M3 as MissileShips
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
M3 as MissileShips
I have currently equipped my 6 eclipse wing in panther with 18 Tornado missiles installed and when i launch them on a Q, only one of them fire missile and only when close in(probability of the entire wing is 35%).
How can i command them all to launch at the once in a line and then call them back as any missile blast in their vicinity will vaporize my m3 too.
How can i command them all to launch at the once in a line and then call them back as any missile blast in their vicinity will vaporize my m3 too.
-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 30368
- Joined: Fri, 16. Apr 04, 19:21
Each vanilla combat round (the length of which varies between IS, OOS observed, and OOS not observed), the attacking ship rolls the RNG against its missile probability to see if it EITHER uses a gun salvo (if in line of sight and gun range when IS) OR launches just one missile (just one warhead if OOS - not a swarm or sequence of missile warheads). Usually each AI ship only has one missile in flight at any one time - unless it is a barrage specialist.
If you want lots of longer range fighter missile launches in vanilla you need to be IS with your fighters and those set to a very high or 100% missile probability - or you call them bombers and ungroup their guns (or remove them to make room for more missiles) except for their anti-missile turrets.
In practice, I find most effective using a mixed fleet of slower fighter-bombers (with very high missile chance), some with high impact non-AOE missiles and others with swarmers as decoys. The rest of the attack fleet being fast attack fighters with no missile chance but optimised for doing IS gun damage such as using low energy or ammo-based weapons to allow for long salvos.
Setting up in advance the various fighter/bomber groups with leaders and followers and each individual ship with the appropriate correct orders and settings is key to a well-coordinated attack - but that is a subject unto itself. You also should expect, and have a pre-determined method for dealing with, likely fighter/bomber losses.
I find the fun in setting up and playing out the carrier fleet battle and whilst I certainly do not expect a lossless 'I win' on most occasions, I do try to learn from the scenarios that go badly.
Pro tip: missiles and fighter drones launched by the carrier can be useful during fleet fighter engagements too, both as additional attacks and as decoys.
If you want lots of longer range fighter missile launches in vanilla you need to be IS with your fighters and those set to a very high or 100% missile probability - or you call them bombers and ungroup their guns (or remove them to make room for more missiles) except for their anti-missile turrets.
In practice, I find most effective using a mixed fleet of slower fighter-bombers (with very high missile chance), some with high impact non-AOE missiles and others with swarmers as decoys. The rest of the attack fleet being fast attack fighters with no missile chance but optimised for doing IS gun damage such as using low energy or ammo-based weapons to allow for long salvos.
Setting up in advance the various fighter/bomber groups with leaders and followers and each individual ship with the appropriate correct orders and settings is key to a well-coordinated attack - but that is a subject unto itself. You also should expect, and have a pre-determined method for dealing with, likely fighter/bomber losses.
I find the fun in setting up and playing out the carrier fleet battle and whilst I certainly do not expect a lossless 'I win' on most occasions, I do try to learn from the scenarios that go badly.
Pro tip: missiles and fighter drones launched by the carrier can be useful during fleet fighter engagements too, both as additional attacks and as decoys.
A dog has a master; a cat has domestic staff.
I was IS with my MCM launching 6 eclipses with 100% probability of missile launches as a wing command. Only one of them launched. Other launched when dogfighting with "Q" and got vaporized as the result.If you want lots of longer range fighter missile launches in vanilla you need to be IS with your fighters and those set to a very high or 100% missile probability - or you call them bombers and ungroup their guns (or remove them to make room for more missiles) except for their anti-missile turrets.
If they have other options, the AI will randomly select the best option and missiles aren't always. Also Tornadoes are dumbfire, which means they travel in a straight line and the AI don't like to use them.
A Pirate's Revenge Completed Now in PDF by _Zap_
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
AI truly prefers tracking missiles over non-tracking one. This makes fighters ineffective against capital ships as their flaks will quickly eliminate any swarm before their missile damage buildup. Tornadoes are suitable with personal ship only.If they have other options, the AI will randomly select the best option and missiles aren't always. Also Tornadoes are dumbfire, which means they travel in a straight line and the AI don't like to use them.
Tempests are always my choice, but I also tend not to deploy M3's versus capitals. If you really want fighter sized anti-capital punch, you want to bring along an M8 bomber with Tomahawks, and issue the barrage order manually.
A Pirate's Revenge Completed Now in PDF by _Zap_
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri, 2. Mar 18, 12:13
The point of FAA is as an anti fighter weapon. If you want to use the missiles set it to 100% always.
Tornado Missiles do good damage for the price but are not homing so have trouble hitting anything smaller than an M1/M2 or a station in sector. OOS do not rely on missiles and do not expect anything with under 400k shielding to survive a single round of combat.
In sector rather use Thunderbolt missile payloads and use the full range to the advantage since non player ships tend to wait until a missile hits/expires before launching the next.
I personally never engage Qs with fighters unless they are already considered writeoffs/spammable from the PHQ.
Tornado Missiles do good damage for the price but are not homing so have trouble hitting anything smaller than an M1/M2 or a station in sector. OOS do not rely on missiles and do not expect anything with under 400k shielding to survive a single round of combat.
In sector rather use Thunderbolt missile payloads and use the full range to the advantage since non player ships tend to wait until a missile hits/expires before launching the next.
I personally never engage Qs with fighters unless they are already considered writeoffs/spammable from the PHQ.
-
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Wed, 24. Aug 05, 23:03
I have a related question so will post it here rather than opening a new thread...
What are the most powerful and effective missiles to equip a small fighter wing for IS combat? (Basically I've got 9 Aamon aboard my Griffon, and am looking to make them as potent as possible against both other fighters and capitals).
What are the most powerful and effective missiles to equip a small fighter wing for IS combat? (Basically I've got 9 Aamon aboard my Griffon, and am looking to make them as potent as possible against both other fighters and capitals).
Blub?
There must be a missile barrage command for the entire wing to launch a specific missile with minimum cool down from a specified distance and for balance, AI should also be allowed to do the same.In sector rather use Thunderbolt missile payloads and use the full range to the advantage since non player ships tend to wait until a missile hits/expires before launching the next.
-
- Moderator (English)
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri, 2. Mar 18, 12:13
Against fighters? slap in swarm missiles. Against capship?Nope. Kinda remember the thunderbolt was damaging assuming the fighter wing doesn't get shredded first before launching missiles. Can't remember explicitly the missile names since i haven't booted X3 for quite some time.Le Boron Chétif wrote:I have a related question so will post it here rather than opening a new thread...
What are the most powerful and effective missiles to equip a small fighter wing for IS combat? (Basically I've got 9 Aamon aboard my Griffon, and am looking to make them as potent as possible against both other fighters and capitals).
Not really true. All the Bonus Pack scripts started out as player-made ones and were adopted by Egosoft. Another example is the Universal Trader script 'Trade Command Mark III'. This started out in X2 as a player script and was subsequently incorporated into every X3 game.pasmon wrote:Individual Scripts destroy the overall balance and hence fun of game. Only the original developers know how to manage both of them together.Go to S&M. Scripters have surely done something like that.
What? Do you think the developers can think of, and do, everything in a game, especially small developers like Egosoft? They depend on the player base to help add functionality to the game, either by suggestions or by scripts and mods. It's up to each individual player to decide what's fun for them. To make a blanket statement that scripts "destroy the overall balance and hence fun of game" is silly.
Have a great idea for the current or a future game? You can post it in the [L3+] Ideas forum.
X4 is a journey, not a destination. Have fun on your travels.
X4 is a journey, not a destination. Have fun on your travels.
Well, well, well ...pasmon wrote:Individual Scripts destroy the overall balance and hence fun of game.
You did state:
To me that looks like you would consider the game more fun, if such "individual" wing missile barrage script would be added to the game. Why should it matter, who adds the script, if it does what you want?pasmon wrote:There must be a missile barrage command for the entire wing to launch a specific missile with minimum cool down from a specified distance and for balance, AI should also be allowed to do the same.
But then you did claim that additional scripts added by player destroy fun. The vanilla game does not have such script, so vanilla must be more fun than a missile barrage from fighters? You, as a player, cannot possibly know what is fun for you, but the devs do?
X3 Reunion did not have M8, M7M, or wings. No missile barrage of any sort. Good balance, yes?
A player wrote a "hotkey script" that did add "Group launch missile at my target." Must be bad?
Egosoft did include that script into X3R Bonuspack, making it "vanilla". How someone else's blessing could suddenly change the (lack of) fun and balance that you perceive in a script?
Some of the "individual scripters and modders" of earlier games have become "devs" of the later games. How did they manage to shift from destroying balance into knowing how to set it right?
Sorry, but I believe that these games should be played in every way that the players want to play them.
Goner Pancake Protector X
Insanity included at no extra charge.
There is no Box. I am the sand.
Insanity included at no extra charge.
There is no Box. I am the sand.
So if i introduce a comprehensive mod implementing aesthetic changes, it will be finally accepted by the devs to be a part of game? Why did not Codea get accepted? It was a great idea as i read.Some of the "individual scripters and modders" of earlier games have become "devs" of the later games. How did they manage to shift from destroying balance into knowing how to set it right?
Codea is available for those that want it. However, it does raise the difficulty level, and so most likely was not considered a good candidate for inclusion. Most Bonus Pack scripts add some kind of functionality to the game without making it more difficult. Here's another example - boarding. That originally came into being as a player-made mod for X3 Reunion. The functionality was added to subsequent games, but the mechanics were vastly different. For that matter, ideas from Codea were probably added to Rebirth, too.
One of the best aspects of player-made mods and scripts is it allows players to test out new ideas for the game, which may get included in the next game in one form or another (or even as a Bonus script for the current one).
So I'm really not comprehending where you get the idea that "Individual Scripts destroy the overall balance and hence fun of game."
One of the best aspects of player-made mods and scripts is it allows players to test out new ideas for the game, which may get included in the next game in one form or another (or even as a Bonus script for the current one).
So I'm really not comprehending where you get the idea that "Individual Scripts destroy the overall balance and hence fun of game."
Have a great idea for the current or a future game? You can post it in the [L3+] Ideas forum.
X4 is a journey, not a destination. Have fun on your travels.
X4 is a journey, not a destination. Have fun on your travels.
I would say the complexity level rather than the difficulty level myself. (Seriously it's a pain to get it to stand up and behave itself.)
Think of Scripts and Mods as condiments. You first take a bite of the meal. And then you adjust it to your personal tastes. You don't want scripts to change the balance, I like moving the balance. That's fantastic. I love a game that lets me do that. Individual balance of the game is a totally personal taste.
Think of Scripts and Mods as condiments. You first take a bite of the meal. And then you adjust it to your personal tastes. You don't want scripts to change the balance, I like moving the balance. That's fantastic. I love a game that lets me do that. Individual balance of the game is a totally personal taste.
A Pirate's Revenge Completed Now in PDF by _Zap_
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
APR Book 2: Best Served Cold Updated 8/5/2016
The Tale of Ea't s'Quid Completed
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain