable.


Silence is often the best option.

Also, voice actors can be expensive. Not just in voice actors' pay, but in the whole process to create voiced lines. Good voice acting needs good writing, good editing, a good voice actor, a good director to give info and make sure the actor gives the appropriate reading, and a dozen other things. Then once it is recorded, it can't easily be changed w/o the need to bring back the actor, redo the voice (really need the director here to make sure they use the same tone and inflection to match other lines). And of course if you want to support multiple languages ... that takes more than just translation. You have to be on alert for turns of phrase that don't translate (this is why most companies call the it "localization" not "translation").

And all this takes so much time! This can greatly extend out development time and push budgets way up!

Personally, I really hope that speech synthesis continues to improve and become more natural sounding (sorry voice actors).

... I might be a bit opinionated on this, having worked on two MMOs that were "fully voiced" and having to deal with "post recording changes"....

[radcapricorn]

If you do it, do it right, or not at all. Unfortunately, nowadays people ignore this fundamental rule, and we get Oblivions, Skyrims, and X Rebirths. BtF to X3 universes all seem more alive and convincing precisely because they don't have these cardboard cutout grim mysterious strangers pre-programmed with silly monologues. You don't see all those people in previous games, you just know they're there. In XR, you do see them, and they're... dead husks.

[Honved]

Also, voice actors can be expensive. Not just in voice actors' pay, but in the whole process to create voiced lines. Good voice acting needs good writing, good editing, a good voice actor, a good director to give info and make sure the actor gives the appropriate reading, and a dozen other things.

That's why the voice actors need some kind of direction and a pre-written script with a few alternate phrases from the start, as well as a director who understands the story segment and what's required, rather than ending up with a line that only semi-fits for one reason or another, and got used only because it would cost too much to redo it. A few extra minutes up front while everyone and everything is there could save a major headache and expense down the road.

As I've said, the biggest issues in most voiced games seem to be where the voice actor apparently had no idea of what attitude or emphasis was required, how to pronounce a word, or some other writing/coaching issue, not that the acting itself was terrible. A really good voice actor can sometimes work around the issues or make it sound convincing even if they're guessing at the character's personality, but it doesn't take a top notch voice actor to speak a line for a character and situation that's clearly spelled out for them. Either you pay more for extra time and skills for writing and coaching, or else pay a voice actor who can make the best of a bad or unclear script. The latter approach won't help the lines that the better actor didn't voice.

[Veeshan]

Put me in the "campy is okay if not overdone" camp. I was more annoyed by the aggressively rude lines than the silly ones.

However, one thing that does bug a bit is the mispronunciation or improper cadence and tone, unrealistic nuance, etc. If you're having trouble finding native English speakers, I'm happy to do any lines for free, don't mind signing various agreements etc

[DaMuncha]

Show me your queers please!