Star Wars - The Last Jedi (may contain spoilers)

Anything not relating to the X-Universe games (general tech talk, other games...) belongs here. Please read the rules before posting.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

User avatar
Antilogic
Posts: 7526
Joined: Wed, 6. Apr 05, 20:33
x3tc

Post by Antilogic » Tue, 2. Jan 18, 19:43

Also Erik Bauersfeld, Ackbar's voice actor died in 2016. They may not have wanted to do much without him.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter. The event that did happen, the attack on the bridge was hugely important and helped cement how much trouble the resistance was in.

User avatar
ezra-r
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri, 14. Oct 05, 21:04
x4

Post by ezra-r » Tue, 2. Jan 18, 20:52

I got surprised that
Spoiler
Show
such a powerful and evil character as Snoke was killed so suddenly and without giving us more from him, his origins, how he became so powerful, etc
also in other movies
Spoiler
Show
getting to be a jedi was a lifetime work but Rey manages to control it so quickly
what do you think?

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11843
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Post by Ketraar » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 00:13

Not sure why the spoiler tags, it sais spoiler warning in the title.

So about Snoke, who cares? From the movies do you know where Darth Sidius became this strong, did you know why Vader was this strong. NO, then you got the prequels explaining everything and that went so well... (I dont hate the prequels, they are just mediocre, with the exception of the making Vader scene, that one was epic)

The Story is about Rey and Kylo, every other character is secondary, Snoke served its purpose in the path to "make" Kylo and it served that purpose. As I said before, 30 speculating and reading all sorts of "what ifs" will result in inevitable disappointment as no movie will be exactly how "fans" made them up, but the problem is, they are not the makers of it.

Its a thing these days, where "fans" feel they are entitled to have a say in the creative process of others, I find it both interesting and equally infuriating.

MFG

Ketraar

Skism
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon, 22. Mar 10, 21:36
x3tc

Post by Skism » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 18:29

Ketraar wrote:Not sure why the spoiler tags, it sais spoiler warning in the title.

So about Snoke, who cares? From the movies do you know where Darth Sidius became this strong, did you know why Vader was this strong. NO, then you got the prequels explaining everything and that went so well... (I dont hate the prequels, they are just mediocre, with the exception of the making Vader scene, that one was epic)

The Story is about Rey and Kylo, every other character is secondary, Snoke served its purpose in the path to "make" Kylo and it served that purpose. As I said before, 30 speculating and reading all sorts of "what ifs" will result in inevitable disappointment as no movie will be exactly how "fans" made them up, but the problem is, they are not the makers of it.

Its a thing these days, where "fans" feel they are entitled to have a say in the creative process of others, I find it both interesting and equally infuriating.

MFG

Ketraar
So the new narrative is that the fans of Star Wars are to blame for bad publicity nay should have no say in the direction of Star Wars?

Yeah I don't see that going down well. At all in fact.
So about Snoke, who cares? From the movies do you know where Darth Sidius became this strong, did you know why Vader was this strong. NO, then you got the prequels explaining everything and that went so well... (I dont hate the prequels, they are just mediocre, with the exception of the making Vader scene, that one was epic)
Earlier point you made:

Cinematography, score, character arcs and actor performances, action set pieces and the plot overall.
They are a joke Ketraar

The Characters in this movie are an utter joke there is no 'character arc'

Rey is the definition of a Mary Sue

Multiple people died without explanation.

The plot was an utter joke.

There was no Science In this Science Fiction in fact the physics weren't

I Quote from an excellent comment:

Chi Huavara
Kathleen Kennedy cooks the Golden Goose that is the Star Wars franchise, eats it, and then excretes it in the latest entry of the Social Justice Trilogy; The Last Jedi.

There are some cool things here. The crystal foxes. The Yoda puppet was mostly well done, though it seemed they had a little problem with the eyes. The Jedi Island caretakers were pretty cool. But that's really about it.

Poe's primary function in the film is to argue with bossy women who like to keep secrets from him so they can show us how bossy they are, and not to do much of anything else other than whoop in a cockpit here and there. Apparenlty this may have been meant to pass the worthless Bechdel Test, but since Holdo and Leia spend the entire movie talking about Poe I'm not sure that it does.

Rey and Kylo argue with each other via The Force. Rey's all tough and gritty and hard as nails having been a scrapper on Jakku. Remember? But here she somehow can't stand to see a man with his shirt off. Not kidding.
Princess Leia flies through empty airless space like Superman after being blown out of the hull of her ship without incurring a single blemish. Absolutely not kidding here.
Rey asks Luke for Jedi training, but what for? Mary Sue Rey clearly already knows it all. She lectures him about the things he's done and why he really did it and what he's really thinking. Apparently Luke is still the student. Lightsaber training? She bests Luke on the island with a lightsaber. What training is necessary? The Bechdel Galaxy won't allow for any disempowering mansplaining of the Force from a white male like Luke. Chewbacca came along for the ride here but spends most of the time taking a nap off camera with the Star Wars version of a pikachu.

Rey asks Luke for Jedi training, but what for? Mary Sue Rey clearly already knows it all. She lectures him about the things he's done and why he really did it and what he's really thinking. Apparently Luke is still the student. Lightsaber training? She bests Luke on the island with a lightsaber. What training is necessary? The Bechdel Galaxy won't allow for any disempowering mansplaining of the Force from a white male like Luke. Chewbacca came along for the ride here but spends most of the time taking a nap off camera with the Star Wars version of a pikachu.

How they found Luke's lightsaber was a story for another time, remember? Well, not this time. Maybe next time.

Captain Phasma pops up in time for Finn to have a climactic lightsaber-esque battle too. Equal equality equitably equalized everywhere for everyone all of the time. And then Phasma dies just as quickly, not from a winning blow by Finn, but by falling through a collapsing floor into a fireball. I guess it wouldn't be prudent to have a man assaulting a woman in the shadow of Hollywood's Pervnado.

Hux spouts over the top villainous hyperbole. That is all.
BB8 shows up to drive an AT-ST. R2D2 and C3PO make their brief appearances but have little to no function.
We then end with an AT-AT battle a la TESB. Luke makes an appearance to stand off with the AT-ATs but is utterly wasted here. Does he go to town on the AT-AT legs with his lightsaber? Does he lift the AT-ATs into the air telekinetically and bash them into one another? Does he use the Force to enter the minds of the soldiers and force them to stand down? Maybe some other show of the power that he's developed while in exile over the decades? Nope. Instead Luke's merely a mental projection here, and it exhausts him to the point of dying back on his exile planet. He's rusty now, having closed himself off to the Force after all; a necessary contrivance that allowed Rey to best him earlier with a lightsaber I'm guessing. At least we get to see Luke milk an alien nipple; that's what you've been waiting for to see all these years, right?


The rebels - I mean resistance - attack the AT-ATs with a squadron of ground-based cable cars, which drag an armature on the ground so we can see nifty red sand fly into the air. If the writers had done a brief Google search on aircraft physics they would have found the effects of jet spray from low flying craft. The armature was unnecessary and served only to keep the craft bound to the planet's surface. Since the cable cars were restricted to the ground, all TIE fighters would have to do is circle above and fire away.

Finn drives one of these cable cars towards a kind of battering ram weapon that was firing on blast doors which protected the rebel base. He intended to take it out to protect the rebels within. In what could have been a poignant tragic hero moment with Finn dive-bombing into the weapon thus saving the rebels with his sacrifice, Rose shows up out of nowhere in another cable car and deliberately crashes into Finn to "save him" from his dive bombing. So now they're both on the battlefield exposed in their wrecked cable cars, and the battering ram weapon is still operational, bringing down the resistance's protective blast doors. And it was all for Rose's selfish hours old infatuation with Finn. Gee thanks.

Then Kylo and Rey team up to fight Snoke. Hoping some mysteries about Snoke are revealed here? Or maybe a spectacular display of Snoke's power with the Force? Well, Rey deftly kills Snoke by telekinetically switching on a resting lightsaber while he's sitting in his throne pontificating. No answers for you. Kylo and Rey then proceed to fight Snoke's guards, even though they no longer have anything to guard with Snoke's death. Whatever training Daisy Ridley had for this film shows a marked improvement in regards to her stance and motion when fighting from what we saw in TFA, but it still can't erase the silliness of watching a 95 pound girl best adversaries that outweigh her by 150 pounds. And yes, I'd make the same observation about a man if I watched Martin Short battle Rhonda Rhousey.


What's clear to me is that the writers here have no knowledge whatsoever of the deeper layers of the onion that have always provided the foundation for Star Wars. No knowledge of war or military history. No knowledge of mythology or mysticism. No knowledge of the history of civilization. No knowledge of dogfights or sword fighting. No knowledge of basic physics or anatomy. The only things they seem to have knowledge of is previous Star Wars films (or at least the trailers for them), social justice nonsense, and the Bechdel Test. So we're left with a shallow unnuanced exercise in social justice lecturing and feminist posturing couched in cosplay costumes and 40 year old Ralph McQuarrie designs which were rejected from The Original Trilogy production.

I have to think that Rian had to work around whatever Kathleen Kennedy and her story group handed him. But ultimately I truly believe this mostly all about pushing a political agenda at this point. It explains so much. It explains why professional critics will now give good reviews to any film like, like TFA and TLJ which are saturated with social justice nonsense and lecturing without regard to film craft. It explains why Jurassic World received poor critical reviews; it had a decided lack of this political messaging. This in turn might explain why Jurassic World's Colin Trevorrow was let go from Episode IX, if he refused to bother with this silly political messaging, as he did in Jurassic World. After seeing all of the hammy jokes in TLJ, does anyone still believe that Lord and Miller were let go for making the Han Solo movie too jokey and comedic? No, there is something else going on here. And now in contrast to Trevorrow's firing despite an enjoyable and successful social justice free Jurassic World which is now receiving an earned sequel, Rian Johnson gets awarded his very own trilogy after producing this turd burger before its box office track record can be established. There's an interesting story to be told here, but it's not in the Star Wars universe. It's in a documentary that interviews all of the dejected Disney-era Star Wars directors after their NDAs expire.

"Let the past die kill it if you have" to is an admission that they are evil considering it is said by Kylo Ren

It is the Writers speaking to the audience as much as to Rey.

And thats exactly what this movie is doing killing the once Majestic Star wars

Its now down to 50% User score on Rotten tomatoes will it achieve the ultimate dishonor and go below 50%? Time will tell. ;)

You can dismiss that if you like but considering it 166 000+ people thats no longer something you can in all sensibleness dismiss.
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."

-Thomas Paine-

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11843
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Post by Ketraar » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 18:58

Sorry, I'm not going to try and convince you to like a movie you dont like. But I stand by the statement that fans have (and should not have) any say in how any creative work is done BY OTHERS. You can criticise it and dislike it AFTER its done and then based on what the creation is and not what you would have done. :roll:

If you like to explain why you think the plot is a joke, I dont mind read it, but dont feed me stuff others write in an attempt to convince me. I watched and read many different people's take on the movie and many I understand (while not agreeing), but some are just ludicrous fanboyisms.
Skism wrote:Its now down to 50% User score on Rotten tomatoes will it achieve the ultimate dishonor and go below 50%? Time will tell. ;)
Who cares, it could be 0 for all I care, it wont make it bad movie for me. That is not how opinions work. :-P

MFG

Ketraar

Skism
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon, 22. Mar 10, 21:36
x3tc

Post by Skism » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 20:52

Ketraar wrote:Sorry, I'm not going to try and convince you to like a movie you dont like. But I stand by the statement that fans have (and should not have) any say in how any creative work is done BY OTHERS. You can criticise it and dislike it AFTER its done and then based on what the creation is and not what you would have done. :roll:

If you like to explain why you think the plot is a joke, I dont mind read it, but dont feed me stuff others write in an attempt to convince me. I watched and read many different people's take on the movie and many I understand (while not agreeing), but some are just ludicrous fanboyisms.
Skism wrote:Its now down to 50% User score on Rotten tomatoes will it achieve the ultimate dishonor and go below 50%? Time will tell. ;)
Who cares, it could be 0 for all I care, it wont make it bad movie for me. That is not how opinions work. :-P

MFG

Ketraar
See this is called dismissing your market - and its a really bad idea that results in poor financials.

http://www.showbiz411.com/2017/12/19/st ... ce-awakens

It has also experienced 68.9% drop in its weekend to weekend box office, and a 77% drop in its Friday to Friday box office. This is below every single Star Wars film Audiences have spoken and they are not impressed.

Now why is that significant?

Well several reasons actually

https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jo ... -jedi.html

Before exhibitors can begin screening "Star Wars: The Last Jedi" this December, they must first commit to a set of top-secret terms that numerous theater owners say are the most onerous they've ever seen. Disney will receive about 65% of ticket-sales revenue from the film, a new benchmark for a Hollywood studio. Disney is also requiring theaters to show the movie in their largest auditorium for at least four weeks.

Ignoring the terms carries an unusual penalty. If a theater violates any condition of the distribution agreement, Disney can charge it an additional 5%, bringing the studio's total haul to 70% of sales on a movie likely to gross more than $500 million at the domestic box office.
Toward the end of a monthlong run, Mr. Akin said he would be unable to swap in more popular titles and instead have to play "Last Jedi" to near-empty auditoriums -- while still giving Disney 65% of those paltry sales. The studio is applying the 65% split across all weeks of the film's release, rather than some studios' practice of beginning a split at a high figure and then lowering it in subsequent weeks.
And this just in:

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/12/holida ... 201912175/

Thats Jumanji outperforming the Last Jedi

Star Wars for gods sake is being nearly beaten by something that is a total unknown.

Thats why you should care

Oh and also its just frankly a bad movie
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."

-Thomas Paine-

User avatar
Rice
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu, 29. Apr 10, 14:21
x3tc

Post by Rice » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 21:31

Jumanji, wasnt that the Boardgame which makes the gameplot comes true or even Snatch peoples until the game has been continued? ;P
[ external image ][ external image ][ external image ]
Eine der hoffnungsreichsten Lebenslagen ist die, wenn es uns so schlecht geht, dass es uns nicht mehr schlechter gehen kann. [Felix Krull]

Skism
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon, 22. Mar 10, 21:36
x3tc

Post by Skism » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 23:26

Rice wrote:Jumanji, wasnt that the Boardgame which makes the gameplot comes true or even Snatch peoples until the game has been continued? ;P
Yeah.

And thats nearly outperforming the Latest Star Wars

STAR WARS for Gods sake

only one of the most iconic series of the last 40 years.

Just goes to show the damage that the SJW (Social Justice Warrior for the uninitiated) can do

This is what happens when you submit to their narrative: among many things your market value tanks.
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."

-Thomas Paine-

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11843
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Post by Ketraar » Wed, 3. Jan 18, 23:29

Skism, you can throw all this stats at me all day, I... dont... care. I saw Blade Runner 2049 and it was one of the greatest movies in recent years, its fantastic. Its much better than any Star Wars movie by a large margin, but it made no/little money in the box office, so by your logic it must be a bad movie. :roll:

Seriously, Pirates made a gazillion cash, Triple X did, Transformers did, Furious crap did, does that make them good movies, heck no they all are garbage fast food crap. So yeah I could not care less what the "market" says. SW was a good movie and one of the better Star Wars movies.

MFG

Ketraar

Skism
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon, 22. Mar 10, 21:36
x3tc

Post by Skism » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 00:19

Ketraar wrote:Skism, you can throw all this stats at me all day, I... dont... care. I saw Blade Runner 2049 and it was one of the greatest movies in recent years, its fantastic. Its much better than any Star Wars movie by a large margin, but it made no/little money in the box office, so by your logic it must be a bad movie. :roll:

Seriously, Pirates made a gazillion cash, Triple X did, Transformers did, Furious crap did, does that make them good movies, heck no they all are garbage fast food crap. So yeah I could not care less what the "market" says. SW was a good movie and one of the better Star Wars movies.

MFG

Ketraar
Oh I get that you don't care, I get that you won't accept stats.

I get it and I am not surprised in the slightest.

You have offered no evidence though for it being a good movie, but continue to repeat that it is.

But I'm not surprised you are doubling down

But hey if Star Wars going down the tubes doesn’t bother you well what can I say?




:? :? :?
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."

-Thomas Paine-

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11843
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Post by Ketraar » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 01:07

Well not that I need to provide "evidence" to justify my subjective opinion about entertainment. I did though state what I liked and what I didnt, this usually is enough to indicate the origin, or evidence if you like, which I base my opinion on.

I can repeat it if you like, stuff like the action set-pieces, most of the twists and character arcs and choices made by the director. The score and sound design was great, the cinematography was good too. So these are "evidence" that make TLJ a good movie, its not a great movie because some choices, like the Canto Bight fetch quest, didnt land with me and they felt out of place.

But I didnt go into the movie expecting specifc things, I never go to movies with that mind set, as chances are my imagination will not match the directors vision, in fact if a movie fails to surprise me on any level it makes it less appealing to me, I want escapism, I dont require my opinion validated or my made-up story confirmed.
But hey if Star Wars going down the tubes doesn’t bother you well what can I say?
Why should it bother me? Its a movie, its not the cure to cancer or the meaning of life. If they make the movies crap I dont go and watch them, pretty simple, there are plenty movies, some are actually good, if its a good Star Wars movie even better. :-)

MFG

Ketraar

User avatar
ezra-r
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri, 14. Oct 05, 21:04
x4

Post by ezra-r » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 01:19

Ketraar wrote:...

Its a thing these days, where "fans" feel they are entitled to have a say in the creative process of others, I find it both interesting and equally infuriating...
Not sure if you are venting your frustrations to me here or answering to me for something I said, surely not my case in anything I said.

Golden_Gonads
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri, 13. Feb 04, 20:21
x3tc

Post by Golden_Gonads » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 09:28

Skism wrote:And thats nearly outperforming the Latest Star Wars STAR WARS for Gods sake only one of the most iconic series of the last 40 years.
I've no idea where you got that information, but its... Wrong. Jumanji has taken around $350 million worldwide thus far, whilst Star Wars has taken around $1.1 Billion. Indeed, The Last Jedi is already the 19th highest grossing film of all time.

User avatar
philip_hughes
Posts: 7757
Joined: Tue, 29. Aug 06, 16:06
x3tc

Post by philip_hughes » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 10:34

I liked it when they smoked snoke. Very unexpected. I hate movies with predictable arcs. Tlj had many twists which should be applauded.
Split now give me death? Nah. Just give me your ship.

Rive
Posts: 2260
Joined: Fri, 24. Apr 09, 16:36
x3tc

Post by Rive » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 11:13

philip_hughes wrote:I liked it when they smoked snoke. Very unexpected. I hate movies with predictable arcs. Tlj had many twists which should be applauded.
Almost exactly my thoughts.

As a movie alone, without context, it's just acceptable.
As a rebellious part of the whole old Star Wars series/universe, it can be considered 'great' (or a 'failure', depending on one's point of view).

Nostalgic feelings aside, the original series (ep. IV, V, VI) are also not up to the actual standards. They are from the same age as the BSG TOS, and if somebody has the necessary masochist mindset to watch them together then plenty of similarities can be found. Yet, the BSG needed a complete redo to resurrect the brand, while SW lived on based on the legend alone. But that also means that it could not really evolve and stuck in the past.

The 'great' part of this movie is that many old plot 'solutions' were broken down to fit some new 'realities' on by one. If this is an opening of a new era and they will have the guts to continue, then I'll just accept it and go on with the flow. It'll be interesting.

If they can't follow up, then I'll just forget this movie and go on with my nostalgic feelings towards the extended universe.

Bishop149
Posts: 7232
Joined: Fri, 9. Apr 04, 21:19
x3

Post by Bishop149 » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 11:47

Ketraar wrote: Seriously, Pirates made a gazillion cash, Triple X did, Transformers did, Furious crap did, does that make them good movies, heck no they all are garbage fast food crap. So yeah I could not care less what the "market" says. SW was a good movie and one of the better Star Wars movies.
This is a good point, arguing that popularity is reflective of quality is silly, as is made obvious by complete garbage piles making billions and masterful pieces of cinematic art bombing.
In fact it applies far more generally than just movies. . . . . I mean look at the popular crap that passes for "coffee" these days. . . . . or beer. :roll:
"Shoot for the Moon. If you miss, you'll end up co-orbiting the Sun alongside Earth, living out your days alone in the void within sight of the lush, welcoming home you left behind." - XKCD

User avatar
Antilogic
Posts: 7526
Joined: Wed, 6. Apr 05, 20:33
x3tc

Post by Antilogic » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 12:07

Skism wrote: Just goes to show the damage that the SJW (Social Justice Warrior for the uninitiated) can do
Ah. Of course. It has a GIRL as the lead so.. I get it... I get it...

Bishop149
Posts: 7232
Joined: Fri, 9. Apr 04, 21:19
x3

Post by Bishop149 » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 12:44

Antilogic wrote:
Skism wrote: Just goes to show the damage that the SJW (Social Justice Warrior for the uninitiated) can do
Ah. Of course. It has a GIRL as the lead so.. I get it... I get it...
Most of the arguments I've seen about TLJ have adhered to the following pattern.

A) Points out TLJs flaws
B) Points out that every one of said flaws applies to the original trilogy, to a greater or lesser extent.
- [optional argument about creative licence and "realism" in science fiction*]
A) But Rey!
B) But Luke!
A) But Snoke!
B) Who cares!
A) But Porgs!!
B) But Ewoks!!
A) Throws (usually transparently sexist or racist, sometimes both) hissy fit and rants about SWJs. . . . . Trump may also be mentioned.

*This is a joke, I mean FFS its STAR WARS! The softest of soft sci-fi.
"Shoot for the Moon. If you miss, you'll end up co-orbiting the Sun alongside Earth, living out your days alone in the void within sight of the lush, welcoming home you left behind." - XKCD

Skism
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon, 22. Mar 10, 21:36
x3tc

Post by Skism » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 13:32

Antilogic wrote:
Skism wrote: Just goes to show the damage that the SJW (Social Justice Warrior for the uninitiated) can do
Ah. Of course. It has a GIRL as the lead so.. I get it... I get it...
Oh I see so we have arrived at accusations of sexism.

dear Lord can't you at least be original? :roll:

Perspective ;)
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest."

-Thomas Paine-

Bishop149
Posts: 7232
Joined: Fri, 9. Apr 04, 21:19
x3

Post by Bishop149 » Thu, 4. Jan 18, 13:35

Skism wrote: Perspective ;)
What people who post stuff like this fail to see: It's possible to hold both viewpoints without them conflicting.
If they do conflict for you, then take a long hard look at why.
"Shoot for the Moon. If you miss, you'll end up co-orbiting the Sun alongside Earth, living out your days alone in the void within sight of the lush, welcoming home you left behind." - XKCD

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic English”