I still get knocked out of them from time to timeGCU Grey Area wrote:There is no minigame these days. They got rid of the silly "tailgate other ships to go faster" thing years ago.Buzz2005 wrote:highways should not have any minigame at all
Highway gameplay improvement
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 7779
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
That's what you're calling a minigame? Really? Thought avoiding flying into other ships was just a basic game mechanic common to many space flight sims. Never considered it might be a minigame, any more than I thought "don't fly into the side of the station", or "dodge the asteroid" could be them. Nah, really not convinced - think it's more a case of labeling elements of a game which some people don't like as "minigame", purely as a derogative term.Geek wrote:Yeah, avoiding other ships to keep max speed is *still* a minigame.
And you even get a small chance to be thrown away too, as written above.
There is nothing in common between avoiding regular ships, that you can see from a distance at normal speed (not to mention radar), and the *artificial* spawns inside a high speed highway.GCU Grey Area wrote: That's what you're calling a minigame? Really? Thought avoiding flying into other ships was just a basic game mechanic common to many space flight sims.
So yeah it is a minigame, big time.
Right on commander !
Its quite sad really that all these repetitive mini games were added. The X series didn't need them, Egosofts games are that rich, exciting, awesome and full of wonder that they don't need to add boring time sinks, crappy minigames, and useless chat interactions. These are things that game studios do when their games have a lack of depth, and seriously you don't need to do this Egosoft... your actually better than this. Your products have depth that other game studios should be trying to emulate, not the other way round.
For me, the X3 player wasn't your typical player than plays a game for a week or two, then moves onto the newest eye candy AAA title, they are ones who come back, month after month to play. I still play X3 since it was released, there are only two other games I come back to play month on month.... Path of Exile and Modded Minecraft.
Well I digress, back to space lanes.
I really dislike the whole moving your ship to miss other ships in a constrained tube of light. Do we really believe that races that have mastered space flight, colonisation and exploration of the universe, would have a manual system to move around other objects in a constrained space lane? come on.... we mere humans are still stuck on this rock and we are going to have fully automated travel before we have mass spaceflight.
For me space lanes was a game design choice that was negatively received in XR (and looking at the feelings on the forums, either people hate them, dislike them, get frustrated by the mechanics, or just live with them. You can count on one hand the amount of people who have said that space lanes are fantastic... they are awesome... they are the best way to travel through space.). Either remove them or make them fully automatic already.
And if you do force us to use these really stupid space lanes in X4, then as a bare minimum make them fully automatic and built into any autopilot or docking type system. Manually moving is a total waste of time, boring and repetitive, that time could be better suited to managing your corporation empire.
I fear space lanes are there to stay, I just hope the engine can cope with mods that can remove them... if not, then XR2 it is.
Regards
Flea
For me, the X3 player wasn't your typical player than plays a game for a week or two, then moves onto the newest eye candy AAA title, they are ones who come back, month after month to play. I still play X3 since it was released, there are only two other games I come back to play month on month.... Path of Exile and Modded Minecraft.
Well I digress, back to space lanes.
I really dislike the whole moving your ship to miss other ships in a constrained tube of light. Do we really believe that races that have mastered space flight, colonisation and exploration of the universe, would have a manual system to move around other objects in a constrained space lane? come on.... we mere humans are still stuck on this rock and we are going to have fully automated travel before we have mass spaceflight.
For me space lanes was a game design choice that was negatively received in XR (and looking at the feelings on the forums, either people hate them, dislike them, get frustrated by the mechanics, or just live with them. You can count on one hand the amount of people who have said that space lanes are fantastic... they are awesome... they are the best way to travel through space.). Either remove them or make them fully automatic already.
And if you do force us to use these really stupid space lanes in X4, then as a bare minimum make them fully automatic and built into any autopilot or docking type system. Manually moving is a total waste of time, boring and repetitive, that time could be better suited to managing your corporation empire.
I fear space lanes are there to stay, I just hope the engine can cope with mods that can remove them... if not, then XR2 it is.
Regards
Flea
- LittleBird
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon, 19. Dec 11, 02:02
Mmhhh... do you mean space lanes in general or just the poor execution in X:Rebirth?Fleabum wrote: For me space lanes was a game design choice that was negatively received in XR (and looking at the feelings on the forums, either people hate them, dislike them, get frustrated by the mechanics, or just live with them.
Because that is the point. Are space lanes wrong by default? I do not think so.
Ich bin für die Einführung von Ironie- und Sarkasmustags.
Alle Klarheiten beseitigt!
Alle Klarheiten beseitigt!
Space lanes can work if designed and implemented 'well'. Although what you call 'well' is different for everyone, and if you asked 10 different people, then I am sure you would get 10 different answers.LittleBird wrote:Mmhhh... do you mean space lanes in general or just the poor execution in X:Rebirth?
Because that is the point. Are space lanes wrong by default? I do not think so.
Personally I don't want them, or feel like I am forced to use them (due to disadvantages if you don't) if they are implemented. But if they have to be there then they should never be manual, this is a space game and it just is a stupid idea that you would have manual space lane with all the advanced and automated technology available in the universe. Space lanes needs to be automatically tied into the autopilot. If it is quicker to use a space lane, the autopilot should work this out, should fly you to it, hitch a ride in it and exit it at the correct point, before continuing on your merry journey.
Just give me SETA and a JD and I don't ever need to use a space lane.
Common sense lore and joking aside, the whole space lane mini-game is not in keeping with a genre of game like the X series. Its like saying would you put time sink mini-games in Age of Empires, Total War or Civilisation, No. Games with a lot of depth don't need mini-games, and the X series are classed along these lines. You should be too busy managing your empire to play bumper cars, find the loot crate, or guess the mood of NPC123 to recruit them.
Some games just don't feel right with mini-games and and the X series is one of these games. X:Rebirth was more of an arcade style game with a bit of 4x bolted on, so yes, mini-game were justified. Whereas X3 was (and x4 should be) not an arcade game, its a 4x strategy game with a flight combat simulator bolted on.
Regards
Flea
-
- Posts: 7779
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
You do realise you can already use autopilot in the highways, right? Can even use boosters & SETA while the autopilot is active, so you can still go just as fast. Don't understand why you are so insistent that everyone who doesn't agree with you should have to give up manual control. Surely the current implementation is better: people who just want a fast journey can simply set the autopilot & turn on SETA, while those who prefer it still have the manual option available.Fleabum wrote:if they have to be there then they should never be manual
Manual control means you don't turn on autopilot, why would you be giving up the option to NOT turn on autopilot if it was an option to have an autopilot? that makes no sense at all. /facepalm It you want to fly manually, then do it, nothing would change if the autopilot had the ability to, maybe, actually, autopilot.GCU Grey Area wrote:Don't understand why you are so insistent that everyone who doesn't agree with you should have to give up manual control. Surely the current implementation is better: people who just want a fast journey can simply set the autopilot & turn on SETA, while those who prefer it still have the manual option available.
So also telling me that X4 will have the autopilot fly you to a lane, keep you in it and then takes you out before flying you to your final destination now...
Awesome, job sorted then. Autopilot on, SETA on, and you don't have to worry about space lanes kicking you out, or bumbing you.
Or is this not how it behaves now?
regards
Flea
-
- Posts: 7779
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
Yeah, pretty much. Occasionally you'll end up behind a slow mover, which automatically slows the player's ship rather than crashing out of the highway. However, even then there are still options - either briefly drop out of autopilot while overtaking, or a short burst of gunfire will persuade them to get out of the way (yes, you can still fire guns while autopilot is active).Fleabum wrote:So also telling me that X4 will have the autopilot fly you to a lane, keep you in it and then takes you out before flying you to your final destination now...
Awesome, job sorted then. Autopilot on, SETA on, and you don't have to worry about space lanes kicking you out, or bumbing you.
-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 30371
- Joined: Fri, 16. Apr 04, 19:21
-
- Posts: 7779
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
Similar incident was why I switched over to Tornado as my primary anti-capital missile. Same DPS & don't really need a guided missile when the enemy has the same target profile as the broad side of a barn. It can also be really quite inadvisable to launch a volley of Firestorms from a ship which can only barely outpace them (e.g. Dragon). Let's just say pulling up sharply at the end of one particular bombing run had some unanticipated consequences...Alan Phipps wrote:@ Flea: I now have this mental vision of you quickly overtaking your own torpedo in the highway and going 'Boom!'.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue, 29. Jan 08, 01:40
Maybe I would like to raid a hauler but wish to do it in an un-populated area, so I will stalk it until I am ready and safe from the law.LittleBird wrote:Why do you want to catch up inside the highway?lyubarskiy wrote: I don't agree with the same speed thing. You don't need to have a bumper cars scenario if traffic is moving at different speeds. You can have a soft dampening system where you automatically glide around slower traffic, or avoid it if you want. But I do want the ability to catch up to that freighter / pirate in the tunnel. Or slow down to jump out at a specific point or just assess the current situation of things outside, or even escort a slow moving freighter to destination.
If everything has the same speed it is just a matter of a few seconds after everyone leaves the highway. In fact the distance you had before the freighter entered is the same when he leaves.
So I like the same speed idea. It eliminates collisions and you can leave ship controls for fleet management etc.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue, 29. Jan 08, 01:40
Could be avoided with dampening system. Just automatically glide around ships as if magnets pushing each other apart.GCU Grey Area wrote:That's what you're calling a minigame? Really? Thought avoiding flying into other ships was just a basic game mechanic common to many space flight sims. Never considered it might be a minigame, any more than I thought "don't fly into the side of the station", or "dodge the asteroid" could be them. Nah, really not convinced - think it's more a case of labeling elements of a game which some people don't like as "minigame", purely as a derogative term.Geek wrote:Yeah, avoiding other ships to keep max speed is *still* a minigame.
And you even get a small chance to be thrown away too, as written above.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue, 29. Jan 08, 01:40
By your logic everything in the game is a minigame then. Your understanding of what a mini game is flawed.Buzz2005 wrote:since you have to watch the ship to get out when wanted and to avoid traffic to get max speed, yes its a mini game
Lockpicking in skyrim is a minigame. Original Highways with tail sniffing was a minigame. Travelling though space is not a mini game.
- LittleBird
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon, 19. Dec 11, 02:02
I think I can not follow you.lyubarskiy wrote:Maybe I would like to raid a hauler but wish to do it in an un-populated area, so I will stalk it until I am ready and safe from the law.LittleBird wrote:Why do you want to catch up inside the highway?lyubarskiy wrote: I don't agree with the same speed thing. You don't need to have a bumper cars scenario if traffic is moving at different speeds. You can have a soft dampening system where you automatically glide around slower traffic, or avoid it if you want. But I do want the ability to catch up to that freighter / pirate in the tunnel. Or slow down to jump out at a specific point or just assess the current situation of things outside, or even escort a slow moving freighter to destination.
If everything has the same speed it is just a matter of a few seconds after everyone leaves the highway. In fact the distance you had before the freighter entered is the same when he leaves.
So I like the same speed idea. It eliminates collisions and you can leave ship controls for fleet management etc.
Tailing him with the opportunity to catch up or within a constant range makes no difference in following it.
Ich bin für die Einführung von Ironie- und Sarkasmustags.
Alle Klarheiten beseitigt!
Alle Klarheiten beseitigt!
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue, 29. Jan 08, 01:40
Well lets say the ship is a lot further down the highway. My only way to attack it would be to catch up.LittleBird wrote:I think I can not follow you.lyubarskiy wrote:Maybe I would like to raid a hauler but wish to do it in an un-populated area, so I will stalk it until I am ready and safe from the law.LittleBird wrote:Why do you want to catch up inside the highway?lyubarskiy wrote: I don't agree with the same speed thing. You don't need to have a bumper cars scenario if traffic is moving at different speeds. You can have a soft dampening system where you automatically glide around slower traffic, or avoid it if you want. But I do want the ability to catch up to that freighter / pirate in the tunnel. Or slow down to jump out at a specific point or just assess the current situation of things outside, or even escort a slow moving freighter to destination.
If everything has the same speed it is just a matter of a few seconds after everyone leaves the highway. In fact the distance you had before the freighter entered is the same when he leaves.
So I like the same speed idea. It eliminates collisions and you can leave ship controls for fleet management etc.
Tailing him with the opportunity to catch up or within a constant range makes no difference in following it.