Perhaps I had misinterpreted your question, or perhaps what you were asking weren't clear enough, or simply were open enough that it can be interpreted differently then what you originally intended. I'm simply point out that even if all Democrat vote Democrat and all Republican vote Republican -which actually doesn't happen btw, part of the reason Hilary lost because she lost area that had voted Democrat for decades- ultimately it's still gonna be the independent voters that decided, the affiliated voters don't have the number to carry their own party for either side.
Which - I should remind you - it is the context of the current discussion about "what is the better candidate". Which pretty much all the posts on the pages are talking about. To affiliated maybe that's an irrelevant question, but to independent voters that's an important and valid statement. Your post came in the middle of that, so I don't think it's too unreasonable for me to assume it is within the same frame of the current topic, or is it? And if it's not what you meant, that's fine, simply seek clarification, or correction if you believe you were misunderstood.
But I guess for a thread that's constantly talk about Trump, it's natural for his 'style' to have an influence here.You've managed to not only fail to answer the question, but answered a non existent question in the belief that you're answering a question.
An example of an unrare talent indeed!
In Trump's universe where bad is good, smart is dumb, i'm happy to say, i'm dumb indeed.
